Prev: Support Sharon Angle
Next: Hey democrats
From: Alan Baker on 20 Jul 2010 11:53 In article <8alovsFq4iU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > news:4c451a86$0$4826$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > > On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:25:54 -0500, bknight wrote: > > > >> Look at it this way Dudley; you agree with Ken as well as many others > >> do, but we haven't seen you, or anyone else, bring it up ad infinitum > >> for over a dozen years. Just Ken. > >> > >> Tiger's rants are a pain. > >> Ken's rants about Tiger are a pain. > >> We can't tell Tiger. > >> We can tell Ken. > > > > It is ironic. Ken has his panties all in a bunch over Tiger and somehow > > doesn't see that he is doing essentially the same thing. > > How is that exactly? Oh, come on, Mike... -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Carbon on 20 Jul 2010 19:52 On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:08:59 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > news:4c451a86$0$4826$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >> On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:25:54 -0500, bknight wrote: >> >>> Look at it this way Dudley; you agree with Ken as well as many >>> others do, but we haven't seen you, or anyone else, bring it up ad >>> infinitum for over a dozen years. Just Ken. >>> >>> Tiger's rants are a pain. Ken's rants about Tiger are a pain. We >>> can't tell Tiger. We can tell Ken. >> >> It is ironic. Ken has his panties all in a bunch over Tiger and >> somehow doesn't see that he is doing essentially the same thing. > > How is that exactly? He knows he is annoying people with his behavior and he doesn't care.
From: William Clark on 20 Jul 2010 21:16 In article <4c4636c9$0$4834$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:08:59 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > > news:4c451a86$0$4826$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > >> On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:25:54 -0500, bknight wrote: > >> > >>> Look at it this way Dudley; you agree with Ken as well as many > >>> others do, but we haven't seen you, or anyone else, bring it up ad > >>> infinitum for over a dozen years. Just Ken. > >>> > >>> Tiger's rants are a pain. Ken's rants about Tiger are a pain. We > >>> can't tell Tiger. We can tell Ken. > >> > >> It is ironic. Ken has his panties all in a bunch over Tiger and > >> somehow doesn't see that he is doing essentially the same thing. > > > > How is that exactly? > > He knows he is annoying people with his behavior and he doesn't care. Yes, it's like the neighbours dog that pees on your front lawn every morning.
From: MNMikeW on 21 Jul 2010 11:44 "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message news:4c4636c9$0$4834$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:08:59 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: >> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >> news:4c451a86$0$4826$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >>> On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:25:54 -0500, bknight wrote: >>> >>>> Look at it this way Dudley; you agree with Ken as well as many >>>> others do, but we haven't seen you, or anyone else, bring it up ad >>>> infinitum for over a dozen years. Just Ken. >>>> >>>> Tiger's rants are a pain. Ken's rants about Tiger are a pain. We >>>> can't tell Tiger. We can tell Ken. >>> >>> It is ironic. Ken has his panties all in a bunch over Tiger and >>> somehow doesn't see that he is doing essentially the same thing. >> >> How is that exactly? > > He knows he is annoying people with his behavior and he doesn't care. I think the people who jump all over Ken are annoying.
From: Alan Baker on 21 Jul 2010 12:08
In article <8aoiuvFtq7U1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > news:4c4636c9$0$4834$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > > On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:08:59 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > >> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > >> news:4c451a86$0$4826$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > >>> On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:25:54 -0500, bknight wrote: > >>> > >>>> Look at it this way Dudley; you agree with Ken as well as many > >>>> others do, but we haven't seen you, or anyone else, bring it up ad > >>>> infinitum for over a dozen years. Just Ken. > >>>> > >>>> Tiger's rants are a pain. Ken's rants about Tiger are a pain. We > >>>> can't tell Tiger. We can tell Ken. > >>> > >>> It is ironic. Ken has his panties all in a bunch over Tiger and > >>> somehow doesn't see that he is doing essentially the same thing. > >> > >> How is that exactly? > > > > He knows he is annoying people with his behavior and he doesn't care. > > I think the people who jump all over Ken are annoying. You're just saying that to be contrary. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg> |