Liberal solution to illegal immigration
in [Golf]
|
Prev: March of the Titans (brief video re: White Race, 1 min, 30sec)
Next: What the heck is Tiger doing?
From: Carbon on 9 May 2010 22:55 On Sun, 09 May 2010 19:32:04 -0700, kenpitts wrote: > On May 9, 9:13 am, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > >> Please provide proof that putting the US military on the border and >> shooting anyone trying to enter the country illegally is a good idea. > > Proof? We don't need no stinking proof. It is clearly a good idea. Ken, are you sure you don't want to re-think this one a little bit? Bert here is advocating murdering everyone who appears like they might be trying to cross the border illegally.
From: kenpitts on 9 May 2010 23:17 On May 9, 9:38 pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > On Sun, 9 May 2010 19:32:04 -0700 (PDT), kenpitts <ken.p...(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > >On May 9, 9:13 am, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, 09 May 2010 09:58:26 -0400, BAR wrote: > >> > In article <4be6bd3c$0$21861$9a6e1...(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > >> > nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > >> >> On Sun, 09 May 2010 01:07:56 -0400, BAR wrote: > >> >>> In article <e9313f6a-885e-44f8-b4cb-5362aeb48277 > >> >>> @b7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>, johnb...(a)gmail.com says... > > >> >>>> How is that reciprocal when Americans can own property in Mexico? > > >> >>> Please provide proof that US nationals can be majority owners of > >> >>> real property in Mexico. > > >> >> Please provide proof that rounding up undocumented workers by the > >> >> thousands and murdering them is a good idea. > > >> > Nice try buddy. The legal term is illegal aliens. > > >> > I never said anything about rounding up illegal aliens and murdering > >> > them. What I said is we round up illegal aliens and we ship them back > >> > to their country of origin. > > >> > What we need to do is put the US military on our borders and shoot > >> > anyone trying to enter the country illegally. > > >> Please provide proof that putting the US military on the border and > >> shooting anyone trying to enter the country illegally is a good idea.- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text - > > >Proof? We don't need no stinking proof. It is clearly a good idea. > > >Ken > > I'm truly sorry that you think this Ken. It's reprehensible and I > thought better of you. > > BK- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - You don't think it is a good idea to enforce our border and turn around people who are entering illegally? I am the one who feels sorry for you. I may have already related this. Before my brother in law became a citizen, he crossed the border from Vancouver and had forgotten his green card. He was detained for one hour while his information was verified. It was indeed verified. He had to pay a nominal fine for not being in possession of his green card and then he was on his way. Please explain to me how this is a problem for people who are suppsed to be here. Be here legally if you want to be here. My wife and all my in-laws are legal residents. Those who are not legal should go back from whence they came. No exceptions, zero tolerance. Ken
From: Alan Baker on 9 May 2010 23:23 In article <84gc8uFa1kU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > news:alangbaker-2B009B.09562006052010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > In article <84ga11Fr99U1(a)mid.individual.net>, > > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > > > > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > > > news:alangbaker-98304B.23405105052010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > > > In article <84f553Fm3qU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > > > > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > > > > > news:alangbaker-2DD8BA.21542905052010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > > > > > In article <t0e3u59l82g1f7i53jt4jsofo7f7b81mno(a)4ax.com>, > > > > > > bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I am. > > > > > > > > > > > > What business has the state in telling you what you do to > yourself? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Because few men are islands. Getting stoned everyday has a direct > > > effect on > > > > > other people. Duh! > > > > > > Children for example. Drug users spawn. You think somebody high on Meth > is > > > a good parent. Duh! > > > > You think that drug prohibition is preventing this? Duh! > > Actually I do. In some cases it the consequences of prison leads to > rehabilitation. Robert Downey Jr. is an example. That is an empty assertion, Greg. Let's see you support it. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Alan Baker on 9 May 2010 23:23 In article <84gghpF5toU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > news:alangbaker-4D19C7.09554806052010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > In article > > <df176351-2919-4594-b37f-d5879968a0c0(a)r34g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>, > > "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 6, 2:40 am, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > > > > In article <84f553Fm3...(a)mid.individual.net>, > > > > > > > > "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > > > > "Alan Baker" <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote in message > > > > >news:alangbaker-2DD8BA.21542905052010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > > > > > In article <t0e3u59l82g1f7i53jt4jsofo7f7b81...(a)4ax.com>, > > > > > > bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I am. > > > > > > > > > > What business has the state in telling you what you do to > yourself? > > > > > > > > > Because few men are islands. Getting stoned everyday has a direct > effect > > > > > on > > > > > other people. Duh! > > > > > > > > Such as? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Go back to nitpicking and leave sincere discussion to grownups. > > > > > > > > LOL > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Alan Baker > > > > Vancouver, British Columbia > > > > <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg> > > > > > > "LOL" is a very weak rhetorical device. > > > > And it was all that was required for the sentence it answered. > > If Alan was honest, he'd admit that it's the most intelligent answer he can > come up with. There is a reason why he shirks normal discussion. He's just > isn't particularily bright. > > -Greg LOL -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: dene on 10 May 2010 00:01
"Jack Hollis" <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:7tgeu5pvpknermhfql7qki76aqo0jnjttk(a)4ax.com... > On Sun, 9 May 2010 15:16:14 -0700 (PDT), "John B." > <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >Should narcotics be sold in retail stores, like alcohol, or do you > >favor creating a government bureaucracy to dispense them? > > You could just add new product lines to your local liquor store. Good grief!! -Greg |