Liberal solution to illegal immigration
in [Golf]
|
Prev: March of the Titans (brief video re: White Race, 1 min, 30sec)
Next: What the heck is Tiger doing?
From: John B. on 6 May 2010 21:45 On May 6, 9:28 pm, kenpitts <ken.p...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On May 6, 6:09 pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > > > On Thu, 6 May 2010 18:44:47 -0400, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > > >I would use the US military to secure our borders. Anyone attempting to > > >cross at any point other than an official US border crossing will be > > >shot dead on sight. > > > This kind of shallow thought is to be expected of you. The death > > penalty, without legal recourse? > > > You're pitiful. > > > BK > > That's about what the Mexicans do on their southern border. > > Ken No it isn't, but what if it were? That would make it OK for us to do it, too?
From: Carbon on 6 May 2010 21:45 On Thu, 06 May 2010 18:15:09 -0700, dene wrote: > <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > news:lqi6u55nqa7kk6in6129j637l8enunpe10(a)4ax.com... >> On Thu, 6 May 2010 18:44:47 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >> >>> I would use the US military to secure our borders. Anyone attempting >>> to cross at any point other than an official US border crossing will >>> be shot dead on sight. >> >> This kind of shallow thought is to be expected of you. The death >> penalty, without legal recourse? >> >> You're pitiful. > > So you don't advocate shoot on sight orders for those who enter a > military base illegally or get too close to a warship? > > If you do, what's the distinction between shoot on sight and Bert's > scenario? They're not even remotely the same situation and you know it.
From: Carbon on 6 May 2010 21:48 On Thu, 06 May 2010 18:45:19 -0700, John B. wrote: > On May 6, 9:28 pm, kenpitts <ken.p...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On May 6, 6:09 pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: >>> On Thu, 6 May 2010 18:44:47 -0400, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I would use the US military to secure our borders. Anyone >>>> attempting to cross at any point other than an official US border >>>> crossing will be shot dead on sight. >>> >>> This kind of shallow thought is to be expected of you. The death >>> penalty, without legal recourse? >>> >>> You're pitiful. >> >> That's about what the Mexicans do on their southern border. > > No it isn't, but what if it were? That would make it OK for us to do > it, too? Turns out the righties here are big fans of moral relativism. Right and wrong, good and evil are apparently totally irrelevant. Who knew?
From: Carbon on 6 May 2010 21:50 On Thu, 06 May 2010 17:58:56 -0700, kenpitts wrote: > I had to show a certified copy of my birth certificate to work at the > helicopter ranch as a systems analyst. You might think that POTUS is > more important than little old me. Call me a birther, but why would > the president spend millions on hiding so many things from his past? Please tell me you're not serious.
From: Carbon on 6 May 2010 21:52
On Thu, 06 May 2010 18:33:37 -0700, kenpitts wrote: > On May 6, 8:21 pm, "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> They are a huge burden in communities along the border. Their >> presence here has no appreciable effect on the national economy. >> >> Finding them all, confirming their status and sending them all back >> would cost hundreds of billions of dollars. > > I would bet the ranch California's economic crisis would be far less > without all the illegal aliens. Really? How do you imagine that? |