Prev: March of the Titans (brief video re: White Race, 1 min, 30sec)
Next: What the heck is Tiger doing?
From: bknight on 10 May 2010 13:44 On Mon, 10 May 2010 12:34:14 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > ><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >news:tvegu5569nkok2cv60lnhv8ot0ckgtkbom(a)4ax.com... >> On Mon, 10 May 2010 11:54:06 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >> >>>> Let's just get this straight. Say that there's a 40 year old man >>>> living in Mexico with his wife, two sons and a daughter. His wife is >>>> not well and he hasn't worked in weeks. Can't find a job. One of his >>>> compadres tells him that across the border in Texas he can get a job >>>> paying $20 dollars a day working in the fields, so in desperation he >>>> makes a 50 mile trip on foot, and crosses the border,hoping to stay a >>>> couple of weeks then return home to try to find work there again. >>>> >>>> Please don't tell me you would murder this man that's only trying to >>>> put food in his family's stomach, doing labor that no U.S. citizen >>>> will do. >>>> >>>> BK >>> >>>So how exactly would you weed out the "good" illegal immigrants and the >>>"bad" ones? >>> >> Thanks for making my point. There's no way, so killing all that cross >> is an immoral, and heinous, thought. >> >> BK > >How bout not killing them but keeping them ALL out? > Fine with me. I Unfortunately we haven't figured out how we can effectively do that. BK
From: dene on 10 May 2010 14:49 "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:17ce7bd0-2d0f-4b47-8e7b-6661974c7a15(a)g21g2000yqk.googlegroups.com... On May 10, 12:28 am, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > In article <84pen9Fo3...(a)mid.individual.net>, > > > > "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > "Jack Hollis" <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote in message > >news:6b4cu5t9lse4nqb11m6vgkfgf6pq8obspn(a)4ax.com... > > > On Fri, 07 May 2010 19:17:45 -0600, Howard Brazee <how...(a)brazee.net> > > > wrote: > > > > >On Thu, 06 May 2010 21:00:34 -0400, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> > > > >wrote: > > > > >>I'm an ex police officer and I saw the futility of drug laws first > > > >>hand. Putting people in jail for using drugs is idiotic. They should > > > >>legalize all drugs and immediately release all the people in prison > > > >>for possession of drugs, or possession with intent to sell, as long as > > > >>there were no extraneous circumstances like gun possession or > > > >>resisting arrest. > > > > >Legalize the drugs, but be careful about releasing criminals just > > > >because the crime was redefined. Especially those who were in > > > >dangerous criminal organizations. > > > > Once drugs were legal, those dangerous organizations would be out of > > > the drug business. > > > Really. Gambling is legal in Nv. Did that keep the Mob out? What finally > > rooted them out of Vegas was good law enforcement. Same thing applies with > > the drug cartels. > > What rooted them out was cost/benefit analysis. > What ran the Mafia out of Las Vegas was a relentless assault by the FBI. ---------------------------------------------------------- Exactly. That is what Casino depicted. -Greg
From: BAR on 10 May 2010 18:55 In article <b42612b0-f940-4eb0-8e68- bc25c871b44a(a)e28g2000vbd.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says... > > On May 9, 1:07�am, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > > In article <e9313f6a-885e-44f8-b4cb-5362aeb48277 > > @b7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>, johnb...(a)gmail.com says... > > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 8, 7:01�pm, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > > > > In article <vunbu5h4vpn0f3edg9q2n03slsuhm87...(a)4ax.com>, > > > > how...(a)brazee.net says... > > > > > > > On Sat, 8 May 2010 08:56:27 -0400, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >Mexicans nationals cannot own property in the US. > > > > > > > Why not? > > > > > > It is all part of the reciprocity argument. Non Mexicans are not allowed > > > > to be majority owners of property in Mexico. Just turn the tables on > > > > them when in our contry. > > > > > How is that reciprocal when Americans can own property in Mexico? > > > > Please provide proof that US nationals can be majority owners of real > > property in Mexico. > > Why do you have to have everything proven to you? Are you too lazy to > research anything on your own? I attended a language school in > Cuernavaca, Mexico that was owned by Americans. You are one of the most naive and gullible people I have ever come across.
From: BAR on 10 May 2010 18:55 In article <457cf279-2014-443a-b7f5-ee36a8baf4d3 @k31g2000vbu.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says... > > On May 9, 9:58�am, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > > In article <4be6bd3c$0$21861$9a6e1...(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > > nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 09 May 2010 01:07:56 -0400, BAR wrote: > > > > In article <e9313f6a-885e-44f8-b4cb-5362aeb48277 > > > > @b7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>, johnb...(a)gmail.com says... > > > > > >> How is that reciprocal when Americans can own property in Mexico? > > > > > > Please provide proof that US nationals can be majority owners of real > > > > property in Mexico. > > > > > Please provide proof that rounding up undocumented workers by the > > > thousands and murdering them is a good idea. > > > > Nice try buddy. The legal term is illegal aliens. > > > > I never said anything about rounding up illegal aliens and murdering > > them. What I said is we round up illegal aliens and we ship them back to > > their country of origin. > > > > What we need to do is put the US military on our borders and shoot > > anyone trying to enter the country illegally. > > You also said that illegal aliens caught here should be tattooed, like > the Nazis did to Jews. No, I said we should tattoo those caught here as illegal aliens and then deport them. The scarlet letter has its uses.
From: BAR on 10 May 2010 19:57
In article <b7a230ab-06a3-4fd7-9b9d-c3656cb2d549 @j35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says... > > On May 9, 10:32�pm, kenpitts <ken.p...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > On May 9, 9:13�am, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 09 May 2010 09:58:26 -0400, BAR wrote: > > > > In article <4be6bd3c$0$21861$9a6e1...(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > > > > nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > > > >> On Sun, 09 May 2010 01:07:56 -0400, BAR wrote: > > > >>> In article <e9313f6a-885e-44f8-b4cb-5362aeb48277 > > > >>> @b7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>, johnb...(a)gmail.com says... > > > > > >>>> How is that reciprocal when Americans can own property in Mexico? > > > > > >>> Please provide proof that US nationals can be majority owners of > > > >>> real property in Mexico. > > > > > >> Please provide proof that rounding up undocumented workers by the > > > >> thousands and murdering them is a good idea. > > > > > > Nice try buddy. The legal term is illegal aliens. > > > > > > I never said anything about rounding up illegal aliens and murdering > > > > them. What I said is we round up illegal aliens and we ship them back > > > > to their country of origin. > > > > > > What we need to do is put the US military on our borders and shoot > > > > anyone trying to enter the country illegally. > > > > > Please provide proof that putting the US military on the border and > > > shooting anyone trying to enter the country illegally is a good idea.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > Proof? We don't need no stinking proof. It is clearly a good idea. > > > > Ken > > If you're stupid and barbaric. Do you have locks on the doors of your house and cars? If yes, why? |