From: bknight on
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 11:41:05 -0400, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com>
wrote:

>On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 06:28:52 -0700 (PDT), "John B."
><johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>As for the regulation itself, which Bobby posted and I read, I think
>>Jack is probably right. But I doubt the IRS cares about payments to
>>someone who works one half-day per week.
>
>A half day a week over a year can add up to enough money that the IRS
>is interested. Of course, you're probably not the only person she
>works for.

If you pay a housekeeper $1700 a year, then you must report it.

BK
From: Alan Baker on
In article <l7aa061i5g4i3fhc63te8u75f5ah53ht8l(a)4ax.com>,
Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 31 May 2010 19:11:33 -0700, Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net>
> wrote:
>
> >> It doesn't really matter. If you're paying an individual or a
> >> contractor the payments must be reported to the IRS. It's a lot less
> >> complicated hiring someone who qualifies as an independent contractor
> >> but the IRS still wants to know about it.
> >
> >You're quite wrong.
> >
> >You should read the appropriate IRS pamphlet on the subject: I have.
>
> I'm sorry but you're wrong. I worked as an independent contractor for
> over 25 years and know the law. See IRS form 1099.
>
> Perhaps you could enlighten us with this pamphlet.

<http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p926.pdf>

"Introduction

The information in this publication applies to you only if you
have a household employee. If you have a household
employee in 2010, you may need to pay state and federal household
employment taxes for 2010. You generally must add your
federal employment taxes to the income tax that you report on your 2010
federal income tax return.

....

Workers who are not your employees. If only the
worker can control how the work is done, the worker is not
your employee but is self-employed. A self-employed
worker usually provides his or her own tools and offers
We respond to many letters by telephone. Therefore, it services to the
general public in an independent business."

As you can see, having an independent contractor do work for you does
not trigger all you say.

Do you have to report to the IRS anything at all when you have a plumber
work on you home? No.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
<http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: John B. on
On Jun 1, 11:50 am, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote:
> In article
> <e6533f7e-1747-4842-b207-be8dc8aca...(a)u7g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>,
>  "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 31, 10:11 pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote:
> > > In article <n1m806l2pbng2aq0nd75k3or5grun1p...(a)4ax.com>,
> > >  Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Sun, 30 May 2010 19:12:55 -0700, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net>
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > >You don't even know if his housecleaner is an employee or an independent
> > > > >contractor, yet you confidently declare as if you did.
>
> > > > It doesn't really matter.  If you're paying an individual or a
> > > > contractor the payments must be reported to the IRS.  It's a lot less
> > > > complicated hiring someone who qualifies as an independent contractor
> > > > but the IRS still wants to know about it.
>
> > > You're quite wrong.
>
> > > You should read the appropriate IRS pamphlet on the subject: I have.
>
> > > --
> > > Alan Baker
> > > Vancouver, British Columbia
> > > <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
>
> > As for the regulation itself, which Bobby posted and I read, I think
> > Jack is probably right. But I doubt the IRS cares about payments to
> > someone who works one half-day per week.
>
> As I said, I don't know about your specific situation, but all those who
> posted that she must be an employee in the eyes of the IRS are simply
> wrong.
>
They are not wrong. Read this:
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p926.pdf


From: Alan Baker on
In article
<f35a9894-fd03-49f4-93f9-820ca156ad87(a)q23g2000vba.googlegroups.com>,
"John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jun 1, 11:50�am, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote:
> > In article
> > <e6533f7e-1747-4842-b207-be8dc8aca...(a)u7g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>,
> > �"John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On May 31, 10:11�pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote:
> > > > In article <n1m806l2pbng2aq0nd75k3or5grun1p...(a)4ax.com>,
> > > > �Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > On Sun, 30 May 2010 19:12:55 -0700, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net>
> > > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > >You don't even know if his housecleaner is an employee or an
> > > > > >independent
> > > > > >contractor, yet you confidently declare as if you did.
> >
> > > > > It doesn't really matter. �If you're paying an individual or a
> > > > > contractor the payments must be reported to the IRS. �It's a lot less
> > > > > complicated hiring someone who qualifies as an independent contractor
> > > > > but the IRS still wants to know about it.
> >
> > > > You're quite wrong.
> >
> > > > You should read the appropriate IRS pamphlet on the subject: I have.
> >
> > > > --
> > > > Alan Baker
> > > > Vancouver, British Columbia
> > > > <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
> >
> > > As for the regulation itself, which Bobby posted and I read, I think
> > > Jack is probably right. But I doubt the IRS cares about payments to
> > > someone who works one half-day per week.
> >
> > As I said, I don't know about your specific situation, but all those who
> > posted that she must be an employee in the eyes of the IRS are simply
> > wrong.
> >
> They are not wrong. Read this:
> http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p926.pdf

I did.

All that says is that you are now telling us your specific situation
matches up with employee and not independent contractor...

....but they couldn't have known that until now.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
<http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Alan Baker on
In article <abba06pq631tj1jm8f42rff7f24nbf6qq4(a)4ax.com>,
bknight(a)conramp.net wrote:

> On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 11:41:05 -0400, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com>
> wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 06:28:52 -0700 (PDT), "John B."
> ><johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>As for the regulation itself, which Bobby posted and I read, I think
> >>Jack is probably right. But I doubt the IRS cares about payments to
> >>someone who works one half-day per week.
> >
> >A half day a week over a year can add up to enough money that the IRS
> >is interested. Of course, you're probably not the only person she
> >works for.
>
> If you pay a housekeeper $1700 a year, then you must report it.
>
> BK

Not if he/she is an independent contractor.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
<http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>