From: The Bogeyman on 13 Apr 2010 12:53 On Apr 13, 12:10 pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:11:52 -0700, "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> > wrote: > > > > >"The Bogeyman" <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > >I will stop wasting my time. > > >-------------------------------------------------------------- > > >Another one has Uncle Al, the kiddy's pal, pegged. > > >-Greg > > C'mon Greg. I knowyouhate Baker, but please don't give this dolt > any props. He's an idiot. > > BK You lack the intellectual capacity to refute anything I've posted so you resort to name calling? My apologies, Alan, I guess arguing with the sagacity of a 12-year-old girl makes you the mature one in this bunch.
From: The Bogeyman on 13 Apr 2010 14:31 On Apr 13, 1:56 pm, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- state.edu> wrote: > > Good God, is this the bestyoucando? This sounds like something > straight out of the Holocaust deniers' handbook, it's so pathetic. > GODWINNED!!!!! Thread over.
From: William Clark on 13 Apr 2010 14:49 In article <3f71fee7-d1e9-4c93-ab1e-4b69b77e92e9(a)35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, The Bogeyman <thbgymn(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 13, 1:56�pm, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- > state.edu> wrote: > > > > > Good God, is this the bestyoucando? This sounds like something > > straight out of the Holocaust deniers' handbook, it's so pathetic. > > > > GODWINNED!!!!! > > Thread over. The only thread that is over is the thread of your mental capacity to make your "case". That ran out long ago.
From: John B. on 13 Apr 2010 16:46 On Apr 13, 9:26 am, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 13, 8:17 am, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- > > > > > > state.edu> wrote: > > In article <201004121801001867-noneofyourbusiness(a)allcom>, > > > "R&B" <none_of_your_busin...(a)all.com> wrote: > > > >Youwon't see them on FOX NEWS. They don't show them there. Doesn't > > > fit their narrative. > > > > Randy > > > Here's one for starters. No surprise that the guy is functionally > > illiterate, too. > > >http://www.groundreport.com/includes/ajax/image_popup.php?image=29216.... > > mage_id=1- Hide quoted text - > > How is that "racist" when he is obviously applying the word to > himself? It is just a crude way of comparing what the federal > government does to taxpayers to what the antebellum plantation owners > did to the slaves, i.e. profiting from their labor under the threat of > violence. > > A word in an of itself is not "racist", you have to consider the > context in which it is being used and the intent of the person using > it. And I thought the self-labelled "progressives" understood the > concept of nuance.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - I couldn't open William's link, but I do hope you're not really comparing the paying of taxes to slavery.
From: John B. on 13 Apr 2010 16:47
On Apr 13, 11:44 am, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 13, 11:09 am, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- > > > > > > state.edu> wrote: > > In article > > <442e6f5d-87fc-4095-8c60-a5f3e2e09...(a)x12g2000yqx.googlegroups.com>, > > The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Apr 13, 8:17 am, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- > > > state.edu> wrote: > > > > In article <201004121801001867-noneofyourbusiness(a)allcom>, > > > > > "R&B" <none of your busin...(a)all.com> wrote: > > > > > >Youwon't see them on FOX NEWS. They don't show them there. Doesn't > > > > > fit their narrative. > > > > > > Randy > > > > > Here's one for starters. No surprise that the guy is functionally > > > > illiterate, too. > > > > >http://www.groundreport.com/includes/ajax/imagepopup.php?image=29216... > > > > mage id=1- Hide quoted text - > > > > How is that "racist" when he is obviously applying the word to > > > himself? It is just a crude way of comparing what the federal > > > government does to taxpayers to what the antebellum plantation owners > > > did to the slaves, i.e. profiting from their labor under the threat of > > > violence. > > > > A word in an of itself is not "racist",youhave to consider the > > > context in which it is being used and the intent of the person using > > > it. And I thought the self-labelled "progressives" understood the > > > concept of nuance. > > > Of courseyoudo, how silly of me tothinkthat using the words > > "slavery" and "Niggar (sic)" has any racist implications. Tut, tut.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Methinks you need to study history, the word slavery has no racial > implications (unless you are narrow-minded). In the history of the > world many times more people of non-African descent have been bonded > into slavery than those of African descent. And that's not even > counting the current slaves in the USA having the fruits of their > labor confiscated by the federal government. Also, that is the first > time I have ever seen the word "niggar", what does that even mean?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Dude, you're the one that needs to study history if you think paying taxes is comparable to slavery, That's about the dumbest thing I've ever heard. |