From: dsc-ky on
On Jul 22, 7:05 am, Moderate <nos...(a)nomail.com> wrote:
> Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote:
> > In article <i27g09$7u...(a)speranza.aioe.org>,
> >  "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote:
>
> >> "Alan Baker" <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote in message
> >>news:alangbaker-EB493D.09542821072010(a)news.shawcable.com...
> >>> In article <8aomqqFmb...(a)mid.individual.net>,
> >>> "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> >>>> "Alan Baker" <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote in message
> >>>>news:alangbaker-2127AD.09084021072010(a)news.shawcable.com...
>
> >>>>> You're just saying that to be contrary.
>
> >>>> LOL as you would say annoying one.
>
> >>> Your grammar is as poor as your thinking.
>
> >>> Ken has stated his opinion.
>
> >>> Everyone knows Ken's opinion.
>
> >>> Nearly everyone has told Ken they know his opinion and that they
> > > > don't
> >>> want to hear it again.
>
> >>> So when Ken posts, he creates the annoyance. Replying to that is no
> >>> different than slapping a mosquito that has bitten one. It is the
> >>> mosquito that is to blame.
>
> >> Everyone knows your opinion as well :-)
>
> > Yup. But I don't object to the flak I get.
>
> > Ken wants the right to rant without getting any flak. That's just one
> > of
> > his hypocrisies.
>
> But your argument is that Ken is bothering everyone else. What kind of
> circular logic is that?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

In Baker's case, It's more a policy of do as I say... not as I do...

From: Alan Baker on
In article
<d79c05e9-103f-4fce-a83c-2e0b580a90f4(a)e5g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>,
dsc-ky <Dudley.Cornman(a)eku.edu> wrote:

> On Jul 22, 7:05�am, Moderate <nos...(a)nomail.com> wrote:
> > Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote:
> > > In article <i27g09$7u...(a)speranza.aioe.org>,
> > > �"Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >> "Alan Baker" <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote in message
> > >>news:alangbaker-EB493D.09542821072010(a)news.shawcable.com...
> > >>> In article <8aomqqFmb...(a)mid.individual.net>,
> > >>> "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> >
> > >>>> "Alan Baker" <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote in message
> > >>>>news:alangbaker-2127AD.09084021072010(a)news.shawcable.com...
> >
> > >>>>> You're just saying that to be contrary.
> >
> > >>>> LOL as you would say annoying one.
> >
> > >>> Your grammar is as poor as your thinking.
> >
> > >>> Ken has stated his opinion.
> >
> > >>> Everyone knows Ken's opinion.
> >
> > >>> Nearly everyone has told Ken they know his opinion and that they
> > > > > don't
> > >>> want to hear it again.
> >
> > >>> So when Ken posts, he creates the annoyance. Replying to that is no
> > >>> different than slapping a mosquito that has bitten one. It is the
> > >>> mosquito that is to blame.
> >
> > >> Everyone knows your opinion as well :-)
> >
> > > Yup. But I don't object to the flak I get.
> >
> > > Ken wants the right to rant without getting any flak. That's just one
> > > of
> > > his hypocrisies.
> >
> > But your argument is that Ken is bothering everyone else. What kind of
> > circular logic is that?- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> In Baker's case, It's more a policy of do as I say... not as I do...

Nope.

It is precisely the reverse.

I have absolutely no objection to anyone doing as I do: speaking his
mind on any subject they want.

Just don't whine about it if other people choose to reply in kind.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
<http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Prev: Support Sharon Angle
Next: Hey democrats