From: dene on 14 Apr 2010 03:49 "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message news:alangbaker-2B261B.17051713042010(a)news.shawcable.com... > In article <82kf24FgjU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > > news:alangbaker-9DF94D.16575213042010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > > In article <1i0as5p0cm8nn0tts9apimem8rqvvdv70a(a)4ax.com>, > > > bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:44:06 -0700 (PDT), kenpitts > > > > <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > >On Apr 13, 11:10 am, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > > > > >> On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:11:52 -0700, "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> >"The Bogeyman" <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > >> >I will stop wasting my time. > > > > >> > > > > >> >-------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >> > > > > >> >Another one has Uncle Al, the kiddy's pal, pegged. > > > > >> > > > > >> >-Greg > > > > >> > > > > >> C'mon Greg. I know you hate Baker, but please don't give this dolt > > > > >> any props. He's an idiot. > > > > >> > > > > >> BK > > > > > > > > > >Finally, Bobby recognizes this guy for what he is. > > > > > > > > > >Ken > > > > > > > > You realize that I was referring to "The Bogeyman" don't you Ken? > > > > > > > > I do fault Baker for his continuing the no-win argument with you over > > > > TW's language, although his points are well taken. > > > > > > I enjoy watching hypocrites twist in the wind, Bobby. > > > > > > Ken wants to inflict his already perfectly well-understood opinion of > > > Tiger on RSG over and over, but he whines like a child when I give him > > > back just a taste of his own medicine. > > > > KP's only mistake is that he responds to you. Nobody else takes you > > seriously. > > Ken does because he's in love with his own self-created martyrdom. And this justifies the fact that your post is always the first one under his posts? You might be partially right that the martyrdom bit but that doesn't excuse the obsessive Jones you have for him. Ever consider to live and let live or is being a gnat the essence of your MO here? -Greg
From: dene on 14 Apr 2010 03:50 "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message news:wclark2-21D39D.21152913042010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > No, from where I see it, he is simply calling out a coward. > > > > Of course you see it that way. You and him are of the same ilk. > > > > -Greg > > That, of course, should be "you and he" when they are the subject of the > sentence. Sigh. Zzzzzzzzzz........ -Greg
From: Alan Baker on 14 Apr 2010 04:04 In article <82la4mF4s2U1(a)mid.individual.net>, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > news:alangbaker-2B261B.17051713042010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > In article <82kf24FgjU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > > > > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > > > news:alangbaker-9DF94D.16575213042010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > > > In article <1i0as5p0cm8nn0tts9apimem8rqvvdv70a(a)4ax.com>, > > > > bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:44:06 -0700 (PDT), kenpitts > > > > > <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >On Apr 13, 11:10 am, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > > > > > >> On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:11:52 -0700, "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> >"The Bogeyman" <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > > >> >I will stop wasting my time. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> >-------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > >> > > > > > >> >Another one has Uncle Al, the kiddy's pal, pegged. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> >-Greg > > > > > >> > > > > > >> C'mon Greg. I know you hate Baker, but please don't give this > dolt > > > > > >> any props. He's an idiot. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> BK > > > > > > > > > > > >Finally, Bobby recognizes this guy for what he is. > > > > > > > > > > > >Ken > > > > > > > > > > You realize that I was referring to "The Bogeyman" don't you Ken? > > > > > > > > > > I do fault Baker for his continuing the no-win argument with you > over > > > > > TW's language, although his points are well taken. > > > > > > > > I enjoy watching hypocrites twist in the wind, Bobby. > > > > > > > > Ken wants to inflict his already perfectly well-understood opinion of > > > > Tiger on RSG over and over, but he whines like a child when I give him > > > > back just a taste of his own medicine. > > > > > > KP's only mistake is that he responds to you. Nobody else takes you > > > seriously. > > > > Ken does because he's in love with his own self-created martyrdom. > > And this justifies the fact that your post is always the first one under his > posts? You might be partially right that the martyrdom bit but that doesn't > excuse the obsessive Jones you have for him. Ever consider to live and let > live or is being a gnat the essence of your MO here? Hell. Sometimes I ignore Ken completely, but at the moment, since he is so determined to annoy so many with his repetitious posting of his opinions on Tiger Woods, it amuses me to return serve. When it ceases to be amusing, then I won't post. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: William Clark on 14 Apr 2010 07:59 In article <82la6qF56nU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message > news:wclark2-21D39D.21152913042010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > > > No, from where I see it, he is simply calling out a coward. > > > > > > Of course you see it that way. You and him are of the same ilk. > > > > > > -Greg > > > > That, of course, should be "you and he" when they are the subject of the > > sentence. Sigh. > > Zzzzzzzzzz........ > > -Greg Indeed, you clearly did sleep through English language classes. Among others :-)
From: dene on 14 Apr 2010 13:03
"Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message news:alangbaker-C3580A.01044714042010(a)news.shawcable.com... > In article <82la4mF4s2U1(a)mid.individual.net>, > > > > > > > > KP's only mistake is that he responds to you. Nobody else takes you > > > > seriously. > > > > > > Ken does because he's in love with his own self-created martyrdom. > > > > And this justifies the fact that your post is always the first one under his > > posts? You might be partially right that the martyrdom bit but that doesn't > > excuse the obsessive Jones you have for him. Ever consider to live and let > > live or is being a gnat the essence of your MO here? > > Hell. Sometimes I ignore Ken completely, but at the moment, since he is > so determined to annoy so many with his repetitious posting of his > opinions on Tiger Woods, it amuses me to return serve. > > When it ceases to be amusing, then I won't post. I guarantee you annoy more people than he does. -Greg |