Mass.acre!
in [Golf]
|
From: William Clark on 31 Jan 2010 20:24 In article <MPG.25cfbb4cd57c2c1c989af9(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <wclark2-B556B4.15381231012010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > > > In article <MPG.25cfa9ff3a9664989af8(a)news.giganews.com>, > > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > > > > In article <wclark2-DAADE6.12352231012010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > > state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you are so cocksure you are right why not take the bet. You > > > > > > > get > > > > > > > $5K > > > > > > > and you get to nail a college prof to the wall. "Dr." Phil Jones > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > UEA's CRU nailed himself without a bet. > > > > > > > > > > > > I have provided him with the evidence for free. I am not not taking > > > > > > his > > > > > > money. > > > > > > > > > > Right. You have doubts and you don't want to lose the money and more > > > > > of > > > > > your credibility. > > > > > > > > No, his is clearly already gone. Your stupid bet is just blowhard > > > > posturing. > > > > > > You are bluster and blather. When it comes to putting yourself on the > > > line you always run and hide. > > > > You really don't have a clue, do you, about the ethics of scholarship? > > No one makes "bets", it is all out in the open. I don't hide behind some > > on line name, for example, like you do. I expect Rob, as an academic, > > not to claim he has published where he clearly has not, and to be open > > about it. If he can't be trusted to tell the truth about his > > publications, then none of their content can be trusted either. > > Billy you are the admitted liar. > > You got beaten, and badly, at your own semantics game. Oh, now you are completely off your rocker. Please do not try to weasel this around. Rob blew smoke, and when he was called on it, cannot admit that he did. However, the facts speak very differently, and verify that he did, and I care far more about them than your venom filled opinion.
From: BAR on 1 Feb 2010 07:27 In article <4b662375$0$5081$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > > On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 08:17:50 -0800, Dinosaur_Sr wrote: > > On Jan 30, 2:04�pm, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > > > If you look at it from the point of view of what the govt provides, > > then yes, Canada does a "better job". If you look at it from the point > > of view of what is actually available, none compare to that of the US, > > it is so far superior that it shames the rest of the world. > > Here, let me fix that up for you: > > If you look at it from the point of view of what the govt provides, then > yes, Canada does a "better job". If you look at it from the point of > view of what is actually available for the wealthy, none compare to that > of the US for the wealthy, it is so far superior for the wealthy that it > shames the US in the eyes of the rest of the world. Why does the USA have an immigration problem? Is it because of the lousy way we treat people within our borders? No, it is because of the promise, or was, of freedom. Freedom to work hard, earn much and enjoy the fruits of your labor. People do not emigration to places like Cuba so that they can toil in the fields of a workers a paradise where the fruits of their labor can be taken from them because it is the property of the state. Individualism is the key. The sad part is that you fail to understand that I get to do what I want and you get to do what you want. But, what you want is for me to do what you want, which is sad, very sad.
From: BAR on 1 Feb 2010 07:32 In article <wclark2-B71F0B.20241531012010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > In article <MPG.25cfbb4cd57c2c1c989af9(a)news.giganews.com>, > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > > In article <wclark2-B556B4.15381231012010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > > > > > In article <MPG.25cfa9ff3a9664989af8(a)news.giganews.com>, > > > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > > > > > > In article <wclark2-DAADE6.12352231012010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > > > state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you are so cocksure you are right why not take the bet. You > > > > > > > > get > > > > > > > > $5K > > > > > > > > and you get to nail a college prof to the wall. "Dr." Phil Jones > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > UEA's CRU nailed himself without a bet. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have provided him with the evidence for free. I am not not taking > > > > > > > his > > > > > > > money. > > > > > > > > > > > > Right. You have doubts and you don't want to lose the money and more > > > > > > of > > > > > > your credibility. > > > > > > > > > > No, his is clearly already gone. Your stupid bet is just blowhard > > > > > posturing. > > > > > > > > You are bluster and blather. When it comes to putting yourself on the > > > > line you always run and hide. > > > > > > You really don't have a clue, do you, about the ethics of scholarship? > > > No one makes "bets", it is all out in the open. I don't hide behind some > > > on line name, for example, like you do. I expect Rob, as an academic, > > > not to claim he has published where he clearly has not, and to be open > > > about it. If he can't be trusted to tell the truth about his > > > publications, then none of their content can be trusted either. > > > > Billy you are the admitted liar. > > > > You got beaten, and badly, at your own semantics game. > > Oh, now you are completely off your rocker. Please do not try to weasel > this around. Rob blew smoke, and when he was called on it, cannot admit > that he did. However, the facts speak very differently, and verify that > he did, and I care far more about them than your venom filled opinion. What facts Billy? Rob said he had papers published in the field of materials science. You said he didn't. He proved you wrong.
From: William Clark on 1 Feb 2010 10:12 In article <MPG.25d093e1e522a89c989afc(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <wclark2-B71F0B.20241531012010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > > > In article <MPG.25cfbb4cd57c2c1c989af9(a)news.giganews.com>, > > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > > > > In article <wclark2-B556B4.15381231012010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > > state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > > > > > > > In article <MPG.25cfa9ff3a9664989af8(a)news.giganews.com>, > > > > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > In article <wclark2-DAADE6.12352231012010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > > > > state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you are so cocksure you are right why not take the bet. > > > > > > > > > You > > > > > > > > > get > > > > > > > > > $5K > > > > > > > > > and you get to nail a college prof to the wall. "Dr." Phil > > > > > > > > > Jones > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > UEA's CRU nailed himself without a bet. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have provided him with the evidence for free. I am not not > > > > > > > > taking > > > > > > > > his > > > > > > > > money. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Right. You have doubts and you don't want to lose the money and > > > > > > > more > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > your credibility. > > > > > > > > > > > > No, his is clearly already gone. Your stupid bet is just blowhard > > > > > > posturing. > > > > > > > > > > You are bluster and blather. When it comes to putting yourself on the > > > > > line you always run and hide. > > > > > > > > You really don't have a clue, do you, about the ethics of scholarship? > > > > No one makes "bets", it is all out in the open. I don't hide behind > > > > some > > > > on line name, for example, like you do. I expect Rob, as an academic, > > > > not to claim he has published where he clearly has not, and to be open > > > > about it. If he can't be trusted to tell the truth about his > > > > publications, then none of their content can be trusted either. > > > > > > Billy you are the admitted liar. > > > > > > You got beaten, and badly, at your own semantics game. > > > > Oh, now you are completely off your rocker. Please do not try to weasel > > this around. Rob blew smoke, and when he was called on it, cannot admit > > that he did. However, the facts speak very differently, and verify that > > he did, and I care far more about them than your venom filled opinion. > > What facts Billy? Rob said he had papers published in the field of > materials science. You said he didn't. He proved you wrong. How did he prove me wrong? He provided nothing whatever - you must be a complete loony if you think that. I, on the other hand, have evidence that none of his publications come even close to being in the field and literature of materials science. But of course, that means nothing to a wingnut like yourself.
From: Carbon on 1 Feb 2010 17:50
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 07:27:27 -0500, BAR wrote: > Why does the USA have an immigration problem? Is it because of the > lousy way we treat people within our borders? > > No, it is because of the promise, or was, of freedom. Freedom to work > hard, earn much and enjoy the fruits of your labor. > > People do not emigration to places like Cuba so that they can toil in > the fields of a workers a paradise where the fruits of their labor can > be taken from them because it is the property of the state. > > Individualism is the key. The sad part is that you fail to understand > that I get to do what I want and you get to do what you want. But, > what you want is for me to do what you want, which is sad, very sad. You seem to be laboring under the delusion that the US is the only country where you can live in freedom. |