Prev: March of the Titans (brief video re: White Race, 1 min, 30sec)
Next: What the heck is Tiger doing?
From: Howard Brazee on 5 May 2010 19:08 On Wed, 5 May 2010 11:44:13 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >Remember the days when teenagers actually worked? My folks had an exchange student from Mexico when I was in college. I talked with her and she told me how much she envied my younger brothers. Why? Because they were allowed to work - and had money to spend the way they wanted to. She said that in Mexico, the poor kids had to work, the well-off kids weren't allowed to work. How many of us screwed up a high-school job or two before we learned how to work? Screw-ups that don't show up as gaps on our resumes? -- "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department." - James Madison
From: Howard Brazee on 5 May 2010 19:12 On Wed, 5 May 2010 10:39:27 -0700, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: >> Reminds me of what Republicans did when they had a chance. > >Agree. The Bush admin. failed us in this regard. However, AZ. has taken >steps and the Left's response is to cry racism while producing no solutions >of their own. They had a plan that could have passed until their right wing yelled "amnesty" over and over again. The Democrats now have a tougher plan, but the Republicans are united against it - as they are united against anything they don't want the Democrats to get credit for. -- "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department." - James Madison
From: Carbon on 5 May 2010 19:40 On Wed, 05 May 2010 17:00:47 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > I think it's reprehensible for the Prez of Mexico to call Arizona's > law reprehensible. :-) Why?
From: Carbon on 5 May 2010 19:52 On Wed, 05 May 2010 18:30:21 -0400, BAR wrote: > In article <4be16b3f$0$4972$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... >> On Tue, 04 May 2010 20:42:31 -0700, kenpitts wrote: >> >>> Send them all back where they came from. It cheapens the >>> accomplishments of those who immigrated legally. >> >> How many American citizens do you know who would be willing to work >> 12 hour days bent over picking strawberries for less than minimum >> wage, with no benefits? > > The value of strawberries would go up. That is what we call market > forces. Ok, great! You're getting it. Now just to widen the scope a bit, we can include the food industry in general. Housing, manufacturing... Aw hell, let's just quadruple the cost of everything. The high standard of living that we enjoy is due in part to the availability of a large pool of cheap labor. It isn't economically practical to kick them all out. Your party will see to it that it never happens anyway. You do know this, right?
From: Jack Hollis on 5 May 2010 20:17
On Wed, 5 May 2010 09:21:53 -0700, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: >The liberal solution is not "nothing." It's to have comprehensive, >nationwide immigration reform. > >---------------------------------------------------------------- > >And the details are???? Here's my comprehensive immigration reform package. 1. Completely seal off the border and provide enough border control agents to stop almost all illegal aliens from entering the country. 2. Make it impossible for anyone who entered the nation illegally to ever become a US citizen. 3. Children born to illegal aliens in the US are not US citizens. 4. Immediate deportation of anyone caught in the US illegally. 5. No taxpayer funded benefits of any kind for illegal aliens or their children. 6. Heavy fines and jail terms for any company employing illegal aliens. 7. Begin a guest worker program to provide a legal alien workforce. That's pretty comprehensive. |