From: William Clark on
In article <MPG.2653b9f68d912acd989ed9(a)news.giganews.com>,
BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:

> In article <wclark2-552823.19492411052010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-
> state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says...
> > > > > No, I said we should tattoo those caught here as illegal aliens and
> > > > > then
> > > > > deport them. The scarlet letter has its uses.
> > > >
> > > > Why not just tattoo a number on their arms and then send them to
> > > > extermination camps? Oh, wait, someone else tried that, didn't they?
> > >
> > > Do you carry your green card with you at all times. It is US federal
> > > law.
> >
> > So you do think the "camps" are a good idea. What a real charmer.
>
> Become a citizen and then get the law changed.

When all else fails, use the "foreigners out" hysteria.

How pathetic.
From: dene on

"Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message
news:alangbaker-A465A9.01120012052010(a)news.shawcable.com...
> In article <84uuu2F6ghU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
> "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote:
>
> > "kenpitts" <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> >
news:0c522f75-0d64-48e8-bac9-92a7bb5e6399(a)a34g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> > On May 11, 12:47 pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote:
> > > On Tue, 11 May 2010 10:31:59 -0700, "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com>
> >
> > > >My question to John remains. He seems to imply that an illegal should
> > have
> > > >a chance to prove himself. I think not.
> > >
> > > Of course he should. That's what the American justice system is built
> > > on. Otherwise we have a police state....which is just about what
> > > BAR's solution is.
> > >
> > > BK
> >
> > The rights of which you speak are for citizens. Not for illegals
> > charging across our border or terrorists in Gitmo.
> >
> > Ken
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Bingo. My point exactly.
> >
> > -Greg
>
> "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
> equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
> Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
>
> --
> Alan Baker
> Vancouver, British Columbia
> <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>

Put the statement in context. They are referring to citizens, which at the
time was white males.

-Greg


From: Alan Baker on
In article <850l03Fa43U1(a)mid.individual.net>,
"dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote:

> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message
> news:alangbaker-A465A9.01120012052010(a)news.shawcable.com...
> > In article <84uuu2F6ghU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
> > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote:
> >
> > > "kenpitts" <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> > >
> news:0c522f75-0d64-48e8-bac9-92a7bb5e6399(a)a34g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> > > On May 11, 12:47 pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 11 May 2010 10:31:59 -0700, "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com>
> > >
> > > > >My question to John remains. He seems to imply that an illegal should
> > > have
> > > > >a chance to prove himself. I think not.
> > > >
> > > > Of course he should. That's what the American justice system is built
> > > > on. Otherwise we have a police state....which is just about what
> > > > BAR's solution is.
> > > >
> > > > BK
> > >
> > > The rights of which you speak are for citizens. Not for illegals
> > > charging across our border or terrorists in Gitmo.
> > >
> > > Ken
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Bingo. My point exactly.
> > >
> > > -Greg
> >
> > "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
> > equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
> > Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
> >
> > --
> > Alan Baker
> > Vancouver, British Columbia
> > <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
>
> Put the statement in context. They are referring to citizens, which at the
> time was white males.

No, they were not.

They were referring to everyone. The clue would be "endowed by their
Creator".

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
<http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: dene on

<bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
news:h68lu5l936kdfm35fe0fgtlht8ncgubspd(a)4ax.com...
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 20:20:41 -0700 (PDT), kenpitts
> <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On May 11, 12:47 pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote:
> >> On Tue, 11 May 2010 10:31:59 -0700, "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ><bkni...(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
> >> >news:m44ju5hbdrpf9b2o5revnestdf2k4kt3m0(a)4ax.com...
> >> >> On Tue, 11 May 2010 10:16:25 -0700, "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >> >"John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> >>
>news:971993e3-6952-4b02-90ad-f3a4ed741a87(a)b7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
> >> >> >On May 11, 7:33 am, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote:
> >> >> <clip>
> >> >> >You've changed your standard from crossing the border to robbing
and
> >> >> >killing after crossing the border. So your argument now is that
> >> >> >everyone who enters the country illegally should be presumed a
thief
> >> >> >and a murderer and shot before he gets the chance. Right?
> >>
> >> >> >--------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> >> >A chance to do what?
> >>
> >> >> >-Greg
> >>
> >> >> C'mon Greg. That's perfectly clear. I wouldn't dare ask you, or
> >> >> anyone else, for the answer to the illegal alien problem because its
> >> >> so complicated, , but I will ask you this:
> >>
> >> >> Do you think BAR's suggestion (now said four times here) that anyone
> >> >> crossing our borders illegally should be summarily killed?
> >>
> >> >> That only requires a simple yes or no.
> >>
> >> >> BK
> >>
> >> >------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> >I believe I answered the question earlier.
> >>
> >> Sorry, I didn't see that.> Bert is wrong about this but at least he has
the guts to offer a solution.
> >>
> >> Hell, dropping an H bomb on Mexico could be called a solution,to
> >> consider murder as a solution is more than a stretch.
> >>
> >> > I don't believe securing our borders is particularily complicated.
It's a matter of political will.
> >>
> >> Since neither party, when in power, has been able to do this there
> >> must be some complications. Money is the main culprit.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >My question to John remains. He seems to imply that an illegal should
have
> >> >a chance to prove himself. I think not.
> >>
> >> Of course he should. That's what the American justice system is built
> >> on. Otherwise we have a police state....which is just about what
> >> BAR's solution is.
> >>
> >> BK
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> - Hide quoted text -
> >>
> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >>
> >> - Show quoted text -
> >
> >The rights of which you speak are for citizens. Not for illegals
> >charging across our border or terrorists in Gitmo.
> >
> >Ken
>
> Wrong, and that seems to have become usual for you about this. America
> is not a police state and everyone that is arrested here is given a
> fair trial. That is a right that is afforded every human being in the
> U.S.
>
> BK

An illegal criminal has a right to a fair trial. If found innocent, then
deportation. All illegals have the right for swift but humane deportation.
I object to the idea that either situation should give them "the chance" for
citizenship.

-Greg


From: Alan Baker on
In article <850l64Fb2vU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
"dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote:

> > >> >> <clip>
> > >> >> >You've changed your standard from crossing the border to robbing
> and
> > >> >> >killing after crossing the border. So your argument now is that
> > >> >> >everyone who enters the country illegally should be presumed a
> thief
> > >> >> >and a murderer and shot before he gets the chance. Right?
> > >>
> > >> >> >--------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>
> > >> >> >A chance to do what?
> > >>
> > >> >> >-Greg
> > >>
> > >> >> C'mon Greg. That's perfectly clear. I wouldn't dare ask you, or
> > >> >> anyone else, for the answer to the illegal alien problem because its
> > >> >> so complicated, , but I will ask you this:
> > >>
> > >> >> Do you think BAR's suggestion (now said four times here) that anyone
> > >> >> crossing our borders illegally should be summarily killed?
> > >>
> > >> >> That only requires a simple yes or no.
> > >>
> > >> >> BK
> > >>
> > >> >------------------------------------------------------
> > >>
> > >> >I believe I answered the question earlier.
> > >>
> > >> Sorry, I didn't see that.> Bert is wrong about this but at least he has
> the guts to offer a solution.
> > >>
> > >> Hell, dropping an H bomb on Mexico could be called a solution,to
> > >> consider murder as a solution is more than a stretch.
> > >>
> > >> > I don't believe securing our borders is particularily complicated.
> It's a matter of political will.
> > >>
> > >> Since neither party, when in power, has been able to do this there
> > >> must be some complications. Money is the main culprit.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> >My question to John remains. He seems to imply that an illegal should
> have
> > >> >a chance to prove himself. I think not.
> > >>
> > >> Of course he should. That's what the American justice system is built
> > >> on. Otherwise we have a police state....which is just about what
> > >> BAR's solution is.
> > >>
> > >> BK
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> - Hide quoted text -
> > >>
> > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> > >>
> > >> - Show quoted text -
> > >
> > >The rights of which you speak are for citizens. Not for illegals
> > >charging across our border or terrorists in Gitmo.
> > >
> > >Ken
> >
> > Wrong, and that seems to have become usual for you about this. America
> > is not a police state and everyone that is arrested here is given a
> > fair trial. That is a right that is afforded every human being in the
> > U.S.
> >
> > BK
>
> An illegal criminal has a right to a fair trial. If found innocent, then
> deportation. All illegals have the right for swift but humane deportation.
> I object to the idea that either situation should give them "the chance" for
> citizenship.

Where did anyone suggest that, Greg?

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
<http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>