Prev: March of the Titans (brief video re: White Race, 1 min, 30sec)
Next: What the heck is Tiger doing?
From: BAR on 13 May 2010 17:59
In article <sfjmu5h5ebhlmmtja8mpno8a503sr375gt(a)4ax.com>,
> On Wed, 12 May 2010 16:33:27 -0700, Loudon Briggs <larebe(a)bbz.net>
> >If the person is charged with illegal entry only, they are NOT sent to
> >trial... they are turned over to U.S. Customs and get a "hearing,"
> >which is totally different from a trial. The normal result is
> What if the person is innocent?
Any non-citizen of the US who is here legally is required to have proof
of their authority to be in the US on their person at all times. This is
a federal law and a condition of their entry into the US.
Therefore, there can be no innocence.
From: BAR on 13 May 2010 18:01
In article <08aa20a5-5d71-4a75-b127-d34cdbb5e645
@a34g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says...
> On May 12, 5:55�pm, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 May 2010 10:24:29 -0500, MNMikeW wrote:
> > > "Carbon" <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
> > >news:4be9f0e7$0$19807$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
> > >> There is NO WAY that all these undocumented workers are doing enough
> > >> damage to the country to justify the cost of hunting them down and
> > >> getting rid of them.
> > > Tell that to Arizona.
> > They're certainly going to spend a lot of money with their new pogrom.
> They sure are. What are they going to do with the people they arrest
> under the new law? Drive them to the ICE Field Office in Phoenix and
> dump them there? Arizona is a huge state. Or will they call the ICE
> office and demand that they come and get them, then hold them for a
> week or more until someone from ICE can take an entire day out of his
> schedule to go pick them up? The AZ law doesn't give local
> jurisdictions authority to deport illegal aliens - only to arrest
The law is having its intended effect.
From: BAR on 13 May 2010 18:03
In article <363c5786-7a94-41bc-9a6e-
43633cdfd6bb(a)i10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says...
> > > > > You're a cretin and a fool.
> > > > At leat I am willing to do something about problems.
> > > Really? What are you willing to do? Go down to the border and kill a
> > > few yourself? I bet you'd enjoy that.
> > I am willing to start talking about the problem and offering ideas and
> > solutions. Something your are ill equiped to do.
> The "ideas and solutions" you've offered are disgusting and
> reprehensible. I would no sooner try to have an intelligent debate
> with you than with Idi Amin.
Your solution to grant amnesty is disgusting and reprehensible. It
didn't work last time and won't work this time.
From: BAR on 13 May 2010 18:03
In article <3b97b232-6f8e-4426-9fc2-599fa76f6665
@k42g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says...
> On May 12, 6:26�pm, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote:
> > In article <4beb2457$0$4865$9a6e1...(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>,
> > nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says...
> > > On Wed, 12 May 2010 08:27:16 -0400, BAR wrote:
> > > > In article <6hsju5ps13t3chal0m69rq4ad9lvt1h...(a)4ax.com>,
> > > > bkni...(a)conramp.net says...
> > > >> You're a cretin and a fool.
> > > > At least I am willing to do something about problems.
> > > If your solution is shooting people in the face, then perhaps everyone
> > > would be better off if you weren't.
> > You have to start the discussion somewhere. I chose to start it at an
> > extreme.
> Trying to decouple ourselves from our own despicable remarks, are we?
> You didn't really mean that people should be killed for crossing the
> border, you were just trying to start a discussion, right?
> Good luck with that, pal. You didn't start this discussion. Someone
> else did.
Propose a solution.
From: BAR on 13 May 2010 18:04
In article <7439f879-6d25-4cee-bebe-7e69d1821cc6
@k29g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says...
> > > And people who smoke pot are "bad people who need to be isolated from
> > > society", are they?
> > Pot smokers are not sitting in prison. �It's an ignored crime unless the
> > doper is dealing.
> > -Greg
> Twice in the 70s, cops saw me smoking dope. They didn't care.
Are you still smoking dope on a daily basis?