Liberal solution to illegal immigration
in [Golf]
|
Prev: March of the Titans (brief video re: White Race, 1 min, 30sec)
Next: What the heck is Tiger doing?
From: Carbon on 9 May 2010 18:11 On Sun, 09 May 2010 11:07:21 -0400, BAR wrote: > In article <4be6c2f0$0$21861$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... >> On Sun, 09 May 2010 09:58:26 -0400, BAR wrote: >>> In article <4be6bd3c$0$21861$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, >>> nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... >>>> On Sun, 09 May 2010 01:07:56 -0400, BAR wrote: >>>>> In article <e9313f6a-885e-44f8-b4cb-5362aeb48277 >>>>> @b7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says... >>>>> >>>>>> How is that reciprocal when Americans can own property in Mexico? >>>>> >>>>> Please provide proof that US nationals can be majority owners of >>>>> real property in Mexico. >>>> >>>> Please provide proof that rounding up undocumented workers by the >>>> thousands and murdering them is a good idea. >>> >>> Nice try buddy. The legal term is illegal aliens. >>> >>> I never said anything about rounding up illegal aliens and murdering >>> them. What I said is we round up illegal aliens and we ship them >>> back to their country of origin. >>> >>> What we need to do is put the US military on our borders and shoot >>> anyone trying to enter the country illegally. >> >> Please provide proof that putting the US military on the border and >> shooting anyone trying to enter the country illegally is a good idea. > > If your chances of making the crossing are 50/50 are you going to make > the attempt? http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/proof
From: John B. on 9 May 2010 18:11 On May 9, 9:58 am, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <4be6bd3c$0$21861$9a6e1...(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > > > > > On Sun, 09 May 2010 01:07:56 -0400, BAR wrote: > > > In article <e9313f6a-885e-44f8-b4cb-5362aeb48277 > > > @b7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>, johnb...(a)gmail.com says... > > > >> How is that reciprocal when Americans can own property in Mexico? > > > > Please provide proof that US nationals can be majority owners of real > > > property in Mexico. > > > Please provide proof that rounding up undocumented workers by the > > thousands and murdering them is a good idea. > > Nice try buddy. The legal term is illegal aliens. > > I never said anything about rounding up illegal aliens and murdering > them. What I said is we round up illegal aliens and we ship them back to > their country of origin. > > What we need to do is put the US military on our borders and shoot > anyone trying to enter the country illegally. You also said that illegal aliens caught here should be tattooed, like the Nazis did to Jews.
From: John B. on 9 May 2010 18:16 On May 8, 9:34 pm, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote: > On Fri, 07 May 2010 20:13:39 -0500, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > >>On Fri, 07 May 2010 12:01:06 -0500, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > > >>>It's insane to give such freedom when you are assured that it will, in > >>>fact, cause harm to others. Your opinion would be different if a > >>>loved one was killed by someone driving a car while high on cocaine. > >>>If not, you're certainly in the minority. > > >>>BK > > >>Just because cocaine is legal doesn't mean that driving under the > >>influence of cocaine would be legal. Alcohol is legal. > > >You aren't thinking very straight. Driving under the influence of > >either is illegal now. Why would that change? > > >BK > > You were inferring that my opinion on legalization would be different > if a loved one were killed by someone under the influence of cocaine. > But to me it's irrelevant because driving under the influence of all > drugs would still be illegal. Tens of thousands of people are killed > every year in the US by people driving under the influence of alcohol > and I don't think that alcohol should be illegal. Why should any > other drugs be different? Should narcotics be sold in retail stores, like alcohol, or do you favor creating a government bureaucracy to dispense them?
From: John B. on 9 May 2010 18:19 On May 9, 11:53 am, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote: > On Fri, 7 May 2010 21:23:18 -0700 (PDT), "John B." > > > > <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >On May 7, 8:50=A0pm, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, 07 May 2010 11:30:25 -0500, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > >> >So open the flood gate of legal drugs =A0TO MILLIONS WHO MIGHT THEN DO > >> >HARM TO OTHERS. > > >> It's an assumption that legalization would increase drug use. =A0Fact is > >> that drugs are easily =A0available to anyone who wants them. =A0Right now= > >, > >> it's easier for a High School kid to get illegal drugs than alcohol. > >> So the idea that legalization would increase drug use is by no means a > >> proven hypothesis. And even if it did, most people who try drugs, or > >> alcohol, never develop a problem. =A0 > > >They are not easy to get for anyone who wants them. If I wanted to buy > >cocaine or heroin, I would have no idea how to do it. > > What can I say John, you're just not cool. I used to be.
From: John B. on 9 May 2010 18:22
On May 9, 12:11 pm, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote: > On Sat, 8 May 2010 10:08:09 -0700 (PDT), "John B." > > <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Our legal system makes it a criminal offense to be in the US illegally.. > > >Except if you come from Cuba. The moment a Cuban refugee sets foot on > >US soil, he's legal. > > Other national groups who suffer political opression like the Cubans > are also allowed to stay. Others have to apply for refugee status. No one else gets it automatically. |