Ken's not going to like this
in [Golf]
|
Prev: Support Sharon Angle
Next: Hey democrats
From: dsc-ky on 19 Jul 2010 13:18 > You could live the rest of your life without any ill effects > if you never had contact with anyone from this group Doesn't that pretty much go for all of us?
From: Alan Baker on 19 Jul 2010 13:28 In article <29590448-63a4-4b5f-9763-70630fe21e39(a)e5g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>, dsc-ky <Dudley.Cornman(a)eku.edu> wrote: > On Jul 19, 2:30�am, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > > In article <8ai8omFhl...(a)mid.individual.net>, > > > I just said that people are of course allowed to believe what they want > > to believe and they're of course allowed to express their beliefs. > > Why doesn't that apply to Ken wrt Tiger? > > dsc It does of course... ....but it also applies to everyone else to whom he has expressed that belief. What Ken wants is the right to express himself with no one allowed to express themselves about what he *chooses* to post. Everyone knows Ken's beliefs of the subject, Dudley. He has chosen to inflict them on people he calls friends over and over and over and over... ....I can't write that sentence long enough. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Alan Baker on 19 Jul 2010 13:29 In article <d53a3e41-77e2-4e60-9cfa-2c1c431ef7e7(a)z34g2000pro.googlegroups.com>, Dene <gdstrue(a)aol.com> wrote: > On Jul 19, 2:16�am, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > > In article <8aie78Fgl...(a)mid.individual.net>, > > > > �"dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > > LOL, troll. > > > > > -Greg > > > > So when you can't actually deal with things, just start in with the > > insults, right Greg? > > So when you can't actually deal with things, you use the acronym LOL, > right troll? > > -Greg Nope. I use the acronym LOL to indicate that I'm laughing... ....and I don't have to hide what I claim to be laughing about. :-) -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Carbon on 19 Jul 2010 23:39 On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:25:54 -0500, bknight wrote: > Look at it this way Dudley; you agree with Ken as well as many others > do, but we haven't seen you, or anyone else, bring it up ad infinitum > for over a dozen years. Just Ken. > > Tiger's rants are a pain. > Ken's rants about Tiger are a pain. > We can't tell Tiger. > We can tell Ken. It is ironic. Ken has his panties all in a bunch over Tiger and somehow doesn't see that he is doing essentially the same thing.
From: MNMikeW on 20 Jul 2010 10:08
"Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message news:4c451a86$0$4826$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:25:54 -0500, bknight wrote: > >> Look at it this way Dudley; you agree with Ken as well as many others >> do, but we haven't seen you, or anyone else, bring it up ad infinitum >> for over a dozen years. Just Ken. >> >> Tiger's rants are a pain. >> Ken's rants about Tiger are a pain. >> We can't tell Tiger. >> We can tell Ken. > > It is ironic. Ken has his panties all in a bunch over Tiger and somehow > doesn't see that he is doing essentially the same thing. How is that exactly? |