From: MNMikeW on 16 Apr 2010 13:55 "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message news:clark-C5A835.13463916042010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article <82rdn4F1cvU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:f55c1a26-d297-4bc0-b5a1-9cc93540fec1(a)q23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com... >> On Apr 15, 10:50 pm, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: >> > "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> > >> > news:054333ff-586d-48c6-91b8-537ac67eae85(a)5g2000yqj.googlegroups.com... >> > On Apr 15, 7:30 pm, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> > >> > >news:69e8eff9-d49a-4e27-9c4c-d52ab369821a(a)u22g2000yqf.googlegroups.com... >> > > On Apr 15, 5:37 pm, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: >> > >> > > > "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> > >> > > >news:9df142a5-6f3b-47d2-b5dc-0c67f744e494(a)b23g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... >> > > > On Apr 15, 2:32 pm, Dinosaur_Sr <frostb...(a)dukesofbiohazard.com> >> > > > wrote: >> > >> > > > > On Apr 15, 2:03 pm, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > > > > On Apr 15, 1:39 pm, "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > > > > > On Apr 15, 10:54 am, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: >> > >> > > > > > > > "Carbon" <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >> > >> > > > > > > >news:4bc50040$0$5034$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >> > >> > > > > > > > > On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:39:31 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: >> > > > > > > > >> "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> > > > > > > > >> news:b1d3e9da-12ac-4ff1- >> > > > > > > > >> b4e9-9cd696a4d...(a)k33g2000yqc.googlegroups.com... >> > > > > > > > >>> On Apr 13, 2:34 pm, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> >> > > > > > > > >>> wrote: >> > >> > > > > > > > >>>> Straight from crashtheteaparty.org: >> > >> > > > > > > > >>>> "Whenever possible, we will act on behalf of the Tea >> > > > > > > > >>>> Party >> > > > > > > > >>>> in >> > > > > > > > >>>> ways >> > > > > > > > >>>> which exaggerate their least appealing qualities >> > > > > > > > >>>> (misspelled >> > > > > > > > >>>> protest >> > > > > > > > >>>> signs, wild claims in TV interviews, etc.) to further >> > > > > > > > >>>> distance >> > > > > > > > >>>> them >> > > > > > > > >>>> from mainstream America and damage the public's >> > > > > > > > >>>> opinion >> > > > > > > > >>>> of >> > > > > > > > >>>> them. We >> > > > > > > > >>>> will also use the inside information that we have >> > > > > > > > >>>> gained >> > > > > > > > >>>> in >> > > > > > > > >>>> order to >> > > > > > > > >>>> disrupt and derail their plans." >> > >> > > > > > > > >>>> I don't know, to me it looks like that's exactly what >> > > > > > > > >>>> the >> > > > > > > > >>>> sign >> > > > > > > > >>>> man >> > > > > > > > >>>> did. >> > >> > > > > > > > >>> I doubt that crashtheteaparty is anything more than a >> > > > > > > > >>> website. >> > > > > > > > >>> But >> > > > > > > > >>>you'll keep trying to depict it as some kind of lynch >> > > > > > > > >>>mob, >> > > > > > > > >>>I'm >> > > > > > > > >>>sure. >> > >> > > > > > > > >> That is exactly what it is. And exactly what I would >> > > > > > > > >> expect >> > > > > > > > >> the >> > > > > > > > >> left >> > > > > > > > >> to stoop to. >> > >> > > > > > > > > Mike, read the article. It's the work of one loon. >> > >> > > > > > > > It was started by one loon. And he's up to 1000+ friends on >> > > > > > > > and >> > > > > > > > over 400 "followers" on Twitter. So the loons are coming >> > > > > > > > out >> > > > > > > > of >> > > > > > > > the >> > > > > > > > woodwork.- Hide quoted text - >> > >> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - >> > >> > > > > > > 1,400 "loons" who don't like the tea party movement. So what? >> > > > > > > They >> > > > > > > haven't done anything. If the guy in Oregon does lead people >> > > > > > > in >> > > > > > > disrupting tea party rallies (such as the one going on right >> > > > > > > now >> > > > > > > in >> > > > > > > DC) and trying to deprive people of their right to free >> > > > > > > speech, >> > > > > > > I >> > > > > > > will >> > > > > > > joinyouin denouncing them. Until then, they are best >> > > > > > > ignored.- >> > > > > > > Hide >> > > > > > > quoted text - >> > >> > > > > > > - Show quoted text - >> > >> > > > > > Haven't done anything? What has you so convinced (besides your >> > > > > > political ideology) that they haven't been carrying signs with >> > > > > > moronic >> > > > > > misspelled messages around and using "racist" epithets? >> > >> > > > > Of course one could do the same thing at say global warming >> > > > > rallies, >> > > > > pose as supporters of say cap and trade, misspell signs, make >> > > > > offensive remarks...and they wouldn't really be doing >> > > > > anything...best >> > > > > to just let it go!- Hide quoted text - >> > >> > > > > - Show quoted text - >> > >> > > > Right. All the people who have been carrying racist and otherwise >> > > > offensive signs at tea party rallies are actually liberal plants. >> > > > You >> > > > people amaze me. >> > >> > > > ======================= >> > > > It's EXACTLY something the left would do.- Hide quoted text - >> > >> > > > - Show quoted text - >> > >> > > As a member of what you call "the left" I can say I've never heard of >> > > anybody doing that or talking about doing it. >> > >> > > ======================================= >> > > Of course that means it never happens right. >> > >> > Well, you're certainly welcome to provide some evidence that it does. >> > >> > =============================== >> > >> > True. We'll see what tomorrow brings.- Hide quoted text - >> > >> > - Show quoted text - >> >> Here's the Fox News story about yesterday's TP rally in DC. >> Apparently, no left-wing infiltrators were present. >> >> http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/04/15/tea-party-protesters-descend-dc-new >> -contract-america/ >> >> >> ================ >> >> There was at least one. >> >> http://michellemalkin.com/2010/04/15/crashers-they-came-they-saw-they-failed/ > > Michelle Malking - wow, there is a truly reliable and unbiased source. Just as reliable and unbiased as Wonkette.
From: MNMikeW on 16 Apr 2010 13:56 "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message news:clark-D7A928.13473116042010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article <MPG.26324baecc5f180b989de8(a)news.giganews.com>, > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > >> In article <clark-B0CE5E.11033716042010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- >> state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... >> > >> > In article <MPG.26323c55bf80b00f989de7(a)news.giganews.com>, >> > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >> > >> > > In article <hq9qmi$90j$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, no_spam_(a)no_mail.com >> > > says... >> > > > >> > > > "BAR" <screw(a)you.com> wrote in message >> > > > news:MPG.263159f0a1bbff11989de2(a)news.giganews.com... >> > > > > In article <clark-5E0FAD.16474115042010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- >> > > > > state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > Not only that, the results of a poll were just released that >> > > > >> > indicate >> > > > >> > that the supporters of the TEA party movement are more highly >> > > > >> > educated >> > > > >> > and earn more than the public at large. By the far-right >> > > > >> > leaning >> > > > >> > NY >> > > > >> > Times no less :-) >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/15/us/politics/15poll.html >> > > > >> >> > > > >> But the public at large is not the block of Democratic, liberal >> > > > >> voters, >> > > > >> because a sizable chunk of the "public at large" does not >> > > > >> participate at >> > > > >> all in the political process. Clearly the Tea Parters are >> > > > >> Republican, >> > > > >> and older, since in spite of their animosity to Washington >> > > > >> (read - >> > > > >> having a black man as President), they want Social Security left >> > > > >> alone. >> > > > >> Tells you which demographic group they are form. >> > > > > >> > > > > Which party are you registered with to cast votes in Ohio? >> > > > > >> > > > > * Communist Party of Ohio >> > > > > * Constitution Party of Ohio >> > > > > * Green Party of Ohio >> > > > > * Libertarian Party of Ohio >> > > > > * Natural Law Party of Ohio >> > > > > * Ohio Democratic Party >> > > > > * Ohio Republican Party >> > > > > * Reform Party of Ohio >> > > > > * Socialist Workers Party of Ohio >> > > > >> > > > Clark isn't a US citizen. >> > > >> > > I am waiting for him to show up on "Cops" some night and then next we >> > > will hear about him being deported back to the motherland. >> > >> > Don't hold your breath. >> >> You are the high strung type who is easily set off and argumentative. > > Really? Prove it (as opposed to someone who enjoys winding up wingnut > idiocy). You prove it on every post.
From: The Bogeyman on 16 Apr 2010 14:06 On Apr 16, 1:45 pm, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- state.edu> wrote: > > >http://michellemalkin.com/2010/04/15/crashers-they-came-they-saw-they... > > > This time they were busted only because the tea partiers were tipped > > off beforehand. Who knows how long it had been going on before they > > were exposed by the cable news outlets. > > > I could swear someone already posted this link. Areyouin denial? > > "Michelle Malkin"? Give me peace.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - That's gotta be it. Teh evil Michelle Malkin personally photoshopped those images to make libruls look mean. My bad.
From: bknight on 16 Apr 2010 15:03 On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:27:12 -0700 (PDT), Dinosaur_Sr <frostback(a)dukesofbiohazard.com> wrote: >> Either prove this assertion or stop making it. > >In any event, you prove the N word and spitting allegations and I'll >prove the dem organizers involvement in the dirty politics against the >tea party people. As usual, blog posts and hearsay don't count. You've lost your mind Rob. Maybe the allegations about the N word are absolutely false. Does that give someone from an opposing view the right to lie too? I never get over the fact that you somehow got a PhD. You just aren't very smart. BK
From: John B. on 16 Apr 2010 15:57
On Apr 16, 1:27 pm, Dinosaur_Sr <frostb...(a)dukesofbiohazard.com> wrote: > On Apr 16, 1:07 pm, "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 16, 12:58 pm, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Apr 16, 11:23 am, "R&B" <none_of_your_busin...(a)all.com> wrote: > > > > > On 2010-04-13 09:26:01 -0400, The Bogeyman said: > > > > > > On Apr 13, 8:17 am, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- > > > > > state.edu> wrote: > > > > >> In article <201004121801001867-noneofyourbusiness(a)allcom>, > > > > > >> "R&B" <none_of_your_busin...(a)all.com> wrote: > > > > > >>> Youwon't see them on FOX NEWS. They don't show them there. Doesn't > > > > >>> fit their narrative. > > > > > >>> Randy > > > > > >> Here's one for starters. No surprise that the guy is functionally > > > > >> illiterate, too. > > > > > >>http://www.groundreport.com/includes/ajax/image_popup.php?image=29216... > > > > >> mage_id=1- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > How is that "racist" when he is obviously applying the word to > > > > > himself? It is just a crude way of comparing what the federal > > > > > government does to taxpayers to what the antebellum plantation owners > > > > > did to the slaves, i.e. profiting from their labor under the threat of > > > > > violence. > > > > > > A word in an of itself is not "racist",youhave to consider the > > > > > context in which it is being used and the intent of the person using > > > > > it. And I thought the self-labelled "progressives" understood the > > > > > concept of nuance. > > > > > So I guess it's just a coincidence that all this "ni**ger" talk didn't > > > > boil over into the public square until America voted a black man into > > > > the White House. Is that whatyouwould have us believe? > > > > What "ni**er" talk? The only time I ever hear it is when some lefty is > > > accusing anyone who disagrees with the policies of the administration > > > a "racist". If you recall, all of the stink raised by the > > > congressional black caucus members who walked through the crowd of > > > protestors turned out to be lies (n-word) and exaggerations > > > (spitting). > > > And with what has come to light about the tactics the libs > > > > are using to infiltrate the tea parties and display offensive and > > > misspelled placards no one can say what the motives were. > > > Either prove this assertion or stop making it. > > Same proof as for the N comments and the spitting when dem > congresspeople baited the tea party protesters at the health care > vote.The fact that the dem baiting didn't provoke anything is > interesting enough, but the fact that lefties go to tea party rallies > and try to discredit the legit protesters there show the respect they > have for legit protest...only legit when done by the left! > > In any event, you prove the N word and spitting allegations and I'll > prove the dem organizers involvement in the dirty politics against the > tea party people. As usual, blog posts and hearsay don't count.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Then I'll assume your Michelle Malkin blog post supposedly proving left-wing infiltration of tea party rallies is not legitimate. |