From: Kommienezuspadt on 29 Oct 2009 07:49 <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message news:0tthe51ngve3r4uiglic14njopgh801s9s(a)4ax.com... > On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:39:33 -0400, "Kommienezuspadt" > <NoSpam(a)NoThanks.net> wrote: > >> >>"MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote in message > >>>>> >>>>>Here is an idea. Are there not forums on the internet like >>>>>www.4gea.com >>>>>or www.golfwrx.com where you can set up a forum with subfolders. For >>>>>example, subfolders like golf equipment, golf courses, and politics. >>>>>Why don't we dissolve RSG, set up a new web based group in its place, >>>>>and allow a subfolder for political or other non-golf discussions. >>>> >>>> That might work, but getting people to go there would be the problem. >>>> >>>> BK >>> Would save me $13 at individual.net. Yes I acutally PAY to get >>> usenet</shame>. >>> >>> >> >> >>So do I - my provider dropped it. >> > Verizon? > bk No -- locally owned phone co -- pretty much the only option here.
From: John van der Pflum on 29 Oct 2009 08:13 On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:27:45 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > ><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >news:o3qhe590pfngqsrf5rhjcsge7p22hl33ch(a)4ax.com... >> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:54:02 -0700 (PDT), The Hammer >> <GaGolfer2009(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>>On Oct 28, 8:48 pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: >>>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:29:28 -0400, "Frank Ketchum" >>>> >>>> <nos...(a)thanksanyway.com> wrote: >>>> >Why don't we solve all of the bitching right here and now? >>>> >>>> >Somebody form a second group called rec.sport.golf.19th.hole and then >>>> >those >>>> >of use who wish to talk about golf interlaced with non-golf topics >>>> >(politics, current events, what I did last weekend, etc) can go there >>>> >and >>>> >hang. >>>> >>>> >When we only want advice that will wreck our game, we can pop back in >>>> >here. >>>> >>>> The problem there is getting a new newsgroup on Usenet. So many ISPs >>>> are dumping Usenet, and others are cutting the ones they had to a >>>> minimum. This would work as a Google Group though. In a quick check >>>> I found a few golf forums there, but most are for local areas. The >>>> few general golf groups are very small and hard to find. >>>> >>>> For Usenet, RSG is about it. >>>> >>>> BK >>> >>>Here is an idea. Are there not forums on the internet like www.4gea.com >>>or www.golfwrx.com where you can set up a forum with subfolders. For >>>example, subfolders like golf equipment, golf courses, and politics. >>>Why don't we dissolve RSG, set up a new web based group in its place, >>>and allow a subfolder for political or other non-golf discussions. >> >> That might work, but getting people to go there would be the problem. >> >> BK >Would save me $13 at individual.net. Yes I acutally PAY to get >usenet</shame>. Yeah, so do I. I really don't want to go to another forum. The truth is I like the camaraderie of the folks I know [1] here and I really don't want to spend the time required to get to develop that somewhere else. [1] Granted many of them I have never met and only know by their handles. -- jvdp Hey Annika, you'll never hold these: http://www.flickr.com/photos/rockpyle/3940732311/ http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
From: MNMikeW on 29 Oct 2009 10:03 "John van der Pflum" <nowhammymyspammy(a)bite.org> wrote in message news:vj1je5d0bkqdjct9b0ma3q3ou3lkb4jm7r(a)4ax.com... > On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:27:45 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> > wrote: > >> >><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >>news:o3qhe590pfngqsrf5rhjcsge7p22hl33ch(a)4ax.com... >>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:54:02 -0700 (PDT), The Hammer >>> <GaGolfer2009(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Oct 28, 8:48 pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:29:28 -0400, "Frank Ketchum" >>>>> >>>>> <nos...(a)thanksanyway.com> wrote: >>>>> >Why don't we solve all of the bitching right here and now? >>>>> >>>>> >Somebody form a second group called rec.sport.golf.19th.hole and then >>>>> >those >>>>> >of use who wish to talk about golf interlaced with non-golf topics >>>>> >(politics, current events, what I did last weekend, etc) can go there >>>>> >and >>>>> >hang. >>>>> >>>>> >When we only want advice that will wreck our game, we can pop back in >>>>> >here. >>>>> >>>>> The problem there is getting a new newsgroup on Usenet. So many ISPs >>>>> are dumping Usenet, and others are cutting the ones they had to a >>>>> minimum. This would work as a Google Group though. In a quick check >>>>> I found a few golf forums there, but most are for local areas. The >>>>> few general golf groups are very small and hard to find. >>>>> >>>>> For Usenet, RSG is about it. >>>>> >>>>> BK >>>> >>>>Here is an idea. Are there not forums on the internet like www.4gea.com >>>>or www.golfwrx.com where you can set up a forum with subfolders. For >>>>example, subfolders like golf equipment, golf courses, and politics. >>>>Why don't we dissolve RSG, set up a new web based group in its place, >>>>and allow a subfolder for political or other non-golf discussions. >>> >>> That might work, but getting people to go there would be the problem. >>> >>> BK >>Would save me $13 at individual.net. Yes I acutally PAY to get >>usenet</shame>. > > Yeah, so do I. > > I really don't want to go to another forum. The truth is I like the > camaraderie of the folks I know [1] here and I really don't want to > spend the time required to get to develop that somewhere else. > > [1] Granted many of them I have never met and only know by their > handles. > -- Likewise John. Been hanging around this dump since 1997. :-)
From: Tom Yost on 29 Oct 2009 10:47 Horvath(a)net.net wrote: > > My provider charges extra for usenet, so I use freenews.netfront.net. > Well, here's a big fat thank you to freenews.netfront.net.
From: Frank Ketchum on 29 Oct 2009 17:57 "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote in message news:7ksj7jF3bcditU1(a)mid.individual.net... > > Why not accept RSG for what it is? > I do. I am not the one complaining about it. I am just offering a suggestion knowing full well nobody who bitches about it will lift a finger to do anything about it.
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Insurance companies are there to help us. Yeah, right. Next: UIP STRONGLY URGED AGAINST TITPB |