From: dene on 13 Apr 2010 20:08 "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:82jtqhFtcvU1(a)mid.individual.net... > > >> > >> "Whenever possible, we will act on behalf of the Tea Party in ways > >> which exaggerate their least appealing qualities (misspelled protest > >> signs, wild claims in TV interviews, etc.) to further distance them > >> from mainstream America and damage the public�s opinion of them. We > >> will also use the inside information that we have gained in order to > >> disrupt and derail their plans." > >> > >> I don't know, to me it looks like that's exactly what the sign man did. > > > > Of course it looks to you like that. How else can you explain away this > > truly offensive sign? God, I'd hat to have to make excuses someone like > > this. > > Once more in English. A hardy har har for the man from Minnie-soda! -Greg
From: Alan Baker on 13 Apr 2010 20:05 In article <82kf24FgjU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > news:alangbaker-9DF94D.16575213042010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > In article <1i0as5p0cm8nn0tts9apimem8rqvvdv70a(a)4ax.com>, > > bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:44:06 -0700 (PDT), kenpitts > > > <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > >On Apr 13, 11:10 am, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:11:52 -0700, "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >"The Bogeyman" <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > >> >I will stop wasting my time. > > > >> > > > >> >-------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > > > >> >Another one has Uncle Al, the kiddy's pal, pegged. > > > >> > > > >> >-Greg > > > >> > > > >> C'mon Greg. I know you hate Baker, but please don't give this dolt > > > >> any props. He's an idiot. > > > >> > > > >> BK > > > > > > > >Finally, Bobby recognizes this guy for what he is. > > > > > > > >Ken > > > > > > You realize that I was referring to "The Bogeyman" don't you Ken? > > > > > > I do fault Baker for his continuing the no-win argument with you over > > > TW's language, although his points are well taken. > > > > I enjoy watching hypocrites twist in the wind, Bobby. > > > > Ken wants to inflict his already perfectly well-understood opinion of > > Tiger on RSG over and over, but he whines like a child when I give him > > back just a taste of his own medicine. > > KP's only mistake is that he responds to you. Nobody else takes you > seriously. Ken does because he's in love with his own self-created martyrdom. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: The Bogeyman on 13 Apr 2010 20:12 On Apr 13, 7:44 pm, kenpitts <ken.p...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 13, 11:10 am, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:11:52 -0700, "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> > > wrote: > > > >"The Bogeyman" <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > >I will stop wasting my time. > > > >-------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >Another one has Uncle Al, the kiddy's pal, pegged. > > > >-Greg > > > C'mon Greg. I knowyouhate Baker, but please don't give this dolt > > any props. He's an idiot. > > > BK > > Finally, Bobby recognizes this guy for what he is. > > Ken- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Et tu, Ken? Then fall, Bogeyman!
From: William Clark on 13 Apr 2010 21:10 In article <MPG.262ebc2e89c691b2989dde(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <a222db0b-b3e2-4daa-bff3-417789d776a9 > @y17g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says... > > > > On Apr 13, 9:26�am, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Apr 13, 8:17�am, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > state.edu> wrote: > > > > In article <201004121801001867-noneofyourbusiness(a)allcom>, > > > > > > > �"R&B" <none_of_your_busin...(a)all.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >Youwon't see them on FOX NEWS. �They don't show them there. �Doesn't > > > > > fit their narrative. > > > > > > > > Randy > > > > > > > Here's one for starters. No surprise that the guy is functionally > > > > illiterate, too. > > > > > > >http://www.groundreport.com/includes/ajax/image_popup.php?image=29216... > > > > mage_id=1- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > How is that "racist" when he is obviously applying the word to > > > himself? It is just a crude way of comparing what the federal > > > government does to taxpayers to what the antebellum plantation owners > > > did to the slaves, i.e. profiting from their labor under the threat of > > > violence. > > > > > > A word in an of itself is not "racist", you have to consider the > > > context in which it is being used and the intent of the person using > > > it. And I thought the self-labelled "progressives" understood the > > > concept of nuance.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > I couldn't open William's link, but I do hope you're not really > > comparing the paying of taxes to slavery. For Alan, here is another link to this intellectual giant: http://wonkette.com/413001/its-2010s-hottest-tea-party-leader-dale-robert son
From: William Clark on 13 Apr 2010 21:11
In article <MPG.262ec78661bb5dda989ddf(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <82jtqhFtcvU1(a)mid.individual.net>, MNMiikkew(a)aol.com says... > > >> Straight from crashtheteaparty.org: > > >> > > >> "Whenever possible, we will act on behalf of the Tea Party in ways > > >> which exaggerate their least appealing qualities (misspelled protest > > >> signs, wild claims in TV interviews, etc.) to further distance them > > >> from mainstream America and damage the public1s opinion of them. We > > >> will also use the inside information that we have gained in order to > > >> disrupt and derail their plans." > > >> > > >> I don't know, to me it looks like that's exactly what the sign man did. > > > > > > Of course it looks to you like that. How else can you explain away this > > > truly offensive sign? God, I'd hat to have to make excuses someone like > > > this. > > > > Once more in English. > > You may want to wait until morning. I don't think Billy has to teach any > classes this afternoon, if you know what I mean... Well, what exactly DO you mean . . . ? |