From: Moderate on
BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
> In article <4i4v36d0svg62onklf4dfku6380og0hbbj(a)4ax.com>,
> bknight(a)conramp.net says...
>>
>> On 15 Jul 2010 22:40:31 GMT, Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> "Bad language" is a class issue. The same words said in Latin are
>>>> OK. But Anglo-Saxon versions of the word are "low class".
>>>>
>>>> So using crude language is sort of like wearing shirts without
>>>> collars. We don't want that on our golf courses.
>>>>
>>>> Or do you have a better reason? Or no reason at all?
>>>
>>> To be honest I find your passive aggressive postings to be dull as
> > > toast
>>> and was hoping to end the discussion. I will end it now.
>>
>> First, you're seldom honest.
>>
>> Next, Howard would be the last person to be classified as passive
>> aggressive. I think that you just have heard the term and wanted to
>> apply it to someone without knowing what it means.
>>
>> Here's a snapshot of the definition of passive aggressive personality
>> from a depression guide site:
>>
>> "Passive aggressive personality disorder is a chronic condition in
>> which a person seems to acquiesce to the desires and needs of others,
>> but actually passively resists them and becomes increasingly hostile
>> and angry".
>>
>>
>> Now, tell us that Howard fits that.
>>
>> BK
>
> Is everything a disorder with you?

Knit didn't know what passive aggressive was. He looked it up and could
not understand it.
From: bknight on
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:07:16 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:

>In article <4i4v36d0svg62onklf4dfku6380og0hbbj(a)4ax.com>,
>bknight(a)conramp.net says...
>>
>> On 15 Jul 2010 22:40:31 GMT, Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> "Bad language" is a class issue. The same words said in Latin are
>> >> OK. But Anglo-Saxon versions of the word are "low class".
>> >>
>> >> So using crude language is sort of like wearing shirts without
>> >> collars. We don't want that on our golf courses.
>> >>
>> >> Or do you have a better reason? Or no reason at all?
>> >
>> >To be honest I find your passive aggressive postings to be dull as toast
>> >and was hoping to end the discussion. I will end it now.
>>
>> First, you're seldom honest.
>>
>> Next, Howard would be the last person to be classified as passive
>> aggressive. I think that you just have heard the term and wanted to
>> apply it to someone without knowing what it means.
>>
>> Here's a snapshot of the definition of passive aggressive personality
>> from a depression guide site:
>>
>> "Passive aggressive personality disorder is a chronic condition in
>> which a person seems to acquiesce to the desires and needs of others,
>> but actually passively resists them and becomes increasingly hostile
>> and angry".
>>
>>
>> Now, tell us that Howard fits that.
>>
>> BK
>
>Is everything a disorder with you?


IM-Moderate suggested that Howard had the disorder, I didn't. Just
explained what he didn't know.


If you had a brain you'd have seen that.

BK
From: R&B on
On 2010-07-15 19:02:11 -0400, bknight(a)conramp.net said:

> On 15 Jul 2010 22:40:31 GMT, Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.com> wrote:
>
>>> "Bad language" is a class issue. The same words said in Latin are
>>> OK. But Anglo-Saxon versions of the word are "low class".
>>>
>>> So using crude language is sort of like wearing shirts without
>>> collars. We don't want that on our golf courses.
>>>
>>> Or do you have a better reason? Or no reason at all?
>>
>> To be honest I find your passive aggressive postings to be dull as toast
>> and was hoping to end the discussion. I will end it now.
>
> First, you're seldom honest.
>
> Next, Howard would be the last person to be classified as passive
> aggressive. I think that you just have heard the term and wanted to
> apply it to someone without knowing what it means.
>
> Here's a snapshot of the definition of passive aggressive personality
> from a depression guide site:
>
> "Passive aggressive personality disorder is a chronic condition in
> which a person seems to acquiesce to the desires and needs of others,
> but actually passively resists them and becomes increasingly hostile
> and angry".
>
>
> Now, tell us that Howard fits that.
>
> BK

Riiiiight. Like he can actually read and comprehend.

You're wasting your time, Bobby.

Randy

From: R&B on
On 2010-07-15 19:24:43 -0400, bknight(a)conramp.net said:

> On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:07:16 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <4i4v36d0svg62onklf4dfku6380og0hbbj(a)4ax.com>,
>> bknight(a)conramp.net says...
>>>
>>> On 15 Jul 2010 22:40:31 GMT, Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> "Bad language" is a class issue. The same words said in Latin are
>>>>> OK. But Anglo-Saxon versions of the word are "low class".
>>>>>
>>>>> So using crude language is sort of like wearing shirts without
>>>>> collars. We don't want that on our golf courses.
>>>>>
>>>>> Or do you have a better reason? Or no reason at all?
>>>>
>>>> To be honest I find your passive aggressive postings to be dull as toast
>>>> and was hoping to end the discussion. I will end it now.
>>>
>>> First, you're seldom honest.
>>>
>>> Next, Howard would be the last person to be classified as passive
>>> aggressive. I think that you just have heard the term and wanted to
>>> apply it to someone without knowing what it means.
>>>
>>> Here's a snapshot of the definition of passive aggressive personality
>>> from a depression guide site:
>>>
>>> "Passive aggressive personality disorder is a chronic condition in
>>> which a person seems to acquiesce to the desires and needs of others,
>>> but actually passively resists them and becomes increasingly hostile
>>> and angry".
>>>
>>>
>>> Now, tell us that Howard fits that.
>>>
>>> BK
>>
>> Is everything a disorder with you?
>
>
> IM-Moderate suggested that Howard had the disorder, I didn't. Just
> explained what he didn't know.
>
>
> If you had a brain you'd have seen that.
>
> BK


That's a big "if."

Randy

From: bknight on
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 07:36:42 -0400, "R&B"
<none_of_your_business(a)all.com> wrote:

>On 2010-07-15 19:24:43 -0400, bknight(a)conramp.net said:
>
>> On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:07:16 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In article <4i4v36d0svg62onklf4dfku6380og0hbbj(a)4ax.com>,
>>> bknight(a)conramp.net says...
>>>>
>>>> On 15 Jul 2010 22:40:31 GMT, Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> "Bad language" is a class issue. The same words said in Latin are
>>>>>> OK. But Anglo-Saxon versions of the word are "low class".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So using crude language is sort of like wearing shirts without
>>>>>> collars. We don't want that on our golf courses.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or do you have a better reason? Or no reason at all?
>>>>>
>>>>> To be honest I find your passive aggressive postings to be dull as toast
>>>>> and was hoping to end the discussion. I will end it now.
>>>>
>>>> First, you're seldom honest.
>>>>
>>>> Next, Howard would be the last person to be classified as passive
>>>> aggressive. I think that you just have heard the term and wanted to
>>>> apply it to someone without knowing what it means.
>>>>
>>>> Here's a snapshot of the definition of passive aggressive personality
>>>> from a depression guide site:
>>>>
>>>> "Passive aggressive personality disorder is a chronic condition in
>>>> which a person seems to acquiesce to the desires and needs of others,
>>>> but actually passively resists them and becomes increasingly hostile
>>>> and angry".
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Now, tell us that Howard fits that.
>>>>
>>>> BK
>>>
>>> Is everything a disorder with you?
>>
>>
>> IM-Moderate suggested that Howard had the disorder, I didn't. Just
>> explained what he didn't know.
>>
>>
>> If you had a brain you'd have seen that.
>>
>> BK
>
>
>That's a big "if."
>
>Randy


LOL.
IM-moderate= Tweedledumb.
BAR= Tweedledumber.

BK
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Prev: Support Sharon Angle
Next: Hey democrats