Mass.acre!
in [Golf]
|
From: Jack Hollis on 20 Jan 2010 16:09 On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:13:10 -0600, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: >>Buy on the rumor, sell on the news. > >The news is that a Republican won Teddy Kennedy's seat Jack. So the >market sold on that fact, huh? The market went up yesterday on the expectation (rumor) that Brown would win. Today the market sold on the news that he did win.
From: Jack Hollis on 20 Jan 2010 16:22 On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:31:19 -0800, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: >"Jack Hollis" <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote in message >news:vafel55b07shsrjcaffcatctc8mlltapvb(a)4ax.com... >> On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 06:27:19 -0800 (PST), Dinosaur_Sr >> <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote: >> >> >On Jan 20, 8:35=A0am, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:26:14 -0800, "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Been watching MessNBC, including your >> >> >Rachel. >> >> >> >> I don't think I ever enjoyed watching MSNBC as much as I did last >> >> night. >> > >> >Some of the best comedy I have ever seen! >> >> Poor Rachel looked like her dog just died. > >I loved it when they interviewed the feminist, who made snide remarks about >Brown "giving away his daughters." Borat should pay her a visit. > >-Greg They tried to work in the angle that sexism was a factor in the loss.
From: Jack Hollis on 20 Jan 2010 16:27 On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:34:25 -0800, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: >"Jack Hollis" <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote in message >news:sffel51hqod1n5gvclejgcs58116t2hh5i(a)4ax.com... >> On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 06:29:03 -0800 (PST), Dinosaur_Sr > >> If I was the Democratic leadership, I would make the changes to the >> health care bill, pass it through the House and let the Republicans >> kill it in the Senate. This way they can blame the Republicans for >> killing the bill. Next I would forget about cap and tax and the union >> card check bill and move on to working on the economy. > >That's probably what they will do. The high road would be to actually >negotiate a bi partisan bill and present it to the President. It's what >they should have done in the first place. > >-Greg All they have to do is tort reform and allow people to buy only what coverage they want in any state they want. Neither proposal would cost the government a dime and it would lower costs. As you know, if they don't allow insurance companies to reject pre-exists, a lot of young people will cancel their insurance. The thing that keeps them in is the fear that they will get sick and then not be able to get coverage.
From: Chris Bellomy on 20 Jan 2010 16:39 "Massachusetts voters who backed Barack Obama in the presidential election a year ago and either switched support to Republican Senate candidate Scott Brown or simply stayed home, said in a poll conducted after the election Tuesday night that if Democrats enact tougher policies on Wall Street, they'll be more likely to come back to the party in the next election." http://www.pollingreport.com/obama_job.htm Does this *really* surprise anybody, left or right? I think the only people who don't get it live in the 202 area code. cb
From: William Clark on 20 Jan 2010 17:06
In article <2trel5phj3ph7035q06gs7re6fq21ccjho(a)4ax.com>, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:13:10 -0600, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: > > >>Buy on the rumor, sell on the news. > > > >The news is that a Republican won Teddy Kennedy's seat Jack. So the > >market sold on that fact, huh? > > The market went up yesterday on the expectation (rumor) that Brown > would win. Today the market sold on the news that he did win. BS - the markets went down on a strengthening dollar, bad earnings news from several corporations (e.g. BoA and Morgan Stanley), news of China's lending restrictions, and poor projections from IBM. The overpriced market is due for a correction, anyway. Get real. |