From: dene on

"MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote in message
news:82jtqhFtcvU1(a)mid.individual.net...
>

> >>
> >> "Whenever possible, we will act on behalf of the Tea Party in ways
> >> which exaggerate their least appealing qualities (misspelled protest
> >> signs, wild claims in TV interviews, etc.) to further distance them
> >> from mainstream America and damage the public�s opinion of them. We
> >> will also use the inside information that we have gained in order to
> >> disrupt and derail their plans."
> >>
> >> I don't know, to me it looks like that's exactly what the sign man did.
> >
> > Of course it looks to you like that. How else can you explain away this
> > truly offensive sign? God, I'd hat to have to make excuses someone like
> > this.
>
> Once more in English.

A hardy har har for the man from Minnie-soda!

-Greg


From: Alan Baker on
In article <82kf24FgjU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
"dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote:

> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message
> news:alangbaker-9DF94D.16575213042010(a)news.shawcable.com...
> > In article <1i0as5p0cm8nn0tts9apimem8rqvvdv70a(a)4ax.com>,
> > bknight(a)conramp.net wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:44:06 -0700 (PDT), kenpitts
> > > <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >On Apr 13, 11:10 am, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote:
> > > >> On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:11:52 -0700, "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> >"The Bogeyman" <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> > > >> >I will stop wasting my time.
> > > >>
> > > >> >--------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>
> > > >> >Another one has Uncle Al, the kiddy's pal, pegged.
> > > >>
> > > >> >-Greg
> > > >>
> > > >> C'mon Greg. I know you hate Baker, but please don't give this dolt
> > > >> any props. He's an idiot.
> > > >>
> > > >> BK
> > > >
> > > >Finally, Bobby recognizes this guy for what he is.
> > > >
> > > >Ken
> > >
> > > You realize that I was referring to "The Bogeyman" don't you Ken?
> > >
> > > I do fault Baker for his continuing the no-win argument with you over
> > > TW's language, although his points are well taken.
> >
> > I enjoy watching hypocrites twist in the wind, Bobby.
> >
> > Ken wants to inflict his already perfectly well-understood opinion of
> > Tiger on RSG over and over, but he whines like a child when I give him
> > back just a taste of his own medicine.
>
> KP's only mistake is that he responds to you. Nobody else takes you
> seriously.

Ken does because he's in love with his own self-created martyrdom.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
<http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: The Bogeyman on
On Apr 13, 7:44 pm, kenpitts <ken.p...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 13, 11:10 am, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:11:52 -0700, "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > >"The Bogeyman" <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> > >I will stop wasting my time.
>
> > >--------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > >Another one has Uncle Al, the kiddy's pal, pegged.
>
> > >-Greg
>
> > C'mon Greg.  I knowyouhate Baker, but please don't give this dolt
> > any props.  He's an idiot.
>
> > BK
>
> Finally, Bobby recognizes this guy for what he is.
>
> Ken- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Et tu, Ken? Then fall, Bogeyman!
From: William Clark on
In article <MPG.262ebc2e89c691b2989dde(a)news.giganews.com>,
BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:

> In article <a222db0b-b3e2-4daa-bff3-417789d776a9
> @y17g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says...
> >
> > On Apr 13, 9:26�am, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Apr 13, 8:17�am, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > state.edu> wrote:
> > > > In article <201004121801001867-noneofyourbusiness(a)allcom>,
> > >
> > > > �"R&B" <none_of_your_busin...(a)all.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > >Youwon't see them on FOX NEWS. �They don't show them there. �Doesn't
> > > > > fit their narrative.
> > >
> > > > > Randy
> > >
> > > > Here's one for starters. No surprise that the guy is functionally
> > > > illiterate, too.
> > >
> > > >http://www.groundreport.com/includes/ajax/image_popup.php?image=29216...
> > > > mage_id=1- Hide quoted text -
> > >
> > > How is that "racist" when he is obviously applying the word to
> > > himself? It is just a crude way of comparing what the federal
> > > government does to taxpayers to what the antebellum plantation owners
> > > did to the slaves, i.e. profiting from their labor under the threat of
> > > violence.
> > >
> > > A word in an of itself is not "racist", you have to consider the
> > > context in which it is being used and the intent of the person using
> > > it. And I thought the self-labelled "progressives" understood the
> > > concept of nuance.- Hide quoted text -
> > >
> > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > I couldn't open William's link, but I do hope you're not really
> > comparing the paying of taxes to slavery.

For Alan, here is another link to this intellectual giant:

http://wonkette.com/413001/its-2010s-hottest-tea-party-leader-dale-robert
son
From: William Clark on
In article <MPG.262ec78661bb5dda989ddf(a)news.giganews.com>,
BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:

> In article <82jtqhFtcvU1(a)mid.individual.net>, MNMiikkew(a)aol.com says...
> > >> Straight from crashtheteaparty.org:
> > >>
> > >> "Whenever possible, we will act on behalf of the Tea Party in ways
> > >> which exaggerate their least appealing qualities (misspelled protest
> > >> signs, wild claims in TV interviews, etc.) to further distance them
> > >> from mainstream America and damage the public1s opinion of them. We
> > >> will also use the inside information that we have gained in order to
> > >> disrupt and derail their plans."
> > >>
> > >> I don't know, to me it looks like that's exactly what the sign man did.
> > >
> > > Of course it looks to you like that. How else can you explain away this
> > > truly offensive sign? God, I'd hat to have to make excuses someone like
> > > this.
> >
> > Once more in English.
>
> You may want to wait until morning. I don't think Billy has to teach any
> classes this afternoon, if you know what I mean...

Well, what exactly DO you mean . . . ?