My Masters Dream Trying to Come True.................
in [Golf]
|
From: kenpitts on 10 Apr 2010 14:07 On Apr 10, 12:35 pm, "R&B" <none_of_your_busin...(a)all.com> wrote: > On 2010-04-10 11:08:10 -0400, kenpitts said: > > > > > > > On Apr 10, 9:10 am, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > >> In article <2010041010002379981-noneofyourbusiness(a)allcom>, > >> none_of_your_busin...(a)all.com says... > > >>> On 2010-04-08 18:45:17 -0400, kenpitts said: > > >>>> Fred, Watson and Mickleson at the top of the leader board, with Tiger > >>>> on the ourside looking in. Could we just take this to the back nine > >>>> Sunday? I would take any of the three as winner right now. > > >>>> Ken > > >>> Your dream come true at Augusta would be for them to replace the Green > >>> Jacket with a White Sheet. > > >>> Randy > > >> Why don't you give them yours, if you can part with it for any lenght of > >> time. > > > Brown is one of these bleeding-heart, guilt-ridden, urban, white > > liberals. He can be sympathetic for radical causes like the rabble > > that invade global economic summits but he would never (rightly so) > > show anything but disdain for the Klan. His problem is that > > conservatives like me and Laville must be marginalized and explained > > away as members of the Klan or worse. Please refer to Saul Alinsky > > here. > > No, actually, I don't believe I've ever said anything to indicate > whether I believe David is a racist. I have no reason to believe he is.. > > You, on the other hand, have made statements here in RSG that give a > pretty clear indication, starting with your 1996 diatribes about the > desirability of keeping blacks out of private country clubs and your > remarks about how Tiger Woods has only invited "the ghetto element" > into golf. > > One needn't dig too deep to find such remarks from you. > > > I wonder how, with his Democratic alliances, he works it out that > > Southern Democrats were the ones who stood in the school house doors > > and tried to block he passage of the Civil Rights Act. > > George Wallace? I don't think you'll find many Democrats who would claim him. > > Plus, it was the Republicans who turned to the "Southern Strategy" in > '68. Plus, Ronald Reagan announced his candidacy for president in the > very town where civil rights workers were killed. It is Republicans > who have opposed every "equal employment" initiative in the modern era. > And it was the Republican National Convention in 2008 that looked like > a white supremacist rally. You had to look pretty closely to spot even > one person of color on the convention hall floor. > > > Rockefeller > > Republicans pushed that over the top. > > Oh, really? And who was the president who had to make back room deals > to get it through? That would be *Democratic* President LBJ. > > Besides, Nelson Rockefeller would be run out of the Republican Party > today, and you know it. Hell, even Barry Goldwater would be considered > a flaming liberal by the standards of today's radical Republican party. > Hell, Goldwater's own descendents...and Republican President > Eisenhower's descendents -- they're all Democrats now. Why? Because > they've seen the Republican Party become a regional, racist, > reactionary, radicalized party of a diminishing number of people. > > Randy- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - One other thing. I didn't say keep blacks out of country clubs. Another distortion that you don't seem to mind making to villify me. We had a number of black members at Woodhaven. I played with several of them on a regular basis. Ask Chris Bellomy. He was a member there right along with me. But, of course, you can't be confused by the facts when it comes to attacking me. What I did post is that we (the members of Woodhaven) were subjected, as the surrounding area deteriorated, to armed robberies on the course and in the parking lot. We also had groups of young toughs roaming the course on foot and bicycle, without any regard to the notion that they were trespassing. That was finally cleaned up by bartering with the FW Police association and having armed officers in uniform patrol the course at intervals the punks could not predict in exchange for playing privileges. There were several arrests made including a punk (WHITE) who was caught pouring acid on a green to spell out profanities and another (WHITE) who was caught red-handed with gasoline and a lighter about to commit arson on the toilet structure on the back nine. I resigned from Woodhaven in 2007 when I could not take the urban blight any more. I may sign up for Trophy Club near Grapevine TX. A number of the Pigeons have lighted there. Ken
From: kenpitts on 10 Apr 2010 14:13 On Apr 10, 12:42 pm, "R&B" <none_of_your_busin...(a)all.com> wrote: > On 2010-04-10 12:47:07 -0400, Fred K. Gringioni said: > > > > > > > "kenpitts" <ken.p...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:4d3be88a-dee9-417b-8988- > > >> find the current crop of far left Democrats every bit as distasteful > >> as you find these people. But, when elected, they have every right to > >> chase after this radical agenda as we see them doing. They will pay a > >> price in November. > > > They'll pay a price in November, but not for the reason you state. > > > The reasons why they'll take a beating are: > > > 1) the party which occupies the executive branch traditionally takes a > > beating during midterm elections > > > 2) the economy sucks and the party in power also traditionally takes a > > beating when the economy sucks > > > The Democrats took a gigantic beating in 1994 and right wing ideologues > > like yourself would like to claim that it was because of Clinton's > > liberal agenda. That's not what it was. The economy sucked, the Dems > > were the party in power so they lost control of both houses of > > Congress, but the economy turned around by 1996 and Clinton go > > re-elected. > > > It's all about the economy. > > You are, of course, correct. > > However, to assume that things won't be looking up by the time the > November elections roll around is a little premature. Nobody's > predicting that the turnaround will be complete by then. But there are > improving signs even now. > > There's no issue that more unifies Americans of both parties than the > issue of Wall Street and Banking regulation. The vast majority of > Americans hate the bail-outs, and most of all, they hate that the Wall > Street douchebags keep failing and still walking away with > taxpayer-funded golden parachutes as their reward for failing. > > Republicans will likely continue to be the Grand Obstructionist Party > when the Obama Administration pushes for increased regulation and > oversight on the banking industry and Wall Street. Republicans are so > married to being the Party of No that they will likely allow their > momentum to carry them forward with a similar strategy in the fight > over banking regulation. This could prove politically suicidal, given > the overwhelmingly negative perception the people have toward the > banking industry and Wall Street. > > Don't think for a minute that won't be played up in the campaign this fall. > > And remember, in the Health Care vote, every Republican voted in favor > allowing 45,000 Americans to die each year due to having no health > insurance. Now that reform has passed and the world as we know it > hasn't ended, all the Republican lies in the lead-up to the health care > vote will finally come to light and folks will realize that reform > actually helped them. The Republicans surely won't benefit from the > truth getting out there. > > Randy- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - You seem to be excluding the fact that a number of Democrats voted against it. And others had to be threatened, bribed and intimidated into voting for it. The real bipartisan way to vote was against. If this was such a great deal, it would have passed easily last year given the majority the Dems have. Democrats think we are stupid. Ten years of tax increases for six years of services. Plus the fact that money is being taken away from Medicare when it is already going broke. The focus should always have been on fixing the mess caused by the housing crisis, not adding another "entitlement". Ken
From: dene on 10 Apr 2010 15:40 "R&B" <none_of_your_business(a)all.com> wrote in message news:2010041013350539711-noneofyourbusiness(a)allcom... > On 2010-04-10 11:08:10 -0400, kenpitts said: > > > On Apr 10, 9:10 am, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > >> In article <2010041010002379981-noneofyourbusiness(a)allcom>, > >> none_of_your_busin...(a)all.com says... > >> > >> > >> > >>> On 2010-04-08 18:45:17 -0400, kenpitts said: > >> > >>>> Fred, Watson and Mickleson at the top of the leader board, with Tiger > >>>> on the ourside looking in. Could we just take this to the back nine > >>>> Sunday? I would take any of the three as winner right now. > >> > >>>> Ken > >> > >>> Your dream come true at Augusta would be for them to replace the Green > >>> Jacket with a White Sheet. > >> > >>> Randy > >> > >> Why don't you give them yours, if you can part with it for any lenght of > >> time. > > > > Brown is one of these bleeding-heart, guilt-ridden, urban, white > > liberals. He can be sympathetic for radical causes like the rabble > > that invade global economic summits but he would never (rightly so) > > show anything but disdain for the Klan. His problem is that > > conservatives like me and Laville must be marginalized and explained > > away as members of the Klan or worse. Please refer to Saul Alinsky > > here. > > > No, actually, I don't believe I've ever said anything to indicate > whether I believe David is a racist. I have no reason to believe he is. > > You, on the other hand, have made statements here in RSG that give a > pretty clear indication, starting with your 1996 diatribes about the > desirability of keeping blacks out of private country clubs and your > remarks about how Tiger Woods has only invited "the ghetto element" > into golf. > > One needn't dig too deep to find such remarks from you. And if they exist, which is doubtful, they pale in the hateful, death-wish rhetoric that consistently spews from your pie-hole. One doesn't have to dig too deep to find how you wish damnation on all those who differ with your politics. You can point a fat finger but you have nine pointing back at you. If you were decent person, you'd cite or shut up these unprovoked attacks to Ken and others. -Greg
From: dene on 10 Apr 2010 16:14 "kenpitts" <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:57a3ea92-664b-4a24-8a83-de314578ce39(a)5g2000yqj.googlegroups.com... There are other exciting players out there besides the Cheetah. Too many people have blinders on when it comes to him. Ken ---------------------------------------------------------------- Isn't it conceivable that he's a changed man. Surely you have to be impressed with his changed attitude toward the game and fans. If this continues, then your valid reasons for criticizing him have ended. -Greg
From: kenpitts on 10 Apr 2010 17:34
On Apr 10, 3:14 pm, "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > "kenpitts" <ken.p...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:57a3ea92-664b-4a24-8a83-de314578ce39(a)5g2000yqj.googlegroups.com... > > There are other exciting players out there besides the Cheetah. Too > many people have blinders on when it comes to him. > > Ken > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Isn't it conceivable that he's a changed man. Surely you have to be > impressed with his changed attitude toward the game and fans. If this > continues, then your valid reasons for criticizing him have ended. > > -Greg Looks like he has lost control of temper and mouth again. As Vern said when Tiger blew up on #6, some things never change. Ken Ken |