Prev: Support Sharon Angle
Next: Hey democrats
From: Moderate on 15 Jul 2010 19:24 BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <4i4v36d0svg62onklf4dfku6380og0hbbj(a)4ax.com>, > bknight(a)conramp.net says... >> >> On 15 Jul 2010 22:40:31 GMT, Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.com> wrote: >> >>>> "Bad language" is a class issue. The same words said in Latin are >>>> OK. But Anglo-Saxon versions of the word are "low class". >>>> >>>> So using crude language is sort of like wearing shirts without >>>> collars. We don't want that on our golf courses. >>>> >>>> Or do you have a better reason? Or no reason at all? >>> >>> To be honest I find your passive aggressive postings to be dull as > > > toast >>> and was hoping to end the discussion. I will end it now. >> >> First, you're seldom honest. >> >> Next, Howard would be the last person to be classified as passive >> aggressive. I think that you just have heard the term and wanted to >> apply it to someone without knowing what it means. >> >> Here's a snapshot of the definition of passive aggressive personality >> from a depression guide site: >> >> "Passive aggressive personality disorder is a chronic condition in >> which a person seems to acquiesce to the desires and needs of others, >> but actually passively resists them and becomes increasingly hostile >> and angry". >> >> >> Now, tell us that Howard fits that. >> >> BK > > Is everything a disorder with you? Knit didn't know what passive aggressive was. He looked it up and could not understand it.
From: bknight on 15 Jul 2010 19:24 On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:07:16 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >In article <4i4v36d0svg62onklf4dfku6380og0hbbj(a)4ax.com>, >bknight(a)conramp.net says... >> >> On 15 Jul 2010 22:40:31 GMT, Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.com> wrote: >> >> >> "Bad language" is a class issue. The same words said in Latin are >> >> OK. But Anglo-Saxon versions of the word are "low class". >> >> >> >> So using crude language is sort of like wearing shirts without >> >> collars. We don't want that on our golf courses. >> >> >> >> Or do you have a better reason? Or no reason at all? >> > >> >To be honest I find your passive aggressive postings to be dull as toast >> >and was hoping to end the discussion. I will end it now. >> >> First, you're seldom honest. >> >> Next, Howard would be the last person to be classified as passive >> aggressive. I think that you just have heard the term and wanted to >> apply it to someone without knowing what it means. >> >> Here's a snapshot of the definition of passive aggressive personality >> from a depression guide site: >> >> "Passive aggressive personality disorder is a chronic condition in >> which a person seems to acquiesce to the desires and needs of others, >> but actually passively resists them and becomes increasingly hostile >> and angry". >> >> >> Now, tell us that Howard fits that. >> >> BK > >Is everything a disorder with you? IM-Moderate suggested that Howard had the disorder, I didn't. Just explained what he didn't know. If you had a brain you'd have seen that. BK
From: R&B on 16 Jul 2010 07:35 On 2010-07-15 19:02:11 -0400, bknight(a)conramp.net said: > On 15 Jul 2010 22:40:31 GMT, Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.com> wrote: > >>> "Bad language" is a class issue. The same words said in Latin are >>> OK. But Anglo-Saxon versions of the word are "low class". >>> >>> So using crude language is sort of like wearing shirts without >>> collars. We don't want that on our golf courses. >>> >>> Or do you have a better reason? Or no reason at all? >> >> To be honest I find your passive aggressive postings to be dull as toast >> and was hoping to end the discussion. I will end it now. > > First, you're seldom honest. > > Next, Howard would be the last person to be classified as passive > aggressive. I think that you just have heard the term and wanted to > apply it to someone without knowing what it means. > > Here's a snapshot of the definition of passive aggressive personality > from a depression guide site: > > "Passive aggressive personality disorder is a chronic condition in > which a person seems to acquiesce to the desires and needs of others, > but actually passively resists them and becomes increasingly hostile > and angry". > > > Now, tell us that Howard fits that. > > BK Riiiiight. Like he can actually read and comprehend. You're wasting your time, Bobby. Randy
From: R&B on 16 Jul 2010 07:36 On 2010-07-15 19:24:43 -0400, bknight(a)conramp.net said: > On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:07:16 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > >> In article <4i4v36d0svg62onklf4dfku6380og0hbbj(a)4ax.com>, >> bknight(a)conramp.net says... >>> >>> On 15 Jul 2010 22:40:31 GMT, Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.com> wrote: >>> >>>>> "Bad language" is a class issue. The same words said in Latin are >>>>> OK. But Anglo-Saxon versions of the word are "low class". >>>>> >>>>> So using crude language is sort of like wearing shirts without >>>>> collars. We don't want that on our golf courses. >>>>> >>>>> Or do you have a better reason? Or no reason at all? >>>> >>>> To be honest I find your passive aggressive postings to be dull as toast >>>> and was hoping to end the discussion. I will end it now. >>> >>> First, you're seldom honest. >>> >>> Next, Howard would be the last person to be classified as passive >>> aggressive. I think that you just have heard the term and wanted to >>> apply it to someone without knowing what it means. >>> >>> Here's a snapshot of the definition of passive aggressive personality >>> from a depression guide site: >>> >>> "Passive aggressive personality disorder is a chronic condition in >>> which a person seems to acquiesce to the desires and needs of others, >>> but actually passively resists them and becomes increasingly hostile >>> and angry". >>> >>> >>> Now, tell us that Howard fits that. >>> >>> BK >> >> Is everything a disorder with you? > > > IM-Moderate suggested that Howard had the disorder, I didn't. Just > explained what he didn't know. > > > If you had a brain you'd have seen that. > > BK That's a big "if." Randy
From: bknight on 16 Jul 2010 08:28
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 07:36:42 -0400, "R&B" <none_of_your_business(a)all.com> wrote: >On 2010-07-15 19:24:43 -0400, bknight(a)conramp.net said: > >> On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:07:16 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >> >>> In article <4i4v36d0svg62onklf4dfku6380og0hbbj(a)4ax.com>, >>> bknight(a)conramp.net says... >>>> >>>> On 15 Jul 2010 22:40:31 GMT, Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> "Bad language" is a class issue. The same words said in Latin are >>>>>> OK. But Anglo-Saxon versions of the word are "low class". >>>>>> >>>>>> So using crude language is sort of like wearing shirts without >>>>>> collars. We don't want that on our golf courses. >>>>>> >>>>>> Or do you have a better reason? Or no reason at all? >>>>> >>>>> To be honest I find your passive aggressive postings to be dull as toast >>>>> and was hoping to end the discussion. I will end it now. >>>> >>>> First, you're seldom honest. >>>> >>>> Next, Howard would be the last person to be classified as passive >>>> aggressive. I think that you just have heard the term and wanted to >>>> apply it to someone without knowing what it means. >>>> >>>> Here's a snapshot of the definition of passive aggressive personality >>>> from a depression guide site: >>>> >>>> "Passive aggressive personality disorder is a chronic condition in >>>> which a person seems to acquiesce to the desires and needs of others, >>>> but actually passively resists them and becomes increasingly hostile >>>> and angry". >>>> >>>> >>>> Now, tell us that Howard fits that. >>>> >>>> BK >>> >>> Is everything a disorder with you? >> >> >> IM-Moderate suggested that Howard had the disorder, I didn't. Just >> explained what he didn't know. >> >> >> If you had a brain you'd have seen that. >> >> BK > > >That's a big "if." > >Randy LOL. IM-moderate= Tweedledumb. BAR= Tweedledumber. BK |