From: Alan Baker on
In article <8alovsFq4iU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
"MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote:

> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:4c451a86$0$4826$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
> > On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:25:54 -0500, bknight wrote:
> >
> >> Look at it this way Dudley; you agree with Ken as well as many others
> >> do, but we haven't seen you, or anyone else, bring it up ad infinitum
> >> for over a dozen years. Just Ken.
> >>
> >> Tiger's rants are a pain.
> >> Ken's rants about Tiger are a pain.
> >> We can't tell Tiger.
> >> We can tell Ken.
> >
> > It is ironic. Ken has his panties all in a bunch over Tiger and somehow
> > doesn't see that he is doing essentially the same thing.
>
> How is that exactly?

Oh, come on, Mike...

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
<http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Carbon on
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:08:59 -0500, MNMikeW wrote:
> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:4c451a86$0$4826$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>> On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:25:54 -0500, bknight wrote:
>>
>>> Look at it this way Dudley; you agree with Ken as well as many
>>> others do, but we haven't seen you, or anyone else, bring it up ad
>>> infinitum for over a dozen years. Just Ken.
>>>
>>> Tiger's rants are a pain. Ken's rants about Tiger are a pain. We
>>> can't tell Tiger. We can tell Ken.
>>
>> It is ironic. Ken has his panties all in a bunch over Tiger and
>> somehow doesn't see that he is doing essentially the same thing.
>
> How is that exactly?

He knows he is annoying people with his behavior and he doesn't care.
From: William Clark on
In article <4c4636c9$0$4834$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>,
Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:08:59 -0500, MNMikeW wrote:
> > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
> > news:4c451a86$0$4826$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
> >> On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:25:54 -0500, bknight wrote:
> >>
> >>> Look at it this way Dudley; you agree with Ken as well as many
> >>> others do, but we haven't seen you, or anyone else, bring it up ad
> >>> infinitum for over a dozen years. Just Ken.
> >>>
> >>> Tiger's rants are a pain. Ken's rants about Tiger are a pain. We
> >>> can't tell Tiger. We can tell Ken.
> >>
> >> It is ironic. Ken has his panties all in a bunch over Tiger and
> >> somehow doesn't see that he is doing essentially the same thing.
> >
> > How is that exactly?
>
> He knows he is annoying people with his behavior and he doesn't care.

Yes, it's like the neighbours dog that pees on your front lawn every
morning.
From: MNMikeW on

"Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:4c4636c9$0$4834$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:08:59 -0500, MNMikeW wrote:
>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
>> news:4c451a86$0$4826$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>>> On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:25:54 -0500, bknight wrote:
>>>
>>>> Look at it this way Dudley; you agree with Ken as well as many
>>>> others do, but we haven't seen you, or anyone else, bring it up ad
>>>> infinitum for over a dozen years. Just Ken.
>>>>
>>>> Tiger's rants are a pain. Ken's rants about Tiger are a pain. We
>>>> can't tell Tiger. We can tell Ken.
>>>
>>> It is ironic. Ken has his panties all in a bunch over Tiger and
>>> somehow doesn't see that he is doing essentially the same thing.
>>
>> How is that exactly?
>
> He knows he is annoying people with his behavior and he doesn't care.

I think the people who jump all over Ken are annoying.


From: Alan Baker on
In article <8aoiuvFtq7U1(a)mid.individual.net>,
"MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote:

> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:4c4636c9$0$4834$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
> > On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:08:59 -0500, MNMikeW wrote:
> >> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
> >> news:4c451a86$0$4826$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
> >>> On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:25:54 -0500, bknight wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Look at it this way Dudley; you agree with Ken as well as many
> >>>> others do, but we haven't seen you, or anyone else, bring it up ad
> >>>> infinitum for over a dozen years. Just Ken.
> >>>>
> >>>> Tiger's rants are a pain. Ken's rants about Tiger are a pain. We
> >>>> can't tell Tiger. We can tell Ken.
> >>>
> >>> It is ironic. Ken has his panties all in a bunch over Tiger and
> >>> somehow doesn't see that he is doing essentially the same thing.
> >>
> >> How is that exactly?
> >
> > He knows he is annoying people with his behavior and he doesn't care.
>
> I think the people who jump all over Ken are annoying.

You're just saying that to be contrary.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
<http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Prev: Support Sharon Angle
Next: Hey democrats