Ken Pitts What do you think
in [Golf]
|
From: Alan Baker on 19 Apr 2010 12:33 In article <e8eeaa57-2b8f-4d46-afcc-d2925929042b(a)s9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>, Dinosaur_Sr <frostback(a)dukesofbiohazard.com> wrote: > On Apr 18, 10:28�pm, Howard Brazee <how...(a)brazee.net> wrote: > > On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 16:44:27 -0700 (PDT), Dinosaur_Sr > > > > <frostb...(a)dukesofbiohazard.com> wrote: > > >> Has anybody claimed that *anything* or *anyone* was all that is good > > >> in golf? > > > > >You don't think such claims have been made about Tiger Woods, and > > >cultivated by him as part of his IMG management? Part of Ken's issue > > >is that Tiger Woods is held up in such a manner...or at least was! > > > > That someone claimed that Jack or Arnie or Annika aren't good in golf? > > That taking my grandson to the par-3 course isn't good in golf? > > That learning to call rules on yourself isn't good in golf? > > > > No, I don't think anybody claimed that Tiger is "all that is good in > > golf". > > > > -- > > "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, > > than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace > > to the legislature, and not to the executive department." > > > > - James Madison > > I think the claim was made, Bully for you! To whom do you "think" you ascribe it? > and Woods did seem to be presenting > himself as a Bobby Jones/Jack Nicklaus kind of character. He wanted Really? How did he do that... ...aside from winning lots of golf tournaments. Got a quote? Anything? > that kind of credibility and respect. Throwing tantrums when you miss > a shot doesn't fit with that, in the eyes of a lot of people. Has > nothing to do with race, of course. LOL -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: dene on 19 Apr 2010 15:49 <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message news:grvms59v8etp6k2vaq7laea8vv8vdst6jm(a)4ax.com... > On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 14:50:53 -0700 (PDT), Dinosaur_Sr > <frostback(a)dukesofbiohazard.com> wrote: > I can name about a dozen that have left RSG specifically because of > you. Really good guys who are well respected. You've said that > you're glad they left. So its a push with us that I'm happy for > those who may say that they left because of me because IMO they were > probably dolts anyway. I thought your "respected" fellas left because of me? Damn! -Greg
From: bknight on 19 Apr 2010 15:48 On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:49:59 -0700, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > ><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >news:grvms59v8etp6k2vaq7laea8vv8vdst6jm(a)4ax.com... >> On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 14:50:53 -0700 (PDT), Dinosaur_Sr >> <frostback(a)dukesofbiohazard.com> wrote: > >> I can name about a dozen that have left RSG specifically because of >> you. Really good guys who are well respected. You've said that >> you're glad they left. So its a push with us that I'm happy for >> those who may say that they left because of me because IMO they were >> probably dolts anyway. > >I thought your "respected" fellas left because of me? Damn! > >-Greg > Nah. It was all because of Frostback. :-) BK
From: Moderate on 23 Apr 2010 16:00 "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 22, 3:00 pm, "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > > "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > news:68e573c6-0587-4f7d-adec-bdeb0d46bb34(a)k36g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > > > > What I find in quotes is this: "untalented overeducated > > fops, who quite often can barely play their instruments." This was a > > reference to jazz musicians. Is this your opinion, yes or no? > > *********************************************** > > > > He already said he did not. Who cares about his opinion of jazz > > musicians? > > > > I think you are just bored :-) > > What are you, the ref? > I am the adult.
From: Dinosaur_Sr on 22 Apr 2010 14:32
On Apr 22, 1:51 pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:49:51 -0700 (PDT), Dinosaur_Sr > > <frostb...(a)dukesofbiohazard.com> wrote: > > >Really? Cite the post then? I have never denied saying I could make > >the shot. I know I could make the shot. I always have. > > You're an idiot. You couldn't repeat it if you tried the rest of your > life. There ya go! The resort to personal insult, an admission that you were in fact lying, and cannot substantiate the lie because it is, in fact, a lie. > It's a video of ten of Tiger's greatest shots from the Golf Channel. > One of ten of his greatest shots, and you could do it? I don't watch the golf channel. I don't think it's that tough a shot, and I reserve the right to think for myself. You want to let the media tell you what to think...well that's none of my concern. > >At least you admit it. That's a step forward. > > Numbnuts. First you said that my education was poor, now I'm > over-educated. Then you say that I've admitted something? You're > getting to be disoriented. Another personal insult...you clearly didn't understand what I was saying...not much I can do about that. Lots of overeducated stupid people out there. > As have I. Remember the two degrees? So what? If you don't know the issue in question, you shouldn't comment on it. You could have 200 degrees, it would still beg the question. > > >You dismiss the theory that Eddie Taylor invented rock and roll, yet > >you don't even know what that theory is and why it's proponents make > >the claim. Why should I cite anything. You don't know what you are > >talking about in any case. > > Eddie Taylor was a Mississippi blues guitarist in the twenties, but > Rock and Roll? What the hell does that have to do with jazz? Besides, > its only one of a myriad of theories...but you've decided that it is > the correct one? More evidence you don't know what you are talking about. Eddie Taylor and Rock and Roll. Has nothing to do with the 1920's. It's the theory I accept. Doesn't mean anyone else has to accept it, but it is a legitimate theory with good substance to it...despite the fact you are totally unaware of it. One wonders why you would comment on it given you don't know anything about it...if they didn't know you! > > You were the one who trolled me Rob, by jumping into another's post > with hostile remarks about me, but then you have preferential > memories...... and hostilities. Nonsense. My first post to this thread was the 3rd posted. Your post #163 was an attack on me. I didn't even read it till just now. You really didn't like my post 213, but I was relating an honest belief I have about racist liberals. I had earlier commented that you generally offer nothing of substance, just criticism. Again, either that is legit or not. Anyone can read through the archive and see for themselves. > > I have the feeling that you made a downward move to this new school, > otherwise you'd be more than glad to reveal it. > What's a downward move? I moved because I wanted to move, to suit the life I want. If it is something you would choose not to do, then that gives me more evidence that I have made a good choice. In any event, it's irrelevant. |