From: bknight on
On Mon, 10 May 2010 12:34:14 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
wrote:

>
><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
>news:tvegu5569nkok2cv60lnhv8ot0ckgtkbom(a)4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 10 May 2010 11:54:06 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
>>
>>>> Let's just get this straight. Say that there's a 40 year old man
>>>> living in Mexico with his wife, two sons and a daughter. His wife is
>>>> not well and he hasn't worked in weeks. Can't find a job. One of his
>>>> compadres tells him that across the border in Texas he can get a job
>>>> paying $20 dollars a day working in the fields, so in desperation he
>>>> makes a 50 mile trip on foot, and crosses the border,hoping to stay a
>>>> couple of weeks then return home to try to find work there again.
>>>>
>>>> Please don't tell me you would murder this man that's only trying to
>>>> put food in his family's stomach, doing labor that no U.S. citizen
>>>> will do.
>>>>
>>>> BK
>>>
>>>So how exactly would you weed out the "good" illegal immigrants and the
>>>"bad" ones?
>>>
>> Thanks for making my point. There's no way, so killing all that cross
>> is an immoral, and heinous, thought.
>>
>> BK
>
>How bout not killing them but keeping them ALL out?
>
Fine with me. I Unfortunately we haven't figured out how we can
effectively do that.

BK
From: dene on

"John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:17ce7bd0-2d0f-4b47-8e7b-6661974c7a15(a)g21g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
On May 10, 12:28 am, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote:
> In article <84pen9Fo3...(a)mid.individual.net>,
>
>
>
> "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote:
> > "Jack Hollis" <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote in message
> >news:6b4cu5t9lse4nqb11m6vgkfgf6pq8obspn(a)4ax.com...
> > > On Fri, 07 May 2010 19:17:45 -0600, Howard Brazee <how...(a)brazee.net>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > >On Thu, 06 May 2010 21:00:34 -0400, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com>
> > > >wrote:
>
> > > >>I'm an ex police officer and I saw the futility of drug laws first
> > > >>hand. Putting people in jail for using drugs is idiotic. They should
> > > >>legalize all drugs and immediately release all the people in prison
> > > >>for possession of drugs, or possession with intent to sell, as long
as
> > > >>there were no extraneous circumstances like gun possession or
> > > >>resisting arrest.
>
> > > >Legalize the drugs, but be careful about releasing criminals just
> > > >because the crime was redefined. Especially those who were in
> > > >dangerous criminal organizations.
>
> > > Once drugs were legal, those dangerous organizations would be out of
> > > the drug business.
>
> > Really. Gambling is legal in Nv. Did that keep the Mob out? What finally
> > rooted them out of Vegas was good law enforcement. Same thing applies
with
> > the drug cartels.
>
> What rooted them out was cost/benefit analysis.
>
What ran the Mafia out of Las Vegas was a relentless assault by the
FBI.

----------------------------------------------------------

Exactly. That is what Casino depicted.

-Greg


From: BAR on
In article <b42612b0-f940-4eb0-8e68-
bc25c871b44a(a)e28g2000vbd.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says...
>
> On May 9, 1:07�am, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote:
> > In article <e9313f6a-885e-44f8-b4cb-5362aeb48277
> > @b7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>, johnb...(a)gmail.com says...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On May 8, 7:01�pm, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote:
> > > > In article <vunbu5h4vpn0f3edg9q2n03slsuhm87...(a)4ax.com>,
> > > > how...(a)brazee.net says...
> >
> > > > > On Sat, 8 May 2010 08:56:27 -0400, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > >Mexicans nationals cannot own property in the US.
> >
> > > > > Why not?
> >
> > > > It is all part of the reciprocity argument. Non Mexicans are not allowed
> > > > to be majority owners of property in Mexico. Just turn the tables on
> > > > them when in our contry.
> >
> > > How is that reciprocal when Americans can own property in Mexico?
> >
> > Please provide proof that US nationals can be majority owners of real
> > property in Mexico.
>
> Why do you have to have everything proven to you? Are you too lazy to
> research anything on your own? I attended a language school in
> Cuernavaca, Mexico that was owned by Americans.

You are one of the most naive and gullible people I have ever come
across.
From: BAR on
In article <457cf279-2014-443a-b7f5-ee36a8baf4d3
@k31g2000vbu.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says...
>
> On May 9, 9:58�am, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote:
> > In article <4be6bd3c$0$21861$9a6e1...(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>,
> > nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says...
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Sun, 09 May 2010 01:07:56 -0400, BAR wrote:
> > > > In article <e9313f6a-885e-44f8-b4cb-5362aeb48277
> > > > @b7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>, johnb...(a)gmail.com says...
> >
> > > >> How is that reciprocal when Americans can own property in Mexico?
> >
> > > > Please provide proof that US nationals can be majority owners of real
> > > > property in Mexico.
> >
> > > Please provide proof that rounding up undocumented workers by the
> > > thousands and murdering them is a good idea.
> >
> > Nice try buddy. The legal term is illegal aliens.
> >
> > I never said anything about rounding up illegal aliens and murdering
> > them. What I said is we round up illegal aliens and we ship them back to
> > their country of origin.
> >
> > What we need to do is put the US military on our borders and shoot
> > anyone trying to enter the country illegally.
>
> You also said that illegal aliens caught here should be tattooed, like
> the Nazis did to Jews.

No, I said we should tattoo those caught here as illegal aliens and then
deport them. The scarlet letter has its uses.

From: BAR on
In article <b7a230ab-06a3-4fd7-9b9d-c3656cb2d549
@j35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says...
>
> On May 9, 10:32�pm, kenpitts <ken.p...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > On May 9, 9:13�am, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Sun, 09 May 2010 09:58:26 -0400, BAR wrote:
> > > > In article <4be6bd3c$0$21861$9a6e1...(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>,
> > > > nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says...
> > > >> On Sun, 09 May 2010 01:07:56 -0400, BAR wrote:
> > > >>> In article <e9313f6a-885e-44f8-b4cb-5362aeb48277
> > > >>> @b7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>, johnb...(a)gmail.com says...
> >
> > > >>>> How is that reciprocal when Americans can own property in Mexico?
> >
> > > >>> Please provide proof that US nationals can be majority owners of
> > > >>> real property in Mexico.
> >
> > > >> Please provide proof that rounding up undocumented workers by the
> > > >> thousands and murdering them is a good idea.
> >
> > > > Nice try buddy. The legal term is illegal aliens.
> >
> > > > I never said anything about rounding up illegal aliens and murdering
> > > > them. What I said is we round up illegal aliens and we ship them back
> > > > to their country of origin.
> >
> > > > What we need to do is put the US military on our borders and shoot
> > > > anyone trying to enter the country illegally.
> >
> > > Please provide proof that putting the US military on the border and
> > > shooting anyone trying to enter the country illegally is a good idea.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > Proof? We don't need no stinking proof. It is clearly a good idea.
> >
> > Ken
>
> If you're stupid and barbaric.

Do you have locks on the doors of your house and cars? If yes, why?