From: dene on

<bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
news:0ao6u59bq96nmsqkrlu50o9git6go2q0cv(a)4ax.com...

> >Soon, Bobby Knight will be receiving a package for Bubba. He'll never
let
> >Bubba dump on my yard again.
> >
> >Laws and consequences.
> >
> >-Greg
> >
> Damn. He got out again?
>
> BK

Woof.

-Greg


From: John B. on
On May 6, 8:48 pm, kenpitts <ken.p...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 6, 8:03 am, "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 5, 11:52 pm, kenpitts <ken.p...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On May 5, 11:36 am, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote:
>
> > > > On Wed, 5 May 2010 11:21:30 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com>
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > >===========================================
> > > > >The only people willing to do farm labor for less than min wage are
> > > > >illegal's. With unemployment around 10% I would imagine there are more than
> > > > >a few what would do it.
>
> > > > Then why aren't they?   The simple fact of cheap Mexican labor is that
> > > > they're willing to work hard for little money.....Americans aren't.
>
> > > > The U.S. is to blame for the Mexican dope trade too.  Guess who's
> > > > buying it?
>
> > > > So if we could find American workers who wouldn't mind hard work, and
> > > > lay off heroin products, it would go a long way in fixing both
> > > > problems.  :-)
>
> > > > BK
>
> > > I happen to kinow there are many construction jobs where the
> > > superintendant will not hire anyone but an illegal Mexican. Two
> > > reasons, skilled craftsmen and lower wages. I know this from a retired
> > > superintendant.
>
> > > They have renovated very near my area at work. I can hear what goes on
> > > every day for weeks now. Every single worker speaks exclusively
> > > Spanish. And the Mexican foreman was the only one I heard that could
> > > speak English at any level with the contractor and the facilities
> > > manager at the plant. We're talking defense plant here. Bottom line at
> > > least 50% of these guys are here illegally. They should be on the next
> > > bus to Nuevo Laredo. If they won't even certify this job, will they
> > > certify any job?
>
> > > Send the illegals back. We have done it before. The labor situation
> > > will right itself as the free market dictates. I guarantee there will
> > > be people (perm residents and citizens) willing to take those
> > > slaughterhouse jobs.
>
> > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Wetback
>
> > > Before you take off on me about racism, I work for a Hispanic manager
> > > and we get along great. Guess what, he agrees with me 100% because his
> > > family all came here legally. So did my wife and all my in-laws.
>
> > > Ken- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > Try to imagine what it would take and what it would be like to round
> > up 12m people and deport them. It would be extremely expensive and
> > difficult. Police kicking down doors every day and night all across
> > the country. TV images of poor Latinos and their children being
> > dragged, crying, from their mobile homes and forced onto buses. Long
> > lines of buses at the Mexican border. And what about the millions who
> > came from Guatemala and El Salvador? Do we fly them back to their
> > countries of origin? What if the Guatemalan and Salvadoran governments
> > won't let the planes land? There would be so many negative
> > consequences, you could write a book about them.
>
> > We can't afford to do this, either financially or politically. And
> > there simply aren't 12m Americans who are willing to do the dirty jobs
> > that the illegal aliens do.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Send them back We have to start somewhere. As it is we are doing
> nothing and they are a huge burden. I say we cannot afford not to do
> it.
>
> The free market will take care of the jobs that are vacated. Maybe the
> conditions or the technology will have to improve. Your solution is no
> solution.
>
> Ken

They are a huge burden in communities along the border. Their presence
here has no appreciable effect on the national economy.

Finding them all, confirming their status and sending them all back
would cost hundreds of billions of dollars.
From: Jack Hollis on
On Wed, 05 May 2010 21:55:58 -0700, Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net>
wrote:

>In article <sv24u5dn8eh0ea9e9qgk58l3fnnsm00ika(a)4ax.com>,
> Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 05 May 2010 13:31:17 -0500, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote:
>>
>> >Marijuana only. You can't be serious about legalizing heroin,
>> >cocaine or meth.
>> >
>> >BK
>>
>> All drugs should be legal.
>>
>> Synthetic heroin, known as methadone , is distributed free to
>> "patients" on methadone maintenance programs.
>
>Wow, Jack: you continue your run of being wrong.
>
>Methadone is *not* synthetic heroin.


Sorry Alan, but methadone is classified as a "synthetic opioid." It
works on the opioid receptors and is cross tolerant with all other
opioids. It also has all the same effects, including being highly
addictive.

However, it is chemically different than opiods, if that's what you
mean.
From: kenpitts on
On May 6, 6:09 pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote:
> On Thu, 6 May 2010 18:44:47 -0400, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote:
> >I would use the US military to secure our borders. Anyone attempting to
> >cross at any point other than an official US border crossing will be
> >shot dead on sight.
>
> This kind of shallow thought is to be expected of you.  The death
> penalty, without legal recourse?
>
> You're pitiful.
>
> BK

That's about what the Mexicans do on their southern border.

Ken
From: Jack Hollis on
On Wed, 5 May 2010 23:20:14 -0700, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com>
wrote:

>"Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message
>news:alangbaker-2DD8BA.21542905052010(a)news.shawcable.com...
>> In article <t0e3u59l82g1f7i53jt4jsofo7f7b81mno(a)4ax.com>,
>> bknight(a)conramp.net wrote:
>>
>> I am.
>>
>> What business has the state in telling you what you do to yourself?
>>
>
>Because few men are islands. Getting stoned everyday has a direct effect on
>other people. Duh!

Lots of things that people do have direct effects on other people, but
that's no reason to put someone in jail for it. Should people be put
in jail for cheating on their spouse? What about people who neglect
their family because they watch too much TV or spend too much time
playing computer games? What about overeating to the point of
obesity? Doesn't that have direct effect on other people?