Ken Pitts What do you think
in [Golf]
|
From: dene on 12 Apr 2010 23:19 "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:82hlf2F9tU1(a)mid.individual.net... > > "R&B" <none_of_your_business(a)all.com> wrote in message > news:201004121801001867-noneofyourbusiness(a)allcom... > > On 2010-04-12 10:51:12 -0400, MNMikeW said: > > > >> "R&B" <none_of_your_business(a)all.com> wrote in message > >> news:2010041122331717540-noneofyourbusiness(a)allcom... > >>> > >>> > >>> In general, I would agree. However, a new study released last week does > >>> point to strong evidence that race is a strong motivation for about 60 > >>> percent of those in the tea party. > >>> > >> Let's see it. This should be good. > >> > >>> > >>>> I work with > >>>> a number of people who attend these rallies. They are nothing like > >>>> that. They are demonstrating because they are Taxed Enough > >>>> Already. > >>> > >>> > >>> And those who feel that way have a legitimate argument. > >>> > >>> But you have your thick head in the sand if you haven't seen all the > >>> racist signs. > >>> > >>> > >> Lets see some of them then. > > > > > > You won't see them on FOX NEWS. They don't show them there. Doesn't fit > > their narrative. > > > > Randy > > > And I noticed you didn't post them here. Doesn't fit your narrative. He's showing himself as a liar, racist, and hater. -Greg
From: Moderate on 13 Apr 2010 06:37 "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote in message news:82i5v2FgkdU1(a)mid.individual.net... > > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote in message > news:82hlf2F9tU1(a)mid.individual.net... >> >> "R&B" <none_of_your_business(a)all.com> wrote in message >> news:201004121801001867-noneofyourbusiness(a)allcom... >> > On 2010-04-12 10:51:12 -0400, MNMikeW said: >> > >> >> "R&B" <none_of_your_business(a)all.com> wrote in message >> >> news:2010041122331717540-noneofyourbusiness(a)allcom... >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> In general, I would agree. However, a new study released last week > does >> >>> point to strong evidence that race is a strong motivation for about >> >>> 60 >> >>> percent of those in the tea party. >> >>> >> >> Let's see it. This should be good. >> >> >> >>> >> >>>> I work with >> >>>> a number of people who attend these rallies. They are nothing like >> >>>> that. They are demonstrating because they are Taxed Enough >> >>>> Already. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> And those who feel that way have a legitimate argument. >> >>> >> >>> But you have your thick head in the sand if you haven't seen all the >> >>> racist signs. >> >>> >> >>> >> >> Lets see some of them then. >> > >> > >> > You won't see them on FOX NEWS. They don't show them there. Doesn't > fit >> > their narrative. >> > >> > Randy >> > >> And I noticed you didn't post them here. Doesn't fit your narrative. > > He's showing himself as a liar, racist, and hater. > > -Greg Consumed by hate is a lousy way to go through life.
From: William Clark on 13 Apr 2010 08:17 In article <201004121801001867-noneofyourbusiness(a)allcom>, "R&B" <none_of_your_business(a)all.com> wrote: > On 2010-04-12 10:51:12 -0400, MNMikeW said: > > > "R&B" <none_of_your_business(a)all.com> wrote in message > > news:2010041122331717540-noneofyourbusiness(a)allcom... > >> > >> > >> In general, I would agree. However, a new study released last week > >> does point to strong evidence that race is a strong motivation for > >> about 60 percent of those in the tea party. > >> > > Let's see it. This should be good. > > > >> > >>> I work with > >>> a number of people who attend these rallies. They are nothing like > >>> that. They are demonstrating because they are Taxed Enough > >>> Already. > >> > >> > >> And those who feel that way have a legitimate argument. > >> > >> But you have your thick head in the sand if you haven't seen all the > >> racist signs. > >> > >> > > Lets see some of them then. > > > You won't see them on FOX NEWS. They don't show them there. Doesn't > fit their narrative. > > Randy Here's one for starters. No surprise that the guy is functionally illiterate, too. http://www.groundreport.com/includes/ajax/image_popup.php?image=2921697&i mage_id=1
From: The Bogeyman on 13 Apr 2010 09:26 On Apr 13, 8:17 am, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- state.edu> wrote: > In article <201004121801001867-noneofyourbusiness(a)allcom>, > > > > > > "R&B" <none_of_your_busin...(a)all.com> wrote: > > >Youwon't see them on FOX NEWS. They don't show them there. Doesn't > > fit their narrative. > > > Randy > > Here's one for starters. No surprise that the guy is functionally > illiterate, too. > > http://www.groundreport.com/includes/ajax/image_popup.php?image=29216.... > mage_id=1- Hide quoted text - > How is that "racist" when he is obviously applying the word to himself? It is just a crude way of comparing what the federal government does to taxpayers to what the antebellum plantation owners did to the slaves, i.e. profiting from their labor under the threat of violence. A word in an of itself is not "racist", you have to consider the context in which it is being used and the intent of the person using it. And I thought the self-labelled "progressives" understood the concept of nuance.
From: William Clark on 13 Apr 2010 11:09
In article <442e6f5d-87fc-4095-8c60-a5f3e2e094f5(a)x12g2000yqx.googlegroups.com>, The Bogeyman <thbgymn(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 13, 8:17�am, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- > state.edu> wrote: > > In article <201004121801001867-noneofyourbusiness(a)allcom>, > > > > > > > > > > > > �"R&B" <none of your busin...(a)all.com> wrote: > > > > >Youwon't see them on FOX NEWS. �They don't show them there. �Doesn't > > > fit their narrative. > > > > > Randy > > > > Here's one for starters. No surprise that the guy is functionally > > illiterate, too. > > > > http://www.groundreport.com/includes/ajax/image popup.php?image=29216... > > mage id=1- Hide quoted text - > > > > How is that "racist" when he is obviously applying the word to > himself? It is just a crude way of comparing what the federal > government does to taxpayers to what the antebellum plantation owners > did to the slaves, i.e. profiting from their labor under the threat of > violence. > > A word in an of itself is not "racist", you have to consider the > context in which it is being used and the intent of the person using > it. And I thought the self-labelled "progressives" understood the > concept of nuance. Of course you do, how silly of me to think that using the words "slavery" and "Niggar (sic)" has any racist implications. Tut, tut. |