Prev: Let us endeavor....
Next: I am Kenneth Gladney
From: Carbon on 24 Mar 2010 01:03 On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:47:19 -0700, John B. wrote: > On Mar 22, 12:37 am, Jim Lovejoy <nos...(a)devnull.spam> wrote: >> "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in news:445c491e-f5de-44df-8537- >> 32b62fceb...(a)q21g2000yqm.googlegroups.com: >> >>> I did read it. Aside from the fact that the Wash Times is one of the >>> worst newspapers in the country and is about to go out of business, >>> the fact that something didn't show up on a videotape doesn't mean >>> it didn't happen. >> >> The Times about to go out of business? >> >> That's hard to believe. I'd think the Rev. Moon has plenty of money >> to keep bankrolling it as long as he wants. > > No, they're breathing their last. Good.
From: The Bogeyman on 24 Mar 2010 10:11 On Mar 23, 4:18 pm, "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 23, 3:21 pm, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mar 21, 3:34 pm, "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > The only nutjob here is you. Ah, yes, the ad hominem attack - an even more typical tactic of the looney left. Lacking the intellectual capacity to refute a point made using critical thought or facts, call the much more intelligent person with whom they disagree a name. Bravo!
From: John B. on 24 Mar 2010 10:22 On Mar 24, 10:11 am, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 23, 4:18 pm, "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mar 23, 3:21 pm, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mar 21, 3:34 pm, "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > The only nutjob here is you. > > Ah, yes, the ad hominem attack - an even more typical tactic of the > looney left. Lacking the intellectual capacity to refute a point made > using critical thought or facts, call the much more intelligent > person with whom they disagree a name. Bravo! You didn't make a point. You spewed a lot of unsubstantiated accusations about the tactics of liberals. You provided not one fact to corroborate anything you said.
From: William Clark on 24 Mar 2010 11:45 In article <926bf438-889b-40ef-bb0d-272dd691229e(a)t20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 24, 10:11�am, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mar 23, 4:18�pm, "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 23, 3:21�pm, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Mar 21, 3:34�pm, "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > The only nutjob here is you. > > > > Ah, yes, the ad hominem attack - an even more typical tactic of the > > looney left. Lacking the intellectual capacity to refute a point made > > using �critical thought or facts, call the much more intelligent > > person with whom they disagree a name. Bravo! > > You didn't make a point. You spewed a lot of unsubstantiated > accusations about the tactics of liberals. You provided not one fact > to corroborate anything you said. Well, he does claim to be "more intelligent", so that's at least one lie.
From: Carbon on 27 Mar 2010 17:13
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:43:41 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > message > news:clark-BFD3D6.12145423032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >> In article <80s004FugaU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" >> <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >>> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in >>> message >>> news:clark-26F0AD.09151323032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >>>> In article >>>> <451e2116-4df3-4719-b51f-66d4595a0304(a)19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, >>>> kenpitts <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Why are you so quick to believe Lewis and Conyers and so quick to >>>>> dismiss the story of Kenneth Gladney? >>>>> >>>>> http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/10/i-am-kenneth- >>>>> gladney/ >>>> >>>> Because it is in the Moonies' Washington Times? >>> >>> So because it appears in the Times it can't possibly be true >>> correct? >> >> Well, it will almost certainly carry their strong bias. > > Just like the New York Times. Please tell me you're joking. |