From: BAR on 28 Oct 2009 21:31 In article <ee67f8c2-8140-4b89-9d37- fc6e044e05ae(a)m38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, GaGolfer2009(a)yahoo.com says... > > On Oct 28, 8:48�pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:29:28 -0400, "Frank Ketchum" > > > > <nos...(a)thanksanyway.com> wrote: > > >Why don't we solve all of the bitching right here and now? > > > > >Somebody form a second group called rec.sport.golf.19th.hole and then those > > >of use who wish to talk about golf interlaced with non-golf topics > > >(politics, current events, what I did last weekend, etc) can go there and > > >hang. > > > > >When we only want advice that will wreck our game, we can pop back in here. > > > > The problem there is getting a new newsgroup on Usenet. �So many ISPs > > are dumping Usenet, and others are cutting the ones they had to a > > minimum. �This would work as a Google Group though. �In a quick check > > I found a few golf forums there, but most are for local areas. �The > > few general golf groups are very small and hard to find. > > > > For Usenet, RSG is about it. > > > > BK > > Here is an idea. Are there not forums on the internet like www.4gea.com > or www.golfwrx.com where you can set up a forum with subfolders. For > example, subfolders like golf equipment, golf courses, and politics. > Why don't we dissolve RSG, set up a new web based group in its place, > and allow a subfolder for political or other non-golf discussions. Bulletin boards and forums suck. Too much cruft with each post.
From: Kommienezuspadt on 28 Oct 2009 21:39 "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:7ks9ckF3b5uvvU2(a)mid.individual.net... > > <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > news:o3qhe590pfngqsrf5rhjcsge7p22hl33ch(a)4ax.com... >> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:54:02 -0700 (PDT), The Hammer >> <GaGolfer2009(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>>On Oct 28, 8:48 pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: >>>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:29:28 -0400, "Frank Ketchum" >>>> >>>> <nos...(a)thanksanyway.com> wrote: >>>> >Why don't we solve all of the bitching right here and now? >>>> >>>> >Somebody form a second group called rec.sport.golf.19th.hole and then >>>> >those >>>> >of use who wish to talk about golf interlaced with non-golf topics >>>> >(politics, current events, what I did last weekend, etc) can go there >>>> >and >>>> >hang. >>>> >>>> >When we only want advice that will wreck our game, we can pop back in >>>> >here. >>>> >>>> The problem there is getting a new newsgroup on Usenet. So many ISPs >>>> are dumping Usenet, and others are cutting the ones they had to a >>>> minimum. This would work as a Google Group though. In a quick check >>>> I found a few golf forums there, but most are for local areas. The >>>> few general golf groups are very small and hard to find. >>>> >>>> For Usenet, RSG is about it. >>>> >>>> BK >>> >>>Here is an idea. Are there not forums on the internet like www.4gea.com >>>or www.golfwrx.com where you can set up a forum with subfolders. For >>>example, subfolders like golf equipment, golf courses, and politics. >>>Why don't we dissolve RSG, set up a new web based group in its place, >>>and allow a subfolder for political or other non-golf discussions. >> >> That might work, but getting people to go there would be the problem. >> >> BK > Would save me $13 at individual.net. Yes I acutally PAY to get > usenet</shame>. > > So do I - my provider dropped it. > > >
From: bknight on 28 Oct 2009 22:02 On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:39:33 -0400, "Kommienezuspadt" <NoSpam(a)NoThanks.net> wrote: > >"MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>>> >>>>Here is an idea. Are there not forums on the internet like www.4gea.com >>>>or www.golfwrx.com where you can set up a forum with subfolders. For >>>>example, subfolders like golf equipment, golf courses, and politics. >>>>Why don't we dissolve RSG, set up a new web based group in its place, >>>>and allow a subfolder for political or other non-golf discussions. >>> >>> That might work, but getting people to go there would be the problem. >>> >>> BK >> Would save me $13 at individual.net. Yes I acutally PAY to get >> usenet</shame>. >> >> > > >So do I - my provider dropped it. > Verizon? bk
From: dene on 29 Oct 2009 01:19 "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:7ks9ckF3b5uvvU2(a)mid.individual.net... > Would save me $13 at individual.net. Yes I acutally PAY to get > usenet</shame>. Me too...but it allows me to have an idiot file, which has helped me immensely with keeping RSG on the level it belongs.....entertainment. -Greg
From: dene on 29 Oct 2009 01:20 "Frank Ketchum" <nospam(a)thanksanyway.com> wrote in message news:Ej5Gm.35125$NE1.14194(a)newsfe18.iad... > Why don't we solve all of the bitching right here and now? > > Somebody form a second group called rec.sport.golf.19th.hole and then those > of use who wish to talk about golf interlaced with non-golf topics > (politics, current events, what I did last weekend, etc) can go there and > hang. > > When we only want advice that will wreck our game, we can pop back in here. Why not accept RSG for what it is? -Greg
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Insurance companies are there to help us. Yeah, right. Next: UIP STRONGLY URGED AGAINST TITPB |