Our tea party friends
in [Golf]
|
Prev: Let us endeavor....
Next: I am Kenneth Gladney
From: William Clark on 29 Mar 2010 14:16 In article <81c0kmFa8jU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > news:clark-3BC6A4.10525329032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > In article <81bstnFhl5U1(a)mid.individual.net>, > > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > >> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > >> news:4bae74f0$0$5115$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > >> > On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:43:41 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > >> >> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > >> >> message > >> >> news:clark-BFD3D6.12145423032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > >> >>> In article <80s004FugaU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" > >> >>> <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> >>>> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > >> >>>> message > >> >>>> news:clark-26F0AD.09151323032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > >> >>>>> In article > >> >>>>> <451e2116-4df3-4719-b51f-66d4595a0304(a)19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, > >> >>>>> kenpitts <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>>> Why are you so quick to believe Lewis and Conyers and so quick to > >> >>>>>> dismiss the story of Kenneth Gladney? > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/10/i-am-kenneth- > >> >>>>>> gladney/ > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Because it is in the Moonies' Washington Times? > >> >>>> > >> >>>> So because it appears in the Times it can't possibly be true > >> >>>> correct? > >> >>> > >> >>> Well, it will almost certainly carry their strong bias. > >> >> > >> >> Just like the New York Times. > >> > > >> > Please tell me you're joking. > >> > >> The Wash. Times is no more biased than the NYT Times is. > > > > Christ on a bike. > > I see your bias and raise you. You can't raise your bias any higher.
From: William Clark on 29 Mar 2010 14:16 In article <81bt7sFjh6U1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > news:clark-C3CD65.11245528032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > In article <4bae74f0$0$5115$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > > Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:43:41 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > >> > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > >> > message > >> > news:clark-BFD3D6.12145423032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > >> >> In article <80s004FugaU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" > >> >> <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> >>> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > >> >>> message > >> >>> news:clark-26F0AD.09151323032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > >> >>>> In article > >> >>>> <451e2116-4df3-4719-b51f-66d4595a0304(a)19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, > >> >>>> kenpitts <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>>> Why are you so quick to believe Lewis and Conyers and so quick to > >> >>>>> dismiss the story of Kenneth Gladney? > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/10/i-am-kenneth- > >> >>>>> gladney/ > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Because it is in the Moonies' Washington Times? > >> >>> > >> >>> So because it appears in the Times it can't possibly be true > >> >>> correct? > >> >> > >> >> Well, it will almost certainly carry their strong bias. > >> > > >> > Just like the New York Times. > >> > >> Please tell me you're joking. > > > > He can't - he has absolutely no sense of humor. > > What ever you say Mr Kettle. Oh, he has no originality, either.
From: MNMikeW on 29 Mar 2010 14:59 "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message news:clark-DA5732.14162029032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article <81c0kmFa8jU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message >> news:clark-3BC6A4.10525329032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >> > In article <81bstnFhl5U1(a)mid.individual.net>, >> > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >> > >> >> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >> >> news:4bae74f0$0$5115$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >> >> > On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:43:41 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: >> >> >> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in >> >> >> message >> >> >> news:clark-BFD3D6.12145423032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >> >> >>> In article <80s004FugaU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" >> >> >>> <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >> >> >>>> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in >> >> >>>> message >> >> >>>> news:clark-26F0AD.09151323032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >> >> >>>>> In article >> >> >>>>> <451e2116-4df3-4719-b51f-66d4595a0304(a)19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, >> >> >>>>> kenpitts <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>> Why are you so quick to believe Lewis and Conyers and so quick >> >> >>>>>> to >> >> >>>>>> dismiss the story of Kenneth Gladney? >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/10/i-am-kenneth- >> >> >>>>>> gladney/ >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> Because it is in the Moonies' Washington Times? >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> So because it appears in the Times it can't possibly be true >> >> >>>> correct? >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Well, it will almost certainly carry their strong bias. >> >> >> >> >> >> Just like the New York Times. >> >> > >> >> > Please tell me you're joking. >> >> >> >> The Wash. Times is no more biased than the NYT Times is. >> > >> > Christ on a bike. >> >> I see your bias and raise you. > > You can't raise your bias any higher. You are the KING of bias.
From: William Clark on 29 Mar 2010 15:09 In article <81cblaFh7pU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > news:clark-DA5732.14162029032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > In article <81c0kmFa8jU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > >> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > >> news:clark-3BC6A4.10525329032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > >> > In article <81bstnFhl5U1(a)mid.individual.net>, > >> > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > >> >> news:4bae74f0$0$5115$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > >> >> > On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:43:41 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > >> >> >> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > >> >> >> message > >> >> >> news:clark-BFD3D6.12145423032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > >> >> >>> In article <80s004FugaU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" > >> >> >>> <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> >> >>>> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > >> >> >>>> message > >> >> >>>> news:clark-26F0AD.09151323032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > >> >> >>>>> In article > >> >> >>>>> <451e2116-4df3-4719-b51f-66d4595a0304(a)19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com> > >> >> >>>>> , > >> >> >>>>> kenpitts <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>>>> Why are you so quick to believe Lewis and Conyers and so quick > >> >> >>>>>> to > >> >> >>>>>> dismiss the story of Kenneth Gladney? > >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>> http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/10/i-am-kenneth- > >> >> >>>>>> gladney/ > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>>> Because it is in the Moonies' Washington Times? > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> So because it appears in the Times it can't possibly be true > >> >> >>>> correct? > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> Well, it will almost certainly carry their strong bias. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Just like the New York Times. > >> >> > > >> >> > Please tell me you're joking. > >> >> > >> >> The Wash. Times is no more biased than the NYT Times is. > >> > > >> > Christ on a bike. > >> > >> I see your bias and raise you. > > > > You can't raise your bias any higher. > > You are the KING of bias. In your completely unbiased opinion, of course. Right.
From: Moderate on 29 Mar 2010 15:23
"William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message news:clark-DA5732.14162029032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article <81c0kmFa8jU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >> >> I see your bias and raise you. > > You can't raise your bias any higher. Sorry Mike, you lose. Playing no limit, you didn't bring enough of a stake to the table to out bet Clark. |