From: MNMikeW on

"William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message
news:clark-C5A835.13463916042010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> In article <82rdn4F1cvU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
>> "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:f55c1a26-d297-4bc0-b5a1-9cc93540fec1(a)q23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
>> On Apr 15, 10:50 pm, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>> > "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>> >
>> > news:054333ff-586d-48c6-91b8-537ac67eae85(a)5g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
>> > On Apr 15, 7:30 pm, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>> >
>> > >news:69e8eff9-d49a-4e27-9c4c-d52ab369821a(a)u22g2000yqf.googlegroups.com...
>> > > On Apr 15, 5:37 pm, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > > "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>> >
>> > > >news:9df142a5-6f3b-47d2-b5dc-0c67f744e494(a)b23g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
>> > > > On Apr 15, 2:32 pm, Dinosaur_Sr <frostb...(a)dukesofbiohazard.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> >
>> > > > > On Apr 15, 2:03 pm, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > > > > On Apr 15, 1:39 pm, "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > > > > > On Apr 15, 10:54 am, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > > > > > > "Carbon" <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
>> >
>> > > > > > > >news:4bc50040$0$5034$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>> >
>> > > > > > > > > On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:39:31 -0500, MNMikeW wrote:
>> > > > > > > > >> "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>> > > > > > > > >> news:b1d3e9da-12ac-4ff1-
>> > > > > > > > >> b4e9-9cd696a4d...(a)k33g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
>> > > > > > > > >>> On Apr 13, 2:34 pm, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com>
>> > > > > > > > >>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > > > > > > >>>> Straight from crashtheteaparty.org:
>> >
>> > > > > > > > >>>> "Whenever possible, we will act on behalf of the Tea
>> > > > > > > > >>>> Party
>> > > > > > > > >>>> in
>> > > > > > > > >>>> ways
>> > > > > > > > >>>> which exaggerate their least appealing qualities
>> > > > > > > > >>>> (misspelled
>> > > > > > > > >>>> protest
>> > > > > > > > >>>> signs, wild claims in TV interviews, etc.) to further
>> > > > > > > > >>>> distance
>> > > > > > > > >>>> them
>> > > > > > > > >>>> from mainstream America and damage the public's
>> > > > > > > > >>>> opinion
>> > > > > > > > >>>> of
>> > > > > > > > >>>> them. We
>> > > > > > > > >>>> will also use the inside information that we have
>> > > > > > > > >>>> gained
>> > > > > > > > >>>> in
>> > > > > > > > >>>> order to
>> > > > > > > > >>>> disrupt and derail their plans."
>> >
>> > > > > > > > >>>> I don't know, to me it looks like that's exactly what
>> > > > > > > > >>>> the
>> > > > > > > > >>>> sign
>> > > > > > > > >>>> man
>> > > > > > > > >>>> did.
>> >
>> > > > > > > > >>> I doubt that crashtheteaparty is anything more than a
>> > > > > > > > >>> website.
>> > > > > > > > >>> But
>> > > > > > > > >>>you'll keep trying to depict it as some kind of lynch
>> > > > > > > > >>>mob,
>> > > > > > > > >>>I'm
>> > > > > > > > >>>sure.
>> >
>> > > > > > > > >> That is exactly what it is. And exactly what I would
>> > > > > > > > >> expect
>> > > > > > > > >> the
>> > > > > > > > >> left
>> > > > > > > > >> to stoop to.
>> >
>> > > > > > > > > Mike, read the article. It's the work of one loon.
>> >
>> > > > > > > > It was started by one loon. And he's up to 1000+ friends on
>> > > > > > > > Facebook
>> > > > > > > > and
>> > > > > > > > over 400 "followers" on Twitter. So the loons are coming
>> > > > > > > > out
>> > > > > > > > of
>> > > > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > woodwork.- Hide quoted text -
>> >
>> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>> >
>> > > > > > > 1,400 "loons" who don't like the tea party movement. So what?
>> > > > > > > They
>> > > > > > > haven't done anything. If the guy in Oregon does lead people
>> > > > > > > in
>> > > > > > > disrupting tea party rallies (such as the one going on right
>> > > > > > > now
>> > > > > > > in
>> > > > > > > DC) and trying to deprive people of their right to free
>> > > > > > > speech,
>> > > > > > > I
>> > > > > > > will
>> > > > > > > joinyouin denouncing them. Until then, they are best
>> > > > > > > ignored.-
>> > > > > > > Hide
>> > > > > > > quoted text -
>> >
>> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>> >
>> > > > > > Haven't done anything? What has you so convinced (besides your
>> > > > > > political ideology) that they haven't been carrying signs with
>> > > > > > moronic
>> > > > > > misspelled messages around and using "racist" epithets?
>> >
>> > > > > Of course one could do the same thing at say global warming
>> > > > > rallies,
>> > > > > pose as supporters of say cap and trade, misspell signs, make
>> > > > > offensive remarks...and they wouldn't really be doing
>> > > > > anything...best
>> > > > > to just let it go!- Hide quoted text -
>> >
>> > > > > - Show quoted text -
>> >
>> > > > Right. All the people who have been carrying racist and otherwise
>> > > > offensive signs at tea party rallies are actually liberal plants.
>> > > > You
>> > > > people amaze me.
>> >
>> > > > =======================
>> > > > It's EXACTLY something the left would do.- Hide quoted text -
>> >
>> > > > - Show quoted text -
>> >
>> > > As a member of what you call "the left" I can say I've never heard of
>> > > anybody doing that or talking about doing it.
>> >
>> > > =======================================
>> > > Of course that means it never happens right.
>> >
>> > Well, you're certainly welcome to provide some evidence that it does.
>> >
>> > ===============================
>> >
>> > True. We'll see what tomorrow brings.- Hide quoted text -
>> >
>> > - Show quoted text -
>>
>> Here's the Fox News story about yesterday's TP rally in DC.
>> Apparently, no left-wing infiltrators were present.
>>
>> http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/04/15/tea-party-protesters-descend-dc-new
>> -contract-america/
>>
>>
>> ================
>>
>> There was at least one.
>>
>> http://michellemalkin.com/2010/04/15/crashers-they-came-they-saw-they-failed/
>
> Michelle Malking - wow, there is a truly reliable and unbiased source.

Just as reliable and unbiased as Wonkette.


From: MNMikeW on

"William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message
news:clark-D7A928.13473116042010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> In article <MPG.26324baecc5f180b989de8(a)news.giganews.com>,
> BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <clark-B0CE5E.11033716042010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-
>> state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says...
>> >
>> > In article <MPG.26323c55bf80b00f989de7(a)news.giganews.com>,
>> > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > In article <hq9qmi$90j$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, no_spam_(a)no_mail.com
>> > > says...
>> > > >
>> > > > "BAR" <screw(a)you.com> wrote in message
>> > > > news:MPG.263159f0a1bbff11989de2(a)news.giganews.com...
>> > > > > In article <clark-5E0FAD.16474115042010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-
>> > > > > state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says...
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > Not only that, the results of a poll were just released that
>> > > > >> > indicate
>> > > > >> > that the supporters of the TEA party movement are more highly
>> > > > >> > educated
>> > > > >> > and earn more than the public at large. By the far-right
>> > > > >> > leaning
>> > > > >> > NY
>> > > > >> > Times no less :-)
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/15/us/politics/15poll.html
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> But the public at large is not the block of Democratic, liberal
>> > > > >> voters,
>> > > > >> because a sizable chunk of the "public at large" does not
>> > > > >> participate at
>> > > > >> all in the political process. Clearly the Tea Parters are
>> > > > >> Republican,
>> > > > >> and older, since in spite of their animosity to Washington
>> > > > >> (read -
>> > > > >> having a black man as President), they want Social Security left
>> > > > >> alone.
>> > > > >> Tells you which demographic group they are form.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Which party are you registered with to cast votes in Ohio?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > * Communist Party of Ohio
>> > > > > * Constitution Party of Ohio
>> > > > > * Green Party of Ohio
>> > > > > * Libertarian Party of Ohio
>> > > > > * Natural Law Party of Ohio
>> > > > > * Ohio Democratic Party
>> > > > > * Ohio Republican Party
>> > > > > * Reform Party of Ohio
>> > > > > * Socialist Workers Party of Ohio
>> > > >
>> > > > Clark isn't a US citizen.
>> > >
>> > > I am waiting for him to show up on "Cops" some night and then next we
>> > > will hear about him being deported back to the motherland.
>> >
>> > Don't hold your breath.
>>
>> You are the high strung type who is easily set off and argumentative.
>
> Really? Prove it (as opposed to someone who enjoys winding up wingnut
> idiocy).

You prove it on every post.


From: The Bogeyman on
On Apr 16, 1:45 pm, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-
state.edu> wrote:
>
> >http://michellemalkin.com/2010/04/15/crashers-they-came-they-saw-they...
>
> > This time they were busted only because the tea partiers were tipped
> > off beforehand. Who knows how long it had been going on before they
> > were exposed by the cable news outlets.
>
> > I could swear someone already posted this link. Areyouin denial?
>
> "Michelle Malkin"? Give me peace.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

That's gotta be it. Teh evil Michelle Malkin personally photoshopped
those images to make libruls look mean. My bad.
From: bknight on
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:27:12 -0700 (PDT), Dinosaur_Sr
<frostback(a)dukesofbiohazard.com> wrote:

>> Either prove this assertion or stop making it.
>

>In any event, you prove the N word and spitting allegations and I'll
>prove the dem organizers involvement in the dirty politics against the
>tea party people. As usual, blog posts and hearsay don't count.

You've lost your mind Rob. Maybe the allegations about the N word are
absolutely false. Does that give someone from an opposing view the
right to lie too?

I never get over the fact that you somehow got a PhD. You just aren't
very smart.

BK
From: John B. on
On Apr 16, 1:27 pm, Dinosaur_Sr <frostb...(a)dukesofbiohazard.com>
wrote:
> On Apr 16, 1:07 pm, "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 16, 12:58 pm, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 16, 11:23 am, "R&B" <none_of_your_busin...(a)all.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On 2010-04-13 09:26:01 -0400, The Bogeyman said:
>
> > > > > On Apr 13, 8:17 am, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-
> > > > > state.edu> wrote:
> > > > >> In article <201004121801001867-noneofyourbusiness(a)allcom>,
>
> > > > >>  "R&B" <none_of_your_busin...(a)all.com> wrote:
>
> > > > >>> Youwon't see them on FOX NEWS.  They don't show them there.  Doesn't
> > > > >>> fit their narrative.
>
> > > > >>> Randy
>
> > > > >> Here's one for starters. No surprise that the guy is functionally
> > > > >> illiterate, too.
>
> > > > >>http://www.groundreport.com/includes/ajax/image_popup.php?image=29216...
> > > > >> mage_id=1- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > How is that "racist" when he is obviously applying the word to
> > > > > himself? It is just a crude way of comparing what the federal
> > > > > government does to taxpayers to what the antebellum plantation owners
> > > > > did to the slaves, i.e. profiting from their labor under the threat of
> > > > > violence.
>
> > > > > A word in an of itself is not "racist",youhave to consider the
> > > > > context in which it is being used and the intent of the person using
> > > > > it. And I thought the self-labelled "progressives" understood the
> > > > > concept of nuance.
>
> > > > So I guess it's just a coincidence that all this "ni**ger" talk didn't
> > > > boil over into the public square until America voted a black man into
> > > > the White House.  Is that whatyouwould have us believe?
>
> > > What "ni**er" talk? The only time I ever hear it is when some lefty is
> > > accusing anyone who disagrees with the policies of the administration
> > > a "racist". If you recall, all of the stink raised by the
> > > congressional black caucus members who walked through the crowd of
> > > protestors turned out to be lies (n-word) and exaggerations
> > > (spitting).
>
> > And with what has come to light about the tactics the libs
>
> > > are using to infiltrate the tea parties and display offensive and
> > > misspelled placards no one can say what the motives were.
>
> > Either prove this assertion or stop making it.
>
> Same proof as for the N comments and the spitting when dem
> congresspeople baited the tea party protesters at the health care
> vote.The fact that the dem baiting didn't provoke anything is
> interesting enough, but the fact that lefties go to tea party rallies
> and try to discredit the legit protesters there show the respect they
> have for legit protest...only legit when done by the left!
>
> In any event, you prove the N word and spitting allegations and I'll
> prove the dem organizers involvement in the dirty politics against the
> tea party people. As usual, blog posts and hearsay don't count.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Then I'll assume your Michelle Malkin blog post supposedly proving
left-wing infiltration of tea party rallies is not legitimate.