Ken's not going to like this
in [Golf]
|
Prev: Support Sharon Angle
Next: Hey democrats
From: Alan Baker on 19 Jul 2010 05:16 In article <8aie78FglmU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > LOL, troll. > > -Greg So when you can't actually deal with things, just start in with the insults, right Greg? -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: dsc-ky on 19 Jul 2010 10:04 On Jul 19, 2:30 am, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > In article <8ai8omFhl...(a)mid.individual.net>, > I just said that people are of course allowed to believe what they want > to believe and they're of course allowed to express their beliefs. Why doesn't that apply to Ken wrt Tiger? dsc
From: bknight on 19 Jul 2010 10:25 On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 07:04:19 -0700 (PDT), dsc-ky <Dudley.Cornman(a)eku.edu> wrote: >On Jul 19, 2:30�am, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: >> In article <8ai8omFhl...(a)mid.individual.net>, > >> I just said that people are of course allowed to believe what they want >> to believe and they're of course allowed to express their beliefs. > >Why doesn't that apply to Ken wrt Tiger? > >dsc Look at it this way Dudley; you agree with Ken as well as many others do, but we haven't seen you, or anyone else, bring it up ad infinitum for over a dozen years. Just Ken. Tiger's rants are a pain. Ken's rants about Tiger are a pain. We can't tell Tiger. We can tell Ken. BK
From: Dene on 19 Jul 2010 11:34 On Jul 19, 2:16 am, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > In article <8aie78Fgl...(a)mid.individual.net>, > > "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > LOL, troll. > > > -Greg > > So when you can't actually deal with things, just start in with the > insults, right Greg? So when you can't actually deal with things, you use the acronym LOL, right troll? -Greg
From: dsc-ky on 19 Jul 2010 13:12
On Jul 19, 10:25 am, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 07:04:19 -0700 (PDT), dsc-ky > > <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote: > >On Jul 19, 2:30 am, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > >> In article <8ai8omFhl...(a)mid.individual.net>, > > >> I just said that people are of course allowed to believe what they want > >> to believe and they're of course allowed to express their beliefs. > > >Why doesn't that apply to Ken wrt Tiger? > > >dsc > > Look at it this way Dudley; you agree with Ken as well as many others > do, but we haven't seen you, or anyone else, bring it up ad infinitum > for over a dozen years. Just Ken. > He is persistent... > Tiger's rants are a pain. > Ken's rants about Tiger are a pain. Are rants about Ken also a pain? :) Yea, we've been through it a hundred times or more. We all know where everyone else stands on the matter. Everyone is pretty well entrentched... and not going to budge. It's pretty much a stalemate. :) |