Prev: Support Sharon Angle
Next: Hey democrats
From: dsc-ky on 22 Jul 2010 12:40 On Jul 22, 7:05 am, Moderate <nos...(a)nomail.com> wrote: > Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > > In article <i27g09$7u...(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > > >> "Alan Baker" <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote in message > >>news:alangbaker-EB493D.09542821072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > >>> In article <8aomqqFmb...(a)mid.individual.net>, > >>> "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > >>>> "Alan Baker" <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote in message > >>>>news:alangbaker-2127AD.09084021072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > >>>>> You're just saying that to be contrary. > > >>>> LOL as you would say annoying one. > > >>> Your grammar is as poor as your thinking. > > >>> Ken has stated his opinion. > > >>> Everyone knows Ken's opinion. > > >>> Nearly everyone has told Ken they know his opinion and that they > > > > don't > >>> want to hear it again. > > >>> So when Ken posts, he creates the annoyance. Replying to that is no > >>> different than slapping a mosquito that has bitten one. It is the > >>> mosquito that is to blame. > > >> Everyone knows your opinion as well :-) > > > Yup. But I don't object to the flak I get. > > > Ken wants the right to rant without getting any flak. That's just one > > of > > his hypocrisies. > > But your argument is that Ken is bothering everyone else. What kind of > circular logic is that?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - In Baker's case, It's more a policy of do as I say... not as I do...
From: Alan Baker on 22 Jul 2010 12:49
In article <d79c05e9-103f-4fce-a83c-2e0b580a90f4(a)e5g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>, dsc-ky <Dudley.Cornman(a)eku.edu> wrote: > On Jul 22, 7:05�am, Moderate <nos...(a)nomail.com> wrote: > > Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > > > In article <i27g09$7u...(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > > > �"Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > > > > >> "Alan Baker" <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote in message > > >>news:alangbaker-EB493D.09542821072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > >>> In article <8aomqqFmb...(a)mid.individual.net>, > > >>> "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > >>>> "Alan Baker" <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote in message > > >>>>news:alangbaker-2127AD.09084021072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > > > >>>>> You're just saying that to be contrary. > > > > >>>> LOL as you would say annoying one. > > > > >>> Your grammar is as poor as your thinking. > > > > >>> Ken has stated his opinion. > > > > >>> Everyone knows Ken's opinion. > > > > >>> Nearly everyone has told Ken they know his opinion and that they > > > > > don't > > >>> want to hear it again. > > > > >>> So when Ken posts, he creates the annoyance. Replying to that is no > > >>> different than slapping a mosquito that has bitten one. It is the > > >>> mosquito that is to blame. > > > > >> Everyone knows your opinion as well :-) > > > > > Yup. But I don't object to the flak I get. > > > > > Ken wants the right to rant without getting any flak. That's just one > > > of > > > his hypocrisies. > > > > But your argument is that Ken is bothering everyone else. What kind of > > circular logic is that?- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > In Baker's case, It's more a policy of do as I say... not as I do... Nope. It is precisely the reverse. I have absolutely no objection to anyone doing as I do: speaking his mind on any subject they want. Just don't whine about it if other people choose to reply in kind. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg> |