Liberal solution to illegal immigration
in [Golf]
|
Prev: March of the Titans (brief video re: White Race, 1 min, 30sec)
Next: What the heck is Tiger doing?
From: bknight on 9 May 2010 19:45 On Sun, 9 May 2010 12:23:12 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >In article <30ndu5lm69pv7oi22otqjouj3mq8cvqq53(a)4ax.com>, >bknight(a)conramp.net says... >> ....Please provide proof that US nationals can be majority owners of >> ....real property in Mexico. >> >> You asked for proof, suggesting there is none, it and when it is given >> become your slimy self. >> >> Keep digging this hole. > >That was not the original question Bobby. But it was one that you asked, having suggested you didn't believe it. When it was answered, making you look as foolish as you are, you try to dismiss it. BK
From: bknight on 9 May 2010 19:51 On Sun, 09 May 2010 14:15:59 -0400, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote: >On Sat, 08 May 2010 21:02:28 -0500, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: > >>On Sat, 08 May 2010 21:34:49 -0400, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> >>wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 07 May 2010 20:13:39 -0500, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: >>> >>>>>On Fri, 07 May 2010 12:01:06 -0500, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>It's insane to give such freedom when you are assured that it will, in >>>>>>fact, cause harm to others. Your opinion would be different if a >>>>>>loved one was killed by someone driving a car while high on cocaine. >>>>>>If not, you're certainly in the minority. >>>>>> >>>>>>BK >>>>> >>>>>Just because cocaine is legal doesn't mean that driving under the >>>>>influence of cocaine would be legal. Alcohol is legal. >>>> >>>>You aren't thinking very straight. Driving under the influence of >>>>either is illegal now. Why would that change? >>>> >>>>BK >>> >>>You were inferring that my opinion on legalization would be different >>>if a loved one were killed by someone under the influence of cocaine. >>>But to me it's irrelevant because driving under the influence of all >>>drugs would still be illegal. Tens of thousands of people are killed >>>every year in the US by people driving under the influence of alcohol >>>and I don't think that alcohol should be illegal. Why should any >>>other drugs be different? >> >>What part of " driving under the influence of >>either is illegal now. Why would that change?" did you not >>understand? >> >>BK > >I understand that you're confused. > >You said, "Your opinion would be different if a loved one was killed >by someone driving a car while high on cocaine." > >And I'm saying that it would not alter my opinion a bit. I'm not confused. You're a cold, self-centered voluptuary. BK
From: bknight on 9 May 2010 19:55 On Sun, 9 May 2010 15:09:34 -0700 (PDT), "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On May 9, 1:07�am, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: >> In article <e9313f6a-885e-44f8-b4cb-5362aeb48277 >> @b7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>, johnb...(a)gmail.com says... >> >> >> >> >> >> > On May 8, 7:01�pm, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: >> > > In article <vunbu5h4vpn0f3edg9q2n03slsuhm87...(a)4ax.com>, >> > > how...(a)brazee.net says... >> >> > > > On Sat, 8 May 2010 08:56:27 -0400, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: >> >> > > > >Mexicans nationals cannot own property in the US. >> >> > > > Why not? >> >> > > It is all part of the reciprocity argument. Non Mexicans are not allowed >> > > to be majority owners of property in Mexico. Just turn the tables on >> > > them when in our contry. >> >> > How is that reciprocal when Americans can own property in Mexico? >> >> Please provide proof that US nationals can be majority owners of real >> property in Mexico. > >Why do you have to have everything proven to you? Are you too lazy to >research anything on your own? I attended a language school in >Cuernavaca, Mexico that was owned by Americans. Now you'll get a whiney message that this wasn't his original issue. Seems clear-cut to me. BK
From: Jack Hollis on 9 May 2010 20:24 On Sun, 09 May 2010 18:51:18 -0500, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: >>You said, "Your opinion would be different if a loved one was killed >>by someone driving a car while high on cocaine." >> >>And I'm saying that it would not alter my opinion a bit. > >I'm not confused. You're a cold, self-centered voluptuary. > >BK I'm sorry but I think that society would be much better off if drugs were legal. As far as me personally, the fact that they were illegal never stopped me for a minute.
From: bknight on 9 May 2010 20:27
On Sun, 09 May 2010 20:24:47 -0400, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote: >On Sun, 09 May 2010 18:51:18 -0500, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: > >>>You said, "Your opinion would be different if a loved one was killed >>>by someone driving a car while high on cocaine." >>> >>>And I'm saying that it would not alter my opinion a bit. >> >>I'm not confused. You're a cold, self-centered voluptuary. >> >>BK > >I'm sorry but I think that society would be much better off if drugs >were legal. As far as me personally, the fact that they were illegal >never stopped me for a minute. You might want to look up the definition of voluptuary. BK |