OK, I confess to golf heresy
in [Golf]
|
Prev: I guess I am the onl one who thinks this is aproblem.............
Next: Over Illegal immi Warfare with Mayheeko
From: bknight on 20 Jul 2010 20:02 On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:43:24 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >In article <4c462636$0$4839$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, >nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... >> >> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 07:48:11 -0400, BAR wrote: >> > In article <4c451d40$0$4859$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, >> > nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... >> >>> >> >>>> But you still can't figure out why asking me if I'd bowed to my >> >>>> Queen makes you the loser in a discussion about what constitutes >> >>>> how golf was "designed", do you? >> >>> >> >>> Just poking you with a stick about your comment about the youth of >> >>> the USA. You Canadians have only had your own country, almost, since >> >>> 1982. >> >> >> >> Well, not really. The Monarchy has had nothing to do with governing >> >> Canada for a very long time. >> > >> > Why is the Queen of England your head of state? >> >> You're certainly not shy about demonstrating your cluelessness. >> Good for you, I guess. > >My information comes from the official Canadian government sources: > >http://canada.gc.ca/aboutgov-ausujetgouv/structure-eng.html What information, that Elizabeth is Sovereign? She doesn't govern. Still swinging and missing BAR. BK
From: Moderate on 20 Jul 2010 20:13 William Clark <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote: > In article <i24uum$7l2$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > >> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message >> news:wclark2-A9E308.12334320072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >>> In article <i247us$26h$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, >>> "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message >>>> news:wclark2-430C41.20092019072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >>>>> In article <8ai92cFjdnU1(a)mid.individual.net>, >>>>> "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> We have a links course in Portland. It's ok. Bandon is a few > > > > > > hours >>>>>> as >>>>>> well. I'd play it if the price were right but I wouldn't trade > > > > > > it for >>>>>> a >>>>>> good desert course or the ones in central Oregon. I like > > > > > > beautiful >>>>>> scenery >>>>>> and being warm. My game is depressing enough without the > > > > > > addition of >>>>>> ugly >>>>>> surroundings and cold, marine air. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Greg >>>>> >>>>> No, you don't. You have a course set up to resemble a links > > > > > course, but >>>>> it is not a links course in the sense that St. Andres, Carnoustie, >>>>> Troon, Muirfield, and the rest are. That takes a couple of hundred >>>>> years, a lot of sheep, and striking natural beauty. >>>> ********************************************* >>>> >>>> How did sheep make those bunkers and that ugly ditch? That course > > > > is an >>>> eyesore. >>> >>> Sheep made the bunkers by digging holes in the sandy soil to get > > > shelter >>> from the wind. And the course os not an "eyesore" - it's > > > magnificent, if >>> you have seen it. Which, of course, you have not. >>> >>> Schooled. Again. >> >> Who knew sheep could cut and stack sod like that? > > Who knows what they were up to 200 years ago? You certainly don't - > just > like you don't know anything else. Touché, you are the queen of comebacks when your hand is shown.
From: BAR on 20 Jul 2010 20:41 In article <r5ec469ft9i3vtiob2cgolbe135ajf15of(a)4ax.com>, bknight(a)conramp.net says... > > On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:43:24 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > >In article <4c462636$0$4839$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > >nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > >> > >> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 07:48:11 -0400, BAR wrote: > >> > In article <4c451d40$0$4859$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > >> > nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > >> >>> > >> >>>> But you still can't figure out why asking me if I'd bowed to my > >> >>>> Queen makes you the loser in a discussion about what constitutes > >> >>>> how golf was "designed", do you? > >> >>> > >> >>> Just poking you with a stick about your comment about the youth of > >> >>> the USA. You Canadians have only had your own country, almost, since > >> >>> 1982. > >> >> > >> >> Well, not really. The Monarchy has had nothing to do with governing > >> >> Canada for a very long time. > >> > > >> > Why is the Queen of England your head of state? > >> > >> You're certainly not shy about demonstrating your cluelessness. > >> Good for you, I guess. > > > >My information comes from the official Canadian government sources: > > > >http://canada.gc.ca/aboutgov-ausujetgouv/structure-eng.html > > What information, that Elizabeth is Sovereign? She doesn't govern. > Still swinging and missing BAR. Youe inability to click on a link is astonishing.
From: bknight on 20 Jul 2010 21:07 On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:41:11 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >In article <r5ec469ft9i3vtiob2cgolbe135ajf15of(a)4ax.com>, >bknight(a)conramp.net says... >> >> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:43:24 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >> >> >In article <4c462636$0$4839$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, >> >nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... >> >> >> >> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 07:48:11 -0400, BAR wrote: >> >> > In article <4c451d40$0$4859$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, >> >> > nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... >> >> >>> >> >> >>>> But you still can't figure out why asking me if I'd bowed to my >> >> >>>> Queen makes you the loser in a discussion about what constitutes >> >> >>>> how golf was "designed", do you? >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Just poking you with a stick about your comment about the youth of >> >> >>> the USA. You Canadians have only had your own country, almost, since >> >> >>> 1982. >> >> >> >> >> >> Well, not really. The Monarchy has had nothing to do with governing >> >> >> Canada for a very long time. >> >> > >> >> > Why is the Queen of England your head of state? >> >> >> >> You're certainly not shy about demonstrating your cluelessness. >> >> Good for you, I guess. >> > >> >My information comes from the official Canadian government sources: >> > >> >http://canada.gc.ca/aboutgov-ausujetgouv/structure-eng.html >> >> What information, that Elizabeth is Sovereign? She doesn't govern. >> Still swinging and missing BAR. > >Youe inability to click on a link is astonishing. > England is a constitutional monarchy you fool. I went to the link, but it damned sure doesn't say that the Queen runs the country, the Prime Minister does. Here's a link that you might read...if you really can read. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_monarchy Try to learn something. BK
From: William Clark on 20 Jul 2010 21:12
In article <MPG.26aff1f3c40f126d98a13c(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <wclark2-B14019.12320320072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > > > In article <MPG.26af590bdbe273b498a138(a)news.giganews.com>, > > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > > > > In article <wclark2-2A6D08.22321219072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > > state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > > > > > Which is why the great UK links courses are mostly public. I don't > > > > > > think > > > > > > you quite get it. > > > > > > > > > > All the courses I referred to are public. Duh! > > > > > > > > > > -Greg > > > > > > > > Fine - why don't you try to walk on at Muirfield Village, or Oakmont, > > > > then? > > > > > > You really are a sore loser aren't you Billy? > > > > "Losing" what, pray? Greg's minimal subset of Oregon courses does not > > compare with the Open rotation. In any way. > > Right. Thank you. |