Obama - what a putz
in [Golf]
|
From: MNMikeW on 17 Jun 2010 12:37 <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message news:9mik16lftg6egbk8e2k6lvk0ur7u7uaajf(a)4ax.com... > On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:13:42 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> > wrote: > >> >><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >>news:r0ik161g4qt520n3ej3k0k37o49ivg9cjq(a)4ax.com... >>> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 10:45:49 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>BP had stated they were going to pay for all of it far before the >>>>meeting. >>>> >>> Empty rhetoric until they were pressed. >>> >>> BK >> >>BS. > > I get it. You think that BP is a fine, upstanding company that is > well-intentioned. They sure were until this happened. > > That's real BS. If they could've gotten away with paying a few > thousand bucks, that's what they would do. > >Of course you know this as fact right? No, more BS.
From: bknight on 17 Jun 2010 13:05 On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:37:36 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > ><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >news:9mik16lftg6egbk8e2k6lvk0ur7u7uaajf(a)4ax.com... >> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:13:42 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >>>news:r0ik161g4qt520n3ej3k0k37o49ivg9cjq(a)4ax.com... >>>> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 10:45:49 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>BP had stated they were going to pay for all of it far before the >>>>>meeting. >>>>> >>>> Empty rhetoric until they were pressed. >>>> >>>> BK >>> >>>BS. >> >> I get it. You think that BP is a fine, upstanding company that is >> well-intentioned. > >They sure were until this happened. You don't know what you're talking about Mike. Here is some history, which you probably won't take the time to read, so here's a quote from the Forbes article. "It's been rough few years for BP. Allegations of illegal propane trading. Massive oil spills in Alaska. A deadly explosion at a Texas refinery. All this since 2003. Such catastrophes would cripple or kill most companies". This doesn't even take into consideration the criminal charges in the past. http://alaskadispatch.com/dispatches/energy/5369-bp-still-fighting-fines-stemming-from-06-oil-spills-at-prudhoe-bay http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703399204574505034081842414.html http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7062669.stm http://www.forbes.com/2007/10/25/bp-energy-environment-biz-energy-cx_bw_1025bpfines.html >> >> That's real BS. If they could've gotten away with paying a few >> thousand bucks, that's what they would do. >> >>Of course you know this as fact right? No, more BS. > No Mike, not BS. Its their history. Take some time with google and you'll see. BK
From: bknight on 17 Jun 2010 13:13 On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:41:33 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > ><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >news:6pik1651l1qabv9uiejbk91qj68kmirp04(a)4ax.com... >> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:13:10 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >> wrote: >> >> I didn't see much hatred for Bush, only a lot of laughter. Hell, he >> wasn't the president anyway. Now there may have been hatred for >> Cheney. :-) >> >You obviously have very selective sight. > Typical broad response that doesn't mean anything Mike. Point out all of those that you remember. IMO most everyone made fun of Dubya, but I don't recall hatred. BK
From: bknight on 17 Jun 2010 13:16 On 17 Jun 2010 16:46:20 GMT, Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.comu> wrote: >"John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> I agree that the administration's response to the oil leak has been >> less than optimal. But if Obama had done everything his critics say he >> should have done, the situation in the Gulf would not be appreciably >> different from what it is now. Right-wingers have attacked him every >> which way from Tuesday, but they haven't said one harsh word about >BP, which is the guilty party. > >Sort of like blaming Bush for Katrina, but giving mother nature a free >pass. I doubt you will understand the comparison. The blame for poor response came back on Bush through his appointee to FEMA. Point out one post here that blamed him for the hurricane. You can't, but you make false accusatory statements like this all of the time BK.
From: MNMikeW on 17 Jun 2010 13:44
<bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message news:qolk16pabu7kl67jgbv95d1mvpkaiqlqb5(a)4ax.com... > On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:41:33 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> > wrote: > >> >><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >>news:6pik1651l1qabv9uiejbk91qj68kmirp04(a)4ax.com... >>> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:13:10 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> I didn't see much hatred for Bush, only a lot of laughter. Hell, he >>> wasn't the president anyway. Now there may have been hatred for >>> Cheney. :-) >>> >>You obviously have very selective sight. >> > > Typical broad response that doesn't mean anything Mike. Point out > all of those that you remember. > > IMO most everyone made fun of Dubya, but I don't recall hatred. > BK Really? Do I need to dig up some of Randys posts to refresh your memory? |