Liberal solution to illegal immigration
in [Golf]
|
Prev: March of the Titans (brief video re: White Race, 1 min, 30sec)
Next: What the heck is Tiger doing?
From: Jack Hollis on 9 May 2010 21:00 On Sun, 09 May 2010 19:27:44 -0500, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: >On Sun, 09 May 2010 20:24:47 -0400, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> >wrote: > >>On Sun, 09 May 2010 18:51:18 -0500, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: >> >>>>You said, "Your opinion would be different if a loved one was killed >>>>by someone driving a car while high on cocaine." >>>> >>>>And I'm saying that it would not alter my opinion a bit. >>> >>>I'm not confused. You're a cold, self-centered voluptuary. >>> >>>BK >> >>I'm sorry but I think that society would be much better off if drugs >>were legal. As far as me personally, the fact that they were illegal >>never stopped me for a minute. > >You might want to look up the definition of voluptuary. You might want to think twice about judging other people.
From: Carbon on 9 May 2010 21:07 On Sun, 09 May 2010 18:55:48 -0500, bknight wrote: > On Sun, 9 May 2010 15:09:34 -0700 (PDT), "John B." > <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On May 9, 1:07 am, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: >> >>> Please provide proof that US nationals can be majority owners of >>> real property in Mexico. >> >> Why do you have to have everything proven to you? Are you too lazy to >> research anything on your own? I attended a language school in >> Cuernavaca, Mexico that was owned by Americans. > > Now you'll get a whiney message that this wasn't his original issue. > > Seems clear-cut to me. Standard Bert stalling tactic. He's unwilling or unable to actually think, so when cornered he resorts to non sequiturs, to transparent attempts to move the goalposts, and my favorite, trying to get others to prove things that are either completely obvious or which are clearly stated as opinion. I personally enjoy the prove-its the most, because he's probably spewed more unsubstantiated bullshit here than anyone.
From: bknight on 9 May 2010 22:03 On Sun, 09 May 2010 21:00:42 -0400, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote: >On Sun, 09 May 2010 19:27:44 -0500, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: > >>On Sun, 09 May 2010 20:24:47 -0400, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> >>wrote: >> >>>On Sun, 09 May 2010 18:51:18 -0500, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: >>> >>>>>You said, "Your opinion would be different if a loved one was killed >>>>>by someone driving a car while high on cocaine." >>>>> >>>>>And I'm saying that it would not alter my opinion a bit. >>>> >>>>I'm not confused. You're a cold, self-centered voluptuary. >>>> >>>>BK >>> >>>I'm sorry but I think that society would be much better off if drugs >>>were legal. As far as me personally, the fact that they were illegal >>>never stopped me for a minute. >> >>You might want to look up the definition of voluptuary. > >You might want to think twice about judging other people. Not a judgment on my part, but a reflection on how you have described yourself. BK
From: kenpitts on 9 May 2010 22:32 On May 9, 9:13 am, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > On Sun, 09 May 2010 09:58:26 -0400, BAR wrote: > > In article <4be6bd3c$0$21861$9a6e1...(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > > nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > >> On Sun, 09 May 2010 01:07:56 -0400, BAR wrote: > >>> In article <e9313f6a-885e-44f8-b4cb-5362aeb48277 > >>> @b7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>, johnb...(a)gmail.com says... > > >>>> How is that reciprocal when Americans can own property in Mexico? > > >>> Please provide proof that US nationals can be majority owners of > >>> real property in Mexico. > > >> Please provide proof that rounding up undocumented workers by the > >> thousands and murdering them is a good idea. > > > Nice try buddy. The legal term is illegal aliens. > > > I never said anything about rounding up illegal aliens and murdering > > them. What I said is we round up illegal aliens and we ship them back > > to their country of origin. > > > What we need to do is put the US military on our borders and shoot > > anyone trying to enter the country illegally. > > Please provide proof that putting the US military on the border and > shooting anyone trying to enter the country illegally is a good idea.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Proof? We don't need no stinking proof. It is clearly a good idea. Ken
From: bknight on 9 May 2010 22:38
On Sun, 9 May 2010 19:32:04 -0700 (PDT), kenpitts <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On May 9, 9:13�am, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >> On Sun, 09 May 2010 09:58:26 -0400, BAR wrote: >> > In article <4be6bd3c$0$21861$9a6e1...(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, >> > nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... >> >> On Sun, 09 May 2010 01:07:56 -0400, BAR wrote: >> >>> In article <e9313f6a-885e-44f8-b4cb-5362aeb48277 >> >>> @b7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>, johnb...(a)gmail.com says... >> >> >>>> How is that reciprocal when Americans can own property in Mexico? >> >> >>> Please provide proof that US nationals can be majority owners of >> >>> real property in Mexico. >> >> >> Please provide proof that rounding up undocumented workers by the >> >> thousands and murdering them is a good idea. >> >> > Nice try buddy. The legal term is illegal aliens. >> >> > I never said anything about rounding up illegal aliens and murdering >> > them. What I said is we round up illegal aliens and we ship them back >> > to their country of origin. >> >> > What we need to do is put the US military on our borders and shoot >> > anyone trying to enter the country illegally. >> >> Please provide proof that putting the US military on the border and >> shooting anyone trying to enter the country illegally is a good idea.- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > >Proof? We don't need no stinking proof. It is clearly a good idea. > >Ken I'm truly sorry that you think this Ken. It's reprehensible and I thought better of you. BK |