From: Bobby Knight on 8 Nov 2006 11:38 On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 10:15:06 -0600, "MnMikew" <mnmiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >"JJK" <surpher(a)verizon.net> wrote in message <cip> >> >> In an official database, I found a Larry Whittaker, who lives close to >> where >> Larry claims he does, with a HC Index of ~ 18. Larry claims that fellow is >> not him. Whatever. >> >Ah, another internet stalker. You and Baker should get a room. > None of that information is private, it's public, and LLLLLarrry actually advertises it. No stalking. ___, \o | / \ . "Someone likes every shot"! bk
From: John van der Pflum on 8 Nov 2006 11:48 On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 10:38:11 -0600, Bobby Knight <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote: >On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 10:15:06 -0600, "MnMikew" <mnmiikkew(a)aol.com> >wrote: > >> >>"JJK" <surpher(a)verizon.net> wrote in message ><cip> >>> >>> In an official database, I found a Larry Whittaker, who lives close to >>> where >>> Larry claims he does, with a HC Index of ~ 18. Larry claims that fellow is >>> not him. Whatever. >>> >>Ah, another internet stalker. You and Baker should get a room. >> > >None of that information is private, it's public, and LLLLLarrry >actually advertises it. No stalking. > ___, > \o > | > / \ > . >"Someone likes every shot"! >bk Posting it, however, is reprehensible. -- jvdp http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
From: Bobby Knight on 8 Nov 2006 12:02 On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:48:48 -0500, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspammy(a)bite.org> wrote: >On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 10:38:11 -0600, Bobby Knight <bknight(a)conramp.net> >wrote: > >>On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 10:15:06 -0600, "MnMikew" <mnmiikkew(a)aol.com> >>wrote: >> >>> >>>"JJK" <surpher(a)verizon.net> wrote in message >><cip> >>>> >>>> In an official database, I found a Larry Whittaker, who lives close to >>>> where >>>> Larry claims he does, with a HC Index of ~ 18. Larry claims that fellow is >>>> not him. Whatever. >>>> >>>Ah, another internet stalker. You and Baker should get a room. >>> >> >>None of that information is private, it's public, and LLLLLarrry >>actually advertises it. No stalking. >>bk > >Posting it, however, is reprehensible. If he didn't want it to be public, he wouldn't advertise it. He posts it 24/7 on his web site. All Baker did was call attention to it. Now, if his phone number was unlisted, you'd be right. ___, \o | / \ . "Someone likes every shot"! bk
From: John van der Pflum on 8 Nov 2006 12:22 On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:02:17 -0600, Bobby Knight <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote: >On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:48:48 -0500, John van der Pflum ><nowhammymyspammy(a)bite.org> wrote: > >>On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 10:38:11 -0600, Bobby Knight <bknight(a)conramp.net> >>wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 10:15:06 -0600, "MnMikew" <mnmiikkew(a)aol.com> >>>wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>"JJK" <surpher(a)verizon.net> wrote in message >>><cip> >>>>> >>>>> In an official database, I found a Larry Whittaker, who lives close to >>>>> where >>>>> Larry claims he does, with a HC Index of ~ 18. Larry claims that fellow is >>>>> not him. Whatever. >>>>> >>>>Ah, another internet stalker. You and Baker should get a room. >>>> >>> >>>None of that information is private, it's public, and LLLLLarrry >>>actually advertises it. No stalking. > >>>bk >> >>Posting it, however, is reprehensible. > >If he didn't want it to be public, he wouldn't advertise it. He posts >it 24/7 on his web site. All Baker did was call attention to it. > >Now, if his phone number was unlisted, you'd be right. > ___, > \o > | > / \ > . >"Someone likes every shot"! >bk Bobby, I completely disagree. And since OT stuff drives me nuts, I propose we continue to discuss this via email. -- jvdp http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
From: Bobby Knight on 8 Nov 2006 12:27
On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 12:22:29 -0500, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspammy(a)bite.org> wrote: >>If he didn't want it to be public, he wouldn't advertise it. He posts >>it 24/7 on his web site. All Baker did was call attention to it. >> >>Now, if his phone number was unlisted, you'd be right. >>bk > >Bobby, > >I completely disagree. > >And since OT stuff drives me nuts, I propose we continue to discuss >this via email. I tried that. No response. ___, \o | / \ . "Someone likes every shot"! bk |