From: Don Kirkman on
On Sat, 08 May 2010 20:59:27 -0400, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com>
wrote:

>On Fri, 7 May 2010 17:31:06 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:

>>In article <15e109f3-c8f4-4e85-b67e-00e442e6c3d9
>>@e1g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says...
>>> The Marielitos who came here in 1980 are the most successful immigrant
>>> group in the U.S. They have built a highly prosperous diaspora in

>Any group in the US with the following qualities will do very well.

>1. Strong family unit.
>2. Value education.
>3. Work hard.
>4. Entrepreneurial spirit

Yes, they will do well but not always immediately. The Japanese and
probably the original Chinese as well had precisely those values as
well as your #5--but the antipathy toward them and stereotypical
thinking kept the Euro Americans from recognizing that reality until
late in the war, when the qualities of both the Chinese and Japanese
were much more accepted. The Chinese, of course, were on our side in
WW II so they were a decade or two ahead of the Japanese.

>Immigrant groups need one more quality

>5. Willingness to sacrifice for their children.

>When I see what the Asians (especially the Koreans) have done in this
>country in the past 40 years I have to conclude that there is no
>excuse for failure.

Pretty much right, but the Koreans have built on over 100 years of
Chinese, Japanese, and Filipino accomplishments. Understandable,
especially since Korea was a colony of Japan until the surrender in
1945.
--
Don Kirkman
donsno2(a)charter.net
From: Carbon on
On Sun, 09 May 2010 01:07:56 -0400, BAR wrote:
> In article <e9313f6a-885e-44f8-b4cb-5362aeb48277
> @b7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says...
>
>> How is that reciprocal when Americans can own property in Mexico?
>
> Please provide proof that US nationals can be majority owners of real
> property in Mexico.

Please provide proof that rounding up undocumented workers by the
thousands and murdering them is a good idea.
From: BAR on
In article <4be6bd3c$0$21861$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>,
nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says...
>
> On Sun, 09 May 2010 01:07:56 -0400, BAR wrote:
> > In article <e9313f6a-885e-44f8-b4cb-5362aeb48277
> > @b7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says...
> >
> >> How is that reciprocal when Americans can own property in Mexico?
> >
> > Please provide proof that US nationals can be majority owners of real
> > property in Mexico.
>
> Please provide proof that rounding up undocumented workers by the
> thousands and murdering them is a good idea.

Nice try buddy. The legal term is illegal aliens.

I never said anything about rounding up illegal aliens and murdering
them. What I said is we round up illegal aliens and we ship them back to
their country of origin.

What we need to do is put the US military on our borders and shoot
anyone trying to enter the country illegally.
From: Carbon on
On Sun, 09 May 2010 09:58:26 -0400, BAR wrote:
> In article <4be6bd3c$0$21861$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>,
> nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says...
>> On Sun, 09 May 2010 01:07:56 -0400, BAR wrote:
>>> In article <e9313f6a-885e-44f8-b4cb-5362aeb48277
>>> @b7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says...
>>>
>>>> How is that reciprocal when Americans can own property in Mexico?
>>>
>>> Please provide proof that US nationals can be majority owners of
>>> real property in Mexico.
>>
>> Please provide proof that rounding up undocumented workers by the
>> thousands and murdering them is a good idea.
>
> Nice try buddy. The legal term is illegal aliens.
>
> I never said anything about rounding up illegal aliens and murdering
> them. What I said is we round up illegal aliens and we ship them back
> to their country of origin.
>
> What we need to do is put the US military on our borders and shoot
> anyone trying to enter the country illegally.

Please provide proof that putting the US military on the border and
shooting anyone trying to enter the country illegally is a good idea.
From: bknight on
On Sun, 9 May 2010 01:07:56 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:

>In article <e9313f6a-885e-44f8-b4cb-5362aeb48277
>@b7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says...
>>
>> On May 8, 7:01�pm, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote:
>> > In article <vunbu5h4vpn0f3edg9q2n03slsuhm87...(a)4ax.com>,
>> > how...(a)brazee.net says...
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > On Sat, 8 May 2010 08:56:27 -0400, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > >Mexicans nationals cannot own property in the US.
>> >
>> > > Why not?
>> >
>> > It is all part of the reciprocity argument. Non Mexicans are not allowed
>> > to be majority owners of property in Mexico. Just turn the tables on
>> > them when in our contry.
>>
>> How is that reciprocal when Americans can own property in Mexico?
>
>Please provide proof that US nationals can be majority owners of real
>property in Mexico.
>
><http://www.mexonline.com/propmex.htm>

CAN FOREIGNERS REALLY OWN PROPERTY IN MEXICO?
Yes, Americans and other foreigners may obtain direct ownership of
property in the interior of Mexico. However, under Mexican law,
foreigners cannot own property outright within the restricted zone.

Is that clear enough for you? Your statement of reciprocity obviously
makes a Mexican citizen's right to own property here legal.

BK