Mass.acre!
in [Golf]
|
From: assimilate on 2 Feb 2010 23:37 On 2-Feb-2010, Don Kirkman <donsno2(a)charter.net> wrote: > >So the real deal doesn't jibe with the "Rush as boogeyman" caricature you > >have been fed and believe. Why am I not surprised. > > Sorry, Bill, but it is what it is. And that is? Anyone that says anything complimentry of Limbaugh is not credible? You're daft. -- bill-o
From: BAR on 3 Feb 2010 08:17 In article <4b688352$0$4886$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > > On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 08:02:56 -0500, BAR wrote: > > In article <4b6792b8$0$5117$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > > nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > >> On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:51:03 -0500, BAR wrote: > >>> In article <4b675aaa$0$4864$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > >>> nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > >>> > >>>> You seem to be laboring under the delusion that the US is the only > >>>> country where you can live in freedom. > >>> > >>> Ok, name another country where you are or were able to live in > >>> freedom. > >> > >> Uh, pretty much the entire first world? > > > > Sorry, you failed to name a single country. > > Playing the fool again, eh Bert? Just pointing out your inability to read and follow directions.
From: Don Kirkman on 3 Feb 2010 13:19 It seems to me I heard somewhere that assimilate(a)borg.org wrote in article <4b68fda2$0$28511$882e0bbb(a)news.ThunderNews.com>: >On 2-Feb-2010, Don Kirkman <donsno2(a)charter.net> wrote: >> >So the real deal doesn't jibe with the "Rush as boogeyman" caricature you >> >have been fed and believe. Why am I not surprised. >> Sorry, Bill, but it is what it is. >And that is? Anyone that says anything complimentry of Limbaugh is not >credible? You're daft. When that person also owns the website AND comments on San Francisco's recent history under the heading "San Francisco: America?s homegrown anarchic totalitarianism" "A quick, and personal, history of San Francisco?s decline from the 1960s to the present" might be suspected of having an agenda, don't you think? He's entitled to his views, but his remarks don't carry much weight as evidence. As is constantly being argued in this newsgroup, opinion is not equivalent to fact. -- Don Kirkman donsno2(a)charter.net
From: dene on 3 Feb 2010 15:02 "Dinosaur_Sr" <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote in message news:f19a6928-2b61-4a6d-8288-21254cae884a(a)z41g2000yqz.googlegroups.com... On Feb 3, 11:37 am, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- state.edu> wrote: > In article > > > > > You don't seem to want to take my bet, so what else is there to say? > > > > Your academic chauvinism is entertaining to me! > > > > You on the other hand, seem to need to make a "bet" in order to provide > > > something that every respectable academic does willingly and for free. > > > > Could it be that you don't actually have any publications in the > > > materials science literature? Certainly the Science Citation Index says > > > you don't, and I am more inclined to believe that than I am Bert. > > > > No, the answer is clear - you have not attended any materials science > > > symposia, nor do you have any publications in the materials science > > > journals. Pure and simple - you lied. And now you have to bluster to > > > cover it up. Shame on you. > > > I know my background. You do not, and that is a fact. You are lying > > without proper knowledge. My CV has been posted for a long time for > > anyone to look at. You are probably just envious of the fact that I am > > at least published academically in a field where your productivity is > > lacking. > > I did fid your publication list on Science Citation Index, or have you > chosen to forget that? No evidence there of any materials science > activity, so I believe that you were not telling the truth when you > claimed to have a) attended materials science symposia, and b) published > in the materials science literature. Your continued weaseling simply > reinforces that opinion. All the hot air in the world cannot make up for > that whopper. Ahh! You're green with envy aren't you! I'll defer to your cowardice, and make the bet fifty bucks! Surely you can trust your judgment for 50 bucks worth! --------------------------------------------------------- This is getting very interesting. C'mon William. What's $50? Surely your bluster...er....honor is worth more than that?? Anybody want to make a side bet of $50? My money is on Rob. -Greg
From: BAR on 3 Feb 2010 15:04
In article <7su2qsFcfqU1(a)mid.individual.net>, dene(a)remove.ipns.com says... > > "Dinosaur_Sr" <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote in message > news:f19a6928-2b61-4a6d-8288-21254cae884a(a)z41g2000yqz.googlegroups.com... > On Feb 3, 11:37 am, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- > state.edu> wrote: > > In article > > > > > > > > You don't seem to want to take my bet, so what else is there to say? > > > > > Your academic chauvinism is entertaining to me! > > > > > > You on the other hand, seem to need to make a "bet" in order to > provide > > > > something that every respectable academic does willingly and for free. > > > > > > Could it be that you don't actually have any publications in the > > > > materials science literature? Certainly the Science Citation Index > says > > > > you don't, and I am more inclined to believe that than I am Bert. > > > > > > No, the answer is clear - you have not attended any materials science > > > > symposia, nor do you have any publications in the materials science > > > > journals. Pure and simple - you lied. And now you have to bluster to > > > > cover it up. Shame on you. > > > > > I know my background. You do not, and that is a fact. You are lying > > > without proper knowledge. My CV has been posted for a long time for > > > anyone to look at. You are probably just envious of the fact that I am > > > at least published academically in a field where your productivity is > > > lacking. > > > > I did fid your publication list on Science Citation Index, or have you > > chosen to forget that? No evidence there of any materials science > > activity, so I believe that you were not telling the truth when you > > claimed to have a) attended materials science symposia, and b) published > > in the materials science literature. Your continued weaseling simply > > reinforces that opinion. All the hot air in the world cannot make up for > > that whopper. > > Ahh! You're green with envy aren't you! > > I'll defer to your cowardice, and make the bet fifty bucks! Surely you > can trust your judgment for 50 bucks worth! > > --------------------------------------------------------- > > This is getting very interesting. C'mon William. What's $50? Surely your > bluster...er....honor is worth more than that?? > > Anybody want to make a side bet of $50? My money is on Rob. My $1 bet is still on that Billy won't take the bet. |