Ken's not going to like this
in [Golf]
|
Prev: Support Sharon Angle
Next: Hey democrats
From: bknight on 17 Jul 2010 20:09 On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 17:01:11 -0700 (PDT), kenpitts <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On Jul 17, 6:49�pm, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: >> In article <3a0610b1-ff19-46fd-806c- >> 178d605e5...(a)z8g2000yqz.googlegroups.com>, ken.p...(a)gmail.com says... >> >> Give it a rest Ken.- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > >Go look at who started this thread with my name in it. Why should I >roll overand play dead for the likes of him or the lunatic Baker? > >Ken Because it does no good Ken. Ignore it and it'll go away. Bobby
From: Carbon on 17 Jul 2010 22:25 On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 19:50:09 -0500, bknight wrote: > On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 17:43:15 -0700 (PDT), kenpitts > <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Nobody agrees that Tiger's behavior on the course is bad? > > For Christ's sake Ken. Do you see anyone here agreeing with you? DROP > IT, or do you like being raked over and over??? Feeds right into his persecution complex. And also his seething resentment of Tiger's success.
From: R&B on 17 Jul 2010 23:25 On 2010-07-17 22:25:34 -0400, Carbon said: > On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 19:50:09 -0500, bknight wrote: >> On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 17:43:15 -0700 (PDT), kenpitts >> <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Nobody agrees that Tiger's behavior on the course is bad? >> >> For Christ's sake Ken. Do you see anyone here agreeing with you? DROP >> IT, or do you like being raked over and over??? > > Feeds right into his persecution complex. And also his seething resentment > of Tiger's success. Which pre-dates Tiger's success on TOUR. Let's remember how his rants began right after Tiger signed his first deal with Nike just before announcing that he was turning pro in '96. Ken has continually shifted his reasoning about why he hates Tiger. Like most racists, he's always got an excuse. But one need only go back and read his rants about the "ghetto blasters" that Tiger helped bring to the golf course (in the form of young black people newly interested in golf) to get a clear picture as to why Ken really hates Tiger. For the record, I've never actually seen or heard a ghetto blaster on a golf course. Have you? Randy
From: kenpitts on 18 Jul 2010 00:12 On Jul 17, 10:25 pm, "R&B" <none_of_your_busin...(a)all.com> wrote: > On 2010-07-17 22:25:34 -0400, Carbon said: > > > On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 19:50:09 -0500, bknight wrote: > >> On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 17:43:15 -0700 (PDT), kenpitts > >> <ken.p...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> Nobody agrees that Tiger's behavior on the course is bad? > > >> For Christ's sake Ken. Do you see anyone here agreeing with you? DROP > >> IT, or do you like being raked over and over??? > > > Feeds right into his persecution complex. And also his seething resentment > > of Tiger's success. > > Which pre-dates Tiger's success on TOUR. > > Let's remember how his rants began right after Tiger signed his first > deal with Nike just before announcing that he was turning pro in '96. > > Ken has continually shifted his reasoning about why he hates Tiger. > Like most racists, he's always got an excuse. But one need only go > back and read his rants about the "ghetto blasters" that Tiger helped > bring to the golf course (in the form of young black people newly > interested in golf) to get a clear picture as to why Ken really hates > Tiger. > > For the record, I've never actually seen or heard a ghetto blaster on a > golf course. Have you? > > Randy I don't hate Tiger. Period. I don't resent his success. I resent his behavior on the course. Ken
From: Carbon on 18 Jul 2010 00:30
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:15:41 -0700, kenpitts wrote: > On Jul 17, 10:23 pm, "R&B" <none_of_your_busin...(a)all.com> wrote: > >> He's lived his life as a fool. So he knows no other way of being. > > I have a succssful career. My wife and I own three homes. I have friends > and family who love me. Who's the fool? If you think having three homes gives your life meaning, then you are. |