Our tea party friends
in [Golf]
|
Prev: Let us endeavor....
Next: I am Kenneth Gladney
From: Lloyd Parsons on 29 Mar 2010 11:47 In article <e986f98d-d79c-446e-b23a-e4f6f3b52ecc(a)x3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 29, 10:48�am, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > "Carbon" <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > > > > news:4bae74f0$0$5115$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:43:41 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > > >> "William Clark" <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > > >> message > > >>news:clark-BFD3D6.12145423032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > >>> In article <80s004Fug...(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" > > >>> <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > >>>> "William Clark" <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > > >>>> message > > >>>>news:clark-26F0AD.09151323032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > >>>>> In article > > >>>>> <451e2116-4df3-4719-b51f-66d4595a0...(a)19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, > > >>>>> kenpitts <ken.p...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >>>>>> Why are you so quick to believe Lewis and Conyers and so quick to > > >>>>>> dismiss the story of Kenneth Gladney? > > > > >>>>>>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/10/i-am-kenneth- > > >>>>>> gladney/ > > > > >>>>> Because it is in the Moonies' Washington Times? > > > > >>>> So because it appears in the Times it can't possibly be true > > >>>> correct? > > > > >>> Well, it will almost certainly carry their strong bias. > > > > >> Just like the New York Times. > > > > > Please tell me you're joking. > > > > The Wash. Times is no more biased than the NYT Times is.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > If not, that says something definitive about newspaper readers. The > NYT has a circulation of 928,000 and is generally considered the most > influential newspaper in the world. The Wash. Times has a circulation > of 102,000 in a metro area of 5 million. In rough percentages the NYT has about 4% and the Wash. Times has about 2% of the available population reading them. Pretty low, huh? Greater than 95% of the available population reads the paper in those two areas. I wonder if that holds in other markets as well. Pathetic! I suppose the rest get their news from the 24/7 yak-a-thons on TV!! :) -- Lloyd
From: MNMikeW on 29 Mar 2010 11:51 "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message news:clark-3BC6A4.10525329032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article <81bstnFhl5U1(a)mid.individual.net>, > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >> news:4bae74f0$0$5115$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >> > On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:43:41 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: >> >> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in >> >> message >> >> news:clark-BFD3D6.12145423032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >> >>> In article <80s004FugaU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" >> >>> <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >> >>>> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in >> >>>> message >> >>>> news:clark-26F0AD.09151323032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >> >>>>> In article >> >>>>> <451e2116-4df3-4719-b51f-66d4595a0304(a)19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, >> >>>>> kenpitts <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> Why are you so quick to believe Lewis and Conyers and so quick to >> >>>>>> dismiss the story of Kenneth Gladney? >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/10/i-am-kenneth- >> >>>>>> gladney/ >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Because it is in the Moonies' Washington Times? >> >>>> >> >>>> So because it appears in the Times it can't possibly be true >> >>>> correct? >> >>> >> >>> Well, it will almost certainly carry their strong bias. >> >> >> >> Just like the New York Times. >> > >> > Please tell me you're joking. >> >> The Wash. Times is no more biased than the NYT Times is. > > Christ on a bike. I see your bias and raise you.
From: MNMikeW on 29 Mar 2010 11:54 "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:e986f98d-d79c-446e-b23a-e4f6f3b52ecc(a)x3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com... On Mar 29, 10:48 am, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > "Carbon" <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > > news:4bae74f0$0$5115$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > > > > > > > On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:43:41 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > >> "William Clark" <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > >> message > >>news:clark-BFD3D6.12145423032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > >>> In article <80s004Fug...(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" > >>> <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > >>>> "William Clark" <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > >>>> message > >>>>news:clark-26F0AD.09151323032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > >>>>> In article > >>>>> <451e2116-4df3-4719-b51f-66d4595a0...(a)19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, > >>>>> kenpitts <ken.p...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>>> Why are you so quick to believe Lewis and Conyers and so quick to > >>>>>> dismiss the story of Kenneth Gladney? > > >>>>>>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/10/i-am-kenneth- > >>>>>> gladney/ > > >>>>> Because it is in the Moonies' Washington Times? > > >>>> So because it appears in the Times it can't possibly be true > >>>> correct? > > >>> Well, it will almost certainly carry their strong bias. > > >> Just like the New York Times. > > > Please tell me you're joking. > > The Wash. Times is no more biased than the NYT Times is.- Hide quoted > text - > > - Show quoted text - If not, that says something definitive about newspaper readers. The NYT has a circulation of 928,000 and is generally considered the most influential newspaper in the world. The Wash. Times has a circulation of 102,000 in a metro area of 5 million. ================================= Circulation has nothing to do with bias.
From: John B. on 29 Mar 2010 13:27 On Mar 29, 11:54 am, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:e986f98d-d79c-446e-b23a-e4f6f3b52ecc(a)x3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com... > On Mar 29, 10:48 am, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > "Carbon" <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > > >news:4bae74f0$0$5115$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > > > > On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:43:41 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > > >> "William Clark" <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > > >> message > > >>news:clark-BFD3D6.12145423032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > >>> In article <80s004Fug...(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" > > >>> <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > >>>> "William Clark" <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > > >>>> message > > >>>>news:clark-26F0AD.09151323032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > >>>>> In article > > >>>>> <451e2116-4df3-4719-b51f-66d4595a0...(a)19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, > > >>>>> kenpitts <ken.p...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>>>>> Why are you so quick to believe Lewis and Conyers and so quick to > > >>>>>> dismiss the story of Kenneth Gladney? > > > >>>>>>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/10/i-am-kenneth- > > >>>>>> gladney/ > > > >>>>> Because it is in the Moonies' Washington Times? > > > >>>> So because it appears in the Times it can't possibly be true > > >>>> correct? > > > >>> Well, it will almost certainly carry their strong bias. > > > >> Just like the New York Times. > > > > Please tell me you're joking. > > > The Wash. Times is no more biased than the NYT Times is.- Hide quoted > > text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > If not, that says something definitive about newspaper readers. The > NYT has a circulation of 928,000 and is generally considered the most > influential newspaper in the world. The Wash. Times has a circulation > of 102,000 in a metro area of 5 million. > ================================= > Circulation has nothing to do with bias.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - So perceived bias has nothing to do with people's decisions to buy or not buy a particular paper?
From: MNMikeW on 29 Mar 2010 13:41
"John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:adb22dfa-cb60-471d-8377-d40d6043c7f0(a)q15g2000yqj.googlegroups.com... On Mar 29, 11:54 am, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:e986f98d-d79c-446e-b23a-e4f6f3b52ecc(a)x3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com... > On Mar 29, 10:48 am, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > "Carbon" <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > > >news:4bae74f0$0$5115$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > > > > On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:43:41 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > > >> "William Clark" <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > > >> message > > >>news:clark-BFD3D6.12145423032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > >>> In article <80s004Fug...(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" > > >>> <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > >>>> "William Clark" <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > > >>>> message > > >>>>news:clark-26F0AD.09151323032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > >>>>> In article > > >>>>> <451e2116-4df3-4719-b51f-66d4595a0...(a)19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, > > >>>>> kenpitts <ken.p...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>>>>> Why are you so quick to believe Lewis and Conyers and so quick to > > >>>>>> dismiss the story of Kenneth Gladney? > > > >>>>>>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/10/i-am-kenneth- > > >>>>>> gladney/ > > > >>>>> Because it is in the Moonies' Washington Times? > > > >>>> So because it appears in the Times it can't possibly be true > > >>>> correct? > > > >>> Well, it will almost certainly carry their strong bias. > > > >> Just like the New York Times. > > > > Please tell me you're joking. > > > The Wash. Times is no more biased than the NYT Times is.- Hide quoted > > text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > If not, that says something definitive about newspaper readers. The > NYT has a circulation of 928,000 and is generally considered the most > influential newspaper in the world. The Wash. Times has a circulation > of 102,000 in a metro area of 5 million. > ================================= > Circulation has nothing to do with bias.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - So perceived bias has nothing to do with people's decisions to buy or not buy a particular paper? ================================ Not always. The Mpls Star Trib is very left biased, I still get it. |