Liberal solution to illegal immigration
in [Golf]
|
Prev: March of the Titans (brief video re: White Race, 1 min, 30sec)
Next: What the heck is Tiger doing?
From: dene on 6 May 2010 02:22 "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message news:4be2143c$0$12286$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > On Wed, 05 May 2010 20:33:35 -0400, BAR wrote: > > In article <4be204cc$0$4988$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > > nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > > > >> The high standard of living that we enjoy is due in part to the > >> availability of a large pool of cheap labor. It isn't economically > >> practical to kick them all out. Your party will see to it that it > >> never happens anyway. You do know this, right? > > > > You do realize that you are making an argument for keeping illegal > > immagration for the sole purpose of keeping prices low to ensure your > > current standard of living. That is extremely selfish of you. > > I advocated nothing. I described policies implicitly supported by your > your own party. I personally think the whole situation is ridiculous. > You true believers are being taken advantage of. The Republicans, like > the Democrats, are sponsored by big agriculture and by many other large > industries who are depended on this practically unlimited pool of cheap > labor. They are absolutely not going to allow the source of their > profits to be kicked out. So what is your solution to dealing with these illegal, "smelly" people? -Greg
From: Alan Baker on 6 May 2010 02:39 In article <84f4qvFkd6U1(a)mid.individual.net>, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > news:alangbaker-A6025E.18163005052010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > In article <4be2018f$0$5023$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > > > > > How is it that you call Larry a troll but never say the same thing > > > > about Baker. I hope it isn't idealogy. > > > > > > Alan isn't a troll. He's more of a nitpicker. If someone makes a claim > > > that is in some way debatable, unsubstantiated, irrational, etc., Alan > > > will probably be asking questions about it. I don't see how picking > > > apart something someone else says is trolling. > > He asks questions for the purpose of picking a fight. He doesn't seek > information nor does he say anything substantial with a counter-argument. > It's a form of trolling. LOL > > > > But Larry here is advocating raping kids. I don't know about you, but to > > > me that crosses the line. > > > > Standard operating procedure for a narcissist who only sees that people > > are talking about him and not what they're saying. > > > > > > > > Also I'm a liberal and Alan is a libertarian, at least as far as I can > > > tell. > > I doubt if he sincerely believes anything, Carbs. LOL -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Alan Baker on 6 May 2010 02:40 In article <84f553Fm3qU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > news:alangbaker-2DD8BA.21542905052010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > In article <t0e3u59l82g1f7i53jt4jsofo7f7b81mno(a)4ax.com>, > > bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: > > > > I am. > > > > What business has the state in telling you what you do to yourself? > > > > Because few men are islands. Getting stoned everyday has a direct effect on > other people. Duh! Such as? > > Go back to nitpicking and leave sincere discussion to grownups. LOL -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: BAR on 6 May 2010 07:33 In article <4be2143c$0$12286$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > > On Wed, 05 May 2010 20:33:35 -0400, BAR wrote: > > In article <4be204cc$0$4988$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > > nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > > > >> The high standard of living that we enjoy is due in part to the > >> availability of a large pool of cheap labor. It isn't economically > >> practical to kick them all out. Your party will see to it that it > >> never happens anyway. You do know this, right? > > > > You do realize that you are making an argument for keeping illegal > > immagration for the sole purpose of keeping prices low to ensure your > > current standard of living. That is extremely selfish of you. > > I advocated nothing. I described policies implicitly supported by your > your own party. I personally think the whole situation is ridiculous. > You true believers are being taken advantage of. The Republicans, like > the Democrats, are sponsored by big agriculture and by many other large > industries who are depended on this practically unlimited pool of cheap > labor. They are absolutely not going to allow the source of their > profits to be kicked out. The Democrats are supported by big banking, big oil (BP) and Goldman Sachs.
From: Carbon on 6 May 2010 07:40
On Wed, 05 May 2010 23:22:09 -0700, dene wrote: > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > news:4be2143c$0$12286$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >> On Wed, 05 May 2010 20:33:35 -0400, BAR wrote: >>> In article <4be204cc$0$4988$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, >>> nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... >>> >>>> The high standard of living that we enjoy is due in part to the >>>> availability of a large pool of cheap labor. It isn't economically >>>> practical to kick them all out. Your party will see to it that it >>>> never happens anyway. You do know this, right? >>> >>> You do realize that you are making an argument for keeping illegal >>> immagration for the sole purpose of keeping prices low to ensure >>> your current standard of living. That is extremely selfish of you. >> >> I advocated nothing. I described policies implicitly supported by >> your your own party. I personally think the whole situation is >> ridiculous. You true believers are being taken advantage of. The >> Republicans, like the Democrats, are sponsored by big agriculture and >> by many other large industries who are depended on this practically >> unlimited pool of cheap labor. They are absolutely not going to allow >> the source of their profits to be kicked out. > > So what is your solution to dealing with these illegal, "smelly" > people? I originally made the smelly crack to appeal to the less tolerant here. I don't really believe it. Some of my best friends are smelly... Anyway, I think the only thing that will stop illegal immigration is for the economy to get so bad here that it's not worth the trip to get here. Otherwise, it's simple market forces. Labor goes where the pay is greatest. I find it highly amusing that the same people who foam at the mouth over even the thought regulating the healthcare or oil industries (what could possibly go wrong?) want to round everyone up who even so much as looks Mexican. Do we only believe in free market capitalism when it's convenient, or what? |