From: Howard Brazee on
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:52:01 -0400, William Clark
<wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote:

>> >If he were a republican, impeachment hearings would have already begun.
>>
>> For the war? For the corporate bailouts? For zealous prosecution of
>> leaks?
>>
>> Are those impeachable offenses?
>
>For being black?

Remember, if he were a Republican, impeachment would come from the
left.

--
"In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
to the legislature, and not to the executive department."

- James Madison
From: John B. on
On Jun 16, 8:55 pm, "Alan Illeman" <no...(a)nowhere.ca> wrote:
> bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 20:33:17 -0400, "Frank Ketchum"
> > <nos...(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote:
>
> >> "Alan Illeman" <no...(a)nowhere.ca> wrote in message
> >>news:B_qdnbL_q708fIXRnZ2dnUVZ_sCdnZ2d(a)supernews.com...
> >>> According to Forbes BP shares are already shaky, so
> >>> wouldn't you have thought that Obama would have had
> >>> his meeting with BP CEO Tony Hayward (and reached
> >>> an agreement) prior to the White House speech?
>
> >>> 60,000 barrels/day (3300000 US gallons; 2100000 UK
> >>> gallons; 9540000 litres) - that's a hell of a lot to clean up.
>
> >> Clearly you are confusing Obama with someone who has executive
> >> experience. Please try harder next time.
>
> > He has enough to wring $20 billion out of them.
>
> He didn't wring anything out of them, that's what they offered.

You really believe that?
From: John B. on
On Jun 16, 10:20 pm, Howard Brazee <how...(a)brazee.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:52:01 -0400, William Clark
>
> <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote:
> >> >If he were a republican, impeachment hearings would have already begun.
>
> >> For the war?   For the corporate bailouts?  For zealous prosecution of
> >> leaks?
>
> >> Are those impeachable offenses?
>
> >For being black?
>
> Remember, if he were a Republican, impeachment would come from the
> left.
>
> --
> "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
> than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
> to the legislature, and not to the executive department."
>
> - James Madison

Howard, you continue to stun me with your brilliance.
From: Bobster on

<bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
news:usti16leganvi755ftkcr32g7rjvl41k1o(a)4ax.com...
> On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:15:50 -0400, "Frank Ketchum"
> <nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote:
>
>
> Damn he has a tough job.
>
>
And he clearly isn't up to the task.


From: Bobster on

<bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
news:n8ri16dif85gtr1s8a4f1ci7iek1imealj(a)4ax.com...
> On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 20:33:17 -0400, "Frank Ketchum"
> <nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Alan Illeman" <noway(a)nowhere.ca> wrote in message
>>news:B_qdnbL_q708fIXRnZ2dnUVZ_sCdnZ2d(a)supernews.com...
>>> According to Forbes BP shares are already shaky, so
>>> wouldn't you have thought that Obama would have had
>>> his meeting with BP CEO Tony Hayward (and reached
>>> an agreement) prior to the White House speech?
>>>
>>> 60,000 barrels/day (3300000 US gallons; 2100000 UK
>>> gallons; 9540000 litres) - that's a hell of a lot to clean up.
>>
>>Clearly you are confusing Obama with someone who has executive experience.
>>Please try harder next time.
>>
> He has enough to wring $20 billion out of them.
>

Wringing money out of people is something Obama learned in Chicago.


First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Prev: If only this existed......
Next: Odds to Win the Masters