Prev: Support Sharon Angle
Next: Hey democrats
From: MNMikeW on 21 Jul 2010 12:50 "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message news:alangbaker-2127AD.09084021072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > In article <8aoiuvFtq7U1(a)mid.individual.net>, > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >> news:4c4636c9$0$4834$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >> > On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:08:59 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: >> >> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >> >> news:4c451a86$0$4826$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >> >>> On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:25:54 -0500, bknight wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Look at it this way Dudley; you agree with Ken as well as many >> >>>> others do, but we haven't seen you, or anyone else, bring it up ad >> >>>> infinitum for over a dozen years. Just Ken. >> >>>> >> >>>> Tiger's rants are a pain. Ken's rants about Tiger are a pain. We >> >>>> can't tell Tiger. We can tell Ken. >> >>> >> >>> It is ironic. Ken has his panties all in a bunch over Tiger and >> >>> somehow doesn't see that he is doing essentially the same thing. >> >> >> >> How is that exactly? >> > >> > He knows he is annoying people with his behavior and he doesn't care. >> >> I think the people who jump all over Ken are annoying. > > You're just saying that to be contrary. > LOL as you would say annoying one.
From: Alan Baker on 21 Jul 2010 12:54 In article <8aomqqFmbtU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > news:alangbaker-2127AD.09084021072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > In article <8aoiuvFtq7U1(a)mid.individual.net>, > > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > >> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > >> news:4c4636c9$0$4834$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > >> > On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:08:59 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > >> >> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > >> >> news:4c451a86$0$4826$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > >> >>> On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:25:54 -0500, bknight wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>>> Look at it this way Dudley; you agree with Ken as well as many > >> >>>> others do, but we haven't seen you, or anyone else, bring it up ad > >> >>>> infinitum for over a dozen years. Just Ken. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Tiger's rants are a pain. Ken's rants about Tiger are a pain. We > >> >>>> can't tell Tiger. We can tell Ken. > >> >>> > >> >>> It is ironic. Ken has his panties all in a bunch over Tiger and > >> >>> somehow doesn't see that he is doing essentially the same thing. > >> >> > >> >> How is that exactly? > >> > > >> > He knows he is annoying people with his behavior and he doesn't care. > >> > >> I think the people who jump all over Ken are annoying. > > > > You're just saying that to be contrary. > > > LOL as you would say annoying one. Your grammar is as poor as your thinking. Ken has stated his opinion. Everyone knows Ken's opinion. Nearly everyone has told Ken they know his opinion and that they don't want to hear it again. So when Ken posts, he creates the annoyance. Replying to that is no different than slapping a mosquito that has bitten one. It is the mosquito that is to blame. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Moderate on 21 Jul 2010 14:58 "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message news:alangbaker-EB493D.09542821072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > In article <8aomqqFmbtU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message >> news:alangbaker-2127AD.09084021072010(a)news.shawcable.com... >> > >> > You're just saying that to be contrary. >> > >> LOL as you would say annoying one. > > Your grammar is as poor as your thinking. > > Ken has stated his opinion. > > Everyone knows Ken's opinion. > > Nearly everyone has told Ken they know his opinion and that they don't > want to hear it again. > > So when Ken posts, he creates the annoyance. Replying to that is no > different than slapping a mosquito that has bitten one. It is the > mosquito that is to blame. Everyone knows your opinion as well :-)
From: MNMikeW on 21 Jul 2010 15:18 "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote in message news:i27g09$7uc$1(a)speranza.aioe.org... > > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > news:alangbaker-EB493D.09542821072010(a)news.shawcable.com... >> In article <8aomqqFmbtU1(a)mid.individual.net>, >> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >> >>> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message >>> news:alangbaker-2127AD.09084021072010(a)news.shawcable.com... >>> > >>> > You're just saying that to be contrary. >>> > >>> LOL as you would say annoying one. >> >> Your grammar is as poor as your thinking. >> >> Ken has stated his opinion. >> >> Everyone knows Ken's opinion. >> >> Nearly everyone has told Ken they know his opinion and that they don't >> want to hear it again. >> >> So when Ken posts, he creates the annoyance. Replying to that is no >> different than slapping a mosquito that has bitten one. It is the >> mosquito that is to blame. > > Everyone knows your opinion as well :-) > Yes. And telling him we don't want to hear it again, well.
From: Alan Baker on 21 Jul 2010 20:40
In article <i27g09$7uc$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > news:alangbaker-EB493D.09542821072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > In article <8aomqqFmbtU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > >> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > >> news:alangbaker-2127AD.09084021072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > >> > > >> > You're just saying that to be contrary. > >> > > >> LOL as you would say annoying one. > > > > Your grammar is as poor as your thinking. > > > > Ken has stated his opinion. > > > > Everyone knows Ken's opinion. > > > > Nearly everyone has told Ken they know his opinion and that they don't > > want to hear it again. > > > > So when Ken posts, he creates the annoyance. Replying to that is no > > different than slapping a mosquito that has bitten one. It is the > > mosquito that is to blame. > > Everyone knows your opinion as well :-) Yup. But I don't object to the flak I get. Ken wants the right to rant without getting any flak. That's just one of his hypocrisies. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg> |