From: The Bogeyman on
On Apr 13, 12:10 pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:11:52 -0700, "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >"The Bogeyman" <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> >I will stop wasting my time.
>
> >--------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >Another one has Uncle Al, the kiddy's pal, pegged.
>
> >-Greg
>
> C'mon Greg.  I knowyouhate Baker, but please don't give this dolt
> any props.  He's an idiot.
>
> BK

You lack the intellectual capacity to refute anything I've posted so
you resort to name calling? My apologies, Alan, I guess arguing with
the sagacity of a 12-year-old girl makes you the mature one in this
bunch.
From: The Bogeyman on
On Apr 13, 1:56 pm, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-
state.edu> wrote:

>
> Good God, is this the bestyoucando? This sounds like something
> straight out of the Holocaust deniers' handbook, it's so pathetic.
>

GODWINNED!!!!!

Thread over.
From: William Clark on
In article
<3f71fee7-d1e9-4c93-ab1e-4b69b77e92e9(a)35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>,
The Bogeyman <thbgymn(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> On Apr 13, 1:56�pm, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-
> state.edu> wrote:
>
> >
> > Good God, is this the bestyoucando? This sounds like something
> > straight out of the Holocaust deniers' handbook, it's so pathetic.
> >
>
> GODWINNED!!!!!
>
> Thread over.

The only thread that is over is the thread of your mental capacity to
make your "case". That ran out long ago.
From: John B. on
On Apr 13, 9:26 am, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 13, 8:17 am, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-
>
>
>
>
>
> state.edu> wrote:
> > In article <201004121801001867-noneofyourbusiness(a)allcom>,
>
> >  "R&B" <none_of_your_busin...(a)all.com> wrote:
>
> > >Youwon't see them on FOX NEWS.  They don't show them there.  Doesn't
> > > fit their narrative.
>
> > > Randy
>
> > Here's one for starters. No surprise that the guy is functionally
> > illiterate, too.
>
> >http://www.groundreport.com/includes/ajax/image_popup.php?image=29216....
> > mage_id=1- Hide quoted text -
>
> How is that "racist" when he is obviously applying the word to
> himself? It is just a crude way of comparing what the federal
> government does to taxpayers to what the antebellum plantation owners
> did to the slaves, i.e. profiting from their labor under the threat of
> violence.
>
> A word in an of itself is not "racist", you have to consider the
> context in which it is being used and the intent of the person using
> it. And I thought the self-labelled "progressives" understood the
> concept of nuance.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I couldn't open William's link, but I do hope you're not really
comparing the paying of taxes to slavery.
From: John B. on
On Apr 13, 11:44 am, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 13, 11:09 am, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-
>
>
>
>
>
> state.edu> wrote:
> > In article
> > <442e6f5d-87fc-4095-8c60-a5f3e2e09...(a)x12g2000yqx.googlegroups.com>,
> >  The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 13, 8:17 am, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-
> > > state.edu> wrote:
> > > > In article <201004121801001867-noneofyourbusiness(a)allcom>,
>
> > > >  "R&B" <none of your busin...(a)all.com> wrote:
>
> > > > >Youwon't see them on FOX NEWS.  They don't show them there.  Doesn't
> > > > > fit their narrative.
>
> > > > > Randy
>
> > > > Here's one for starters. No surprise that the guy is functionally
> > > > illiterate, too.
>
> > > >http://www.groundreport.com/includes/ajax/imagepopup.php?image=29216...
> > > > mage id=1- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > How is that "racist" when he is obviously applying the word to
> > > himself? It is just a crude way of comparing what the federal
> > > government does to taxpayers to what the antebellum plantation owners
> > > did to the slaves, i.e. profiting from their labor under the threat of
> > > violence.
>
> > > A word in an of itself is not "racist",youhave to consider the
> > > context in which it is being used and the intent of the person using
> > > it. And I thought the self-labelled "progressives" understood the
> > > concept of nuance.
>
> > Of courseyoudo, how silly of me tothinkthat using the words
> > "slavery" and "Niggar (sic)" has any racist implications. Tut, tut.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Methinks you need to study history, the word slavery has no racial
> implications (unless you are narrow-minded). In the history of the
> world many times more people of non-African descent have been bonded
> into slavery than those of African descent. And that's not even
> counting the current slaves in the USA having the fruits of their
> labor confiscated by the federal government. Also, that is the first
> time I have ever seen the word "niggar", what does that even mean?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Dude, you're the one that needs to study history if you think paying
taxes is comparable to slavery, That's about the dumbest thing I've
ever heard.