Larry: outed (was Re: OT: McCain joins SwiftBoaters
in [Golf]
|
From: Alan Baker on 8 Nov 2006 12:41 In article <v7o3l2dvjc1s2fbqjf5hg849prb8559qel(a)4ax.com>, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspammy(a)bite.org> wrote: > On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 06:18:56 GMT, Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> > wrote: > > > I don't care who it is. Posting someone's personal information -- no > matter how easily obtained online -- is lower than low. Umm, John, I didn't post any information here that Larry hasn't posted himself. <URL:http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.golf/msg/c1e1945ef0f00cf1> > > Just like school on Saturday -- no class. I'll take that apology, now. -- 'It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix.' "It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix' (Edwin on Mac OS X) '[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' -- 'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
From: Alan Baker on 8 Nov 2006 12:42 In article <4ree2eFqo0qrU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MnMikew" <mnmiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > "John van der Pflum" <nowhammymyspammy(a)bite.org> wrote in message > news:v7o3l2dvjc1s2fbqjf5hg849prb8559qel(a)4ax.com... > > On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 06:18:56 GMT, Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> > > wrote: > > > > > > I don't care who it is. Posting someone's personal information -- no > > matter how easily obtained online -- is lower than low. > > > Funny how he screams about Bush and privacy issues though. I do? I mean, I would, but where have I actually done so? Ooops. -- 'It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix.' "It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix' (Edwin on Mac OS X) '[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' -- 'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
From: Alan Baker on 8 Nov 2006 12:42 In article <4ree4bFql0j7U1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MnMikew" <mnmiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > "JJK" <surpher(a)verizon.net> wrote in message > news:dSl4h.1324$2X4.337(a)trnddc04... > > "larry" wrote: > >> > > Do some homework. I could buy and sell you with my pocket change. > > > > "bill-o" wrote: > >> > Yeah? If I bought you for what you're worth and sold you for what you > > think > >> > you're worth I'd be richer than Bill Gates! :-P > > > > "Alan Baker" wrote: > >> Larry finally made it worth my while (because it would be sufficiently > >> funny to embarrass him if my suspicions are true), so I did a little > >> digging. > >> > >> Larry's business: Del Mar Data? It's website gives its address as: > >> > >> "Del Mar Data > >> POB 1638 > >> 7671 La Brisa Road > >> Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067" > >> > >> Only, as far as I could determine, there is no 7671 La Brisa Road. The > >> numbers on La Brisa -- a purely high-rent residential street, only run > >> from 17000 to about 17600; making it impossible for it to have been a > >> typo either. > >> > >> So I poke around some more. > >> > >> The telephone number for Del Mar Data, is also listed as the home number > >> of one Larry Whitaker, whose address happens to be listed as: > >> > >> "PO Box 1638 > >> Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067-1638 > >> (858) 759-7411" > >> > >> Now, how many "buy and sell you" kind of people do you know whose > >> business and home numbers are the same? How many do you know who don't > >> have an unlisted number? > >> > >> Interestingly, there is an "Avenida Brisa" which is located right at the > >> Morgan Run Resort and Golf Club, but once again, the highest number that > >> Google Maps knows about is 4099. And besides, the houses on that street > >> aren't the kind a "buy and sell you" sort of guy would be living in. > >> > >> If I had to guess, I'd say that Larry lives in one of the 1500 - 2500 > >> sq. ft. houses to be found on the Avenida Brisa, but lists his business > >> address on La Brisa Road because those *are* the sorts of places a "buy > >> and sell you kind of guy might want to live, and with any luck, he can > >> convince anyone who checks into it that he's a "buy and sell you" kind > >> of guy. > >> > >> Want more proof? What guy who can "buy and sell you" has as the only > >> contact person listed for his business: his own name. > >> > >> My dad isn't really "buy and sell you rich"; at least, not unless > >> earning something around very low seven figures a year from a business > >> he owns 90% of makes you one, but if you look at > >> <http://www.factorforms.com/> you don't see his name anywhere. > >> > >> Anyway, it just kind of struck me, that's all. > > > > > > In an official database, I found a Larry Whittaker, who lives close to > > where > > Larry claims he does, with a HC Index of ~ 18. Larry claims that fellow is > > not him. Whatever. > > > Ah, another internet stalker. You and Baker should get a room. As I said to John, what I posted, Larry has posted himself... <URL:http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.golf/msg/c1e1945ef0f00cf1> -- 'It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix.' "It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix' (Edwin on Mac OS X) '[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' -- 'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
From: Alan Baker on 8 Nov 2006 12:43 In article <8h24l21stv41p8j2390jl9pq91i0f8p3k0(a)4ax.com>, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspammy(a)bite.org> wrote: > On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 10:38:11 -0600, Bobby Knight <bknight(a)conramp.net> > wrote: > > >On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 10:15:06 -0600, "MnMikew" <mnmiikkew(a)aol.com> > >wrote: > > > >> > >>"JJK" <surpher(a)verizon.net> wrote in message > ><cip> > >>> > >>> In an official database, I found a Larry Whittaker, who lives close to > >>> where > >>> Larry claims he does, with a HC Index of ~ 18. Larry claims that fellow is > >>> not him. Whatever. > >>> > >>Ah, another internet stalker. You and Baker should get a room. > >> > > > >None of that information is private, it's public, and LLLLLarrry > >actually advertises it. No stalking. > > ___, > > \o > > | > > / \ > > . > >"Someone likes every shot"! > >bk > > Posting it, however, is reprehensible. Larry's posted it. -- 'It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix.' "It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix' (Edwin on Mac OS X) '[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' -- 'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
From: Alan Baker on 8 Nov 2006 12:44
In article <cg44l2p4ns0jlh8ovonfbulkrueap62pda(a)4ax.com>, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspammy(a)bite.org> wrote: > On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:02:17 -0600, Bobby Knight <bknight(a)conramp.net> > wrote: > > >On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:48:48 -0500, John van der Pflum > ><nowhammymyspammy(a)bite.org> wrote: > > > >>On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 10:38:11 -0600, Bobby Knight <bknight(a)conramp.net> > >>wrote: > >> > >>>On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 10:15:06 -0600, "MnMikew" <mnmiikkew(a)aol.com> > >>>wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>>"JJK" <surpher(a)verizon.net> wrote in message > >>><cip> > >>>>> > >>>>> In an official database, I found a Larry Whittaker, who lives close to > >>>>> where > >>>>> Larry claims he does, with a HC Index of ~ 18. Larry claims that fellow > >>>>> is > >>>>> not him. Whatever. > >>>>> > >>>>Ah, another internet stalker. You and Baker should get a room. > >>>> > >>> > >>>None of that information is private, it's public, and LLLLLarrry > >>>actually advertises it. No stalking. > > > >>>bk > >> > >>Posting it, however, is reprehensible. > > > >If he didn't want it to be public, he wouldn't advertise it. He posts > >it 24/7 on his web site. All Baker did was call attention to it. > > > >Now, if his phone number was unlisted, you'd be right. > > ___, > > \o > > | > > / \ > > . > >"Someone likes every shot"! > >bk > > Bobby, > > I completely disagree. > > And since OT stuff drives me nuts, I propose we continue to discuss > this via email. Funny. I wasn't driving you nuts yesterday when you want to post on political topics... -- 'It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix.' "It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix' (Edwin on Mac OS X) '[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' -- 'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM) |