From: Speeders & Drunk Drivers Kill Kids on
johnty <johnty1(a)hotmail.com> wrote in news:a0425ee8-89c3-4f5e-b0b8-
b9c38bf15ad3(a)h27g2000yqm.googlegroups.com:

> On 6 Apr, 19:31, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers Kill Kids"
> <xeton2...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>> This is extremely common but the press doesn't want the public to find
>> out about it.
>>
>
> This is a very odd plan to stop the public 'finding out' about a
> story.
>
> You'd think the press might come up with something better....
>
> Like not publishing it at all.
>

Why wasn't this story on TV?
From: Howard Brazee on
On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 19:23:37 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:

>It is Democrat corruption regardless of whether it is local or not.

Which is different or more common than Republican corruption?

--
"In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
to the legislature, and not to the executive department."

- James Madison
From: BAR on
In article <a1eqr55vtc5c1f1tga362vb8d2vfrci3m4(a)4ax.com>,
howard(a)brazee.net says...
>
> On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 19:23:37 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
>
> >It is Democrat corruption regardless of whether it is local or not.
>
> Which is different or more common than Republican corruption?

Corruption should be weeded out where ever it is and from which ever
side of the political aisle it comes. The problems is that when there is
Democrat corruption it is looked upon as boys will be boys but, when
there is Republican corruption it is viewed as an all out attack against
the Republic.

The question of fairness always comes to mind. If you caught your
daughter drinking beer before she was legally able to did you treat her
any different than when you caught your son drinking been before he was
legally able to? Does fairness dictate that you treat them both equally?
Does family unity dictate that you treat them both equally?
From: Howard Brazee on
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 07:24:06 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:

>Corruption should be weeded out where ever it is and from which ever
>side of the political aisle it comes. The problems is that when there is
>Democrat corruption it is looked upon as boys will be boys but, when
>there is Republican corruption it is viewed as an all out attack against
>the Republic.

I don't see that, except that the other parties's corruptions is seen
as an all out attack. Whichever party is "other".

Where I see a difference in the parties is sexual scandals. When
they occur with people who campaigned for "family values", we have an
added complaint of someone being a hypocrite.

--
"In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
to the legislature, and not to the executive department."

- James Madison
From: John B. on
On Apr 8, 7:24 am, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote:
> In article <a1eqr55vtc5c1f1tga362vb8d2vfrci...(a)4ax.com>,
> how...(a)brazee.net says...
>
>
>
> > On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 19:23:37 -0400, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote:
>
> > >It is Democrat corruption regardless of whether it is local or not.
>
> > Which is different or more common than Republican corruption?
>
> Corruption should be weeded out where ever it is and from which ever
> side of the political aisle it comes. The problems is that when there is
> Democrat corruption it is looked upon as boys will be boys but, when
> there is Republican corruption it is viewed as an all out attack against
> the Republic.


Why don't you ask Bill Clinton or Marion Barry or Eliot Spitzer if
they agree with that?
>
> The question of fairness always comes to mind. If you caught your
> daughter drinking beer before she was legally able to did you treat her
> any different than when you caught your son drinking been before he was
> legally able to? Does fairness dictate that you treat them both equally?
> Does family unity dictate that you treat them both equally?

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: Who else got an insurance rate hike?
Next: Tigger's Tourney