Mass.acre!
in [Golf]
|
From: Howard Brazee on 20 Jan 2010 14:45 On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:37:09 -0800 (PST), Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote: >With respect to reality, about 85% or so of Americans have health >insurance, and about that same number, 85% are happy with it. About >10% or so can afford health insurance but choose not to buy it, >leaving about 5% or so who want the insurance but can't afford it. So >how much do we sell out the interests of the 95% for the sake of 5%? >If *YOU* want health insurance, *YOU* can buy it. Who else is supposed >to pay for your insurance? Don't forget that the 10% without health insurance get treated anyway when they need expensive care, and the hospitals include their costs in what they charge the rest of us. -- "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department." - James Madison
From: Howard Brazee on 20 Jan 2010 14:46 On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:13:29 -0600, "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: >Ah the sheep. Every time the Democrats lose an election it is, because the >electorate are so stupid. And why is it that when the Republicans lose? -- "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department." - James Madison
From: Dinosaur_Sr on 20 Jan 2010 15:18 On Jan 20, 2:45 pm, Howard Brazee <how...(a)brazee.net> wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:37:09 -0800 (PST), Dinosaur_Sr > > <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote: > >With respect to reality, about 85% or so of Americans have health > >insurance, and about that same number, 85% are happy with it. About > >10% or so can afford health insurance but choose not to buy it, > >leaving about 5% or so who want the insurance but can't afford it. So > >how much do we sell out the interests of the 95% for the sake of 5%? > >If *YOU* want health insurance, *YOU* can buy it. Who else is supposed > >to pay for your insurance? > > Don't forget that the 10% without health insurance get treated anyway > when they need expensive care, and the hospitals include their costs > in what they charge the rest of us. > So someone gets run over by a bus and we are supposed to leave them on the street? Or somehow we are going to not send them to an emergency room? What fraction of that 10% needs such care per year anyways? It's a very small fraction of the total cost of healthcare, and no reason to sell out the interests of the 90%. IMHO, just pass a law that says you can't bankruptcy your way out of hospital bills and make 'em pay.
From: Dinosaur_Sr on 20 Jan 2010 15:19 On Jan 20, 2:46 pm, Howard Brazee <how...(a)brazee.net> wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:13:29 -0600, "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> > wrote: > > >Ah the sheep. Every time the Democrats lose an election it is, because the > >electorate are so stupid. > > And why is it that when the Republicans lose? Big spending. those 400 billion dollar deficits killed them more than anything else.
From: MNMikeW on 20 Jan 2010 15:42
"R&B" <none_of_your_business(a)all.com> wrote in message news:2010012013205616807-noneofyourbusiness(a)allcom... > You and your insurance company pals are lower than Al Queda and the > terrorists. You just kill Americans (or let them die) FOR THE MONEY. > You're all sick fucks at your core, and Dene, I think anyone who's ever > read one of your posts on this subject here in RSG gets a real clear > picture of what kind of human being you are. It's no accident you were > bestowed the title of "The Turd In The Punchbowl." You earned it. > > There isn't a hell hot enough for the likes of you. But I'm betting one > is being prepared for you right now. > > Randy > You do realize your credibility goes right down the toilet with your textbook rants like this. Not that you had much to begin with. |