Prev: March of the Titans (brief video re: White Race, 1 min, 30sec)
Next: What the heck is Tiger doing?
From: BAR on 13 May 2010 17:59 In article <sfjmu5h5ebhlmmtja8mpno8a503sr375gt(a)4ax.com>, howard(a)brazee.net says... > > On Wed, 12 May 2010 16:33:27 -0700, Loudon Briggs <larebe(a)bbz.net> > wrote: > > >If the person is charged with illegal entry only, they are NOT sent to > >trial... they are turned over to U.S. Customs and get a "hearing," > >which is totally different from a trial. The normal result is > >deportation. > > What if the person is innocent? Any non-citizen of the US who is here legally is required to have proof of their authority to be in the US on their person at all times. This is a federal law and a condition of their entry into the US. Therefore, there can be no innocence.
From: BAR on 13 May 2010 18:01 In article <08aa20a5-5d71-4a75-b127-d34cdbb5e645 @a34g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says... > > On May 12, 5:55�pm, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 12 May 2010 10:24:29 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > > > "Carbon" <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > > >news:4be9f0e7$0$19807$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > > > > >> There is NO WAY that all these undocumented workers are doing enough > > >> damage to the country to justify the cost of hunting them down and > > >> getting rid of them. > > > > > Tell that to Arizona. > > > > They're certainly going to spend a lot of money with their new pogrom. > > They sure are. What are they going to do with the people they arrest > under the new law? Drive them to the ICE Field Office in Phoenix and > dump them there? Arizona is a huge state. Or will they call the ICE > office and demand that they come and get them, then hold them for a > week or more until someone from ICE can take an entire day out of his > schedule to go pick them up? The AZ law doesn't give local > jurisdictions authority to deport illegal aliens - only to arrest > them. The law is having its intended effect.
From: BAR on 13 May 2010 18:03 In article <363c5786-7a94-41bc-9a6e- 43633cdfd6bb(a)i10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says... > > > > > You're a cretin and a fool. > > > > > > At leat I am willing to do something about problems. > > > > > Really? What are you willing to do? Go down to the border and kill a > > > few yourself? I bet you'd enjoy that. > > > > I am willing to start talking about the problem and offering ideas and > > solutions. Something your are ill equiped to do. > > The "ideas and solutions" you've offered are disgusting and > reprehensible. I would no sooner try to have an intelligent debate > with you than with Idi Amin. > Your solution to grant amnesty is disgusting and reprehensible. It didn't work last time and won't work this time.
From: BAR on 13 May 2010 18:03 In article <3b97b232-6f8e-4426-9fc2-599fa76f6665 @k42g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says... > > On May 12, 6:26�pm, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > > In article <4beb2457$0$4865$9a6e1...(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > > nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 12 May 2010 08:27:16 -0400, BAR wrote: > > > > In article <6hsju5ps13t3chal0m69rq4ad9lvt1h...(a)4ax.com>, > > > > bkni...(a)conramp.net says... > > > > > >> You're a cretin and a fool. > > > > > > At least I am willing to do something about problems. > > > > > If your solution is shooting people in the face, then perhaps everyone > > > would be better off if you weren't. > > > > You have to start the discussion somewhere. I chose to start it at an > > extreme. > > Trying to decouple ourselves from our own despicable remarks, are we? > You didn't really mean that people should be killed for crossing the > border, you were just trying to start a discussion, right? > > Good luck with that, pal. You didn't start this discussion. Someone > else did. Propose a solution.
From: BAR on 13 May 2010 18:04
In article <7439f879-6d25-4cee-bebe-7e69d1821cc6 @k29g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says... > > > > > And people who smoke pot are "bad people who need to be isolated from > > > society", are they? > > > > Pot smokers are not sitting in prison. �It's an ignored crime unless the > > doper is dealing. > > > > -Greg > > Twice in the 70s, cops saw me smoking dope. They didn't care. > Are you still smoking dope on a daily basis? |