Our tea party friends
in [Golf]
|
Prev: Let us endeavor....
Next: I am Kenneth Gladney
From: bknight on 30 Mar 2010 11:45 On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:18:46 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >"John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >The NYT is a liberal paper, but I don't often see its liberalism >spilling onto its news pages. I have seen that with the Wahsington >Post, especially when Bush was president. The Wash. Times is a >conservative paper whose right-wing bias does spill over onto its news >pages, and the Times editors even admit it. The whole reason the paper >was founded was to provide a conservative alternative to the Wash. >Post. The WT will be out of business in a few months. > >======================================== >As will most newspapers. Well, until Obama bails them out too. > Maybe that will turn out to be as profitable for the country as the Citibank bailout. $7.5 billion profit ain't bad for a year and a half. BK
From: John B. on 30 Mar 2010 11:46 On Mar 30, 11:18 am, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:dce8108f-afc8-4e5f-b0fd-990bc1970504(a)k13g2000yqe.googlegroups.com... > On Mar 29, 6:35 pm, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > "Carbon" <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > > >news:4bb12852$0$4986$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > > > > On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:48:22 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > > >> "Carbon" <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > > >>news:4bae74f0$0$5115$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > > >>> On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:43:41 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > > >>>> "William Clark" <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > > >>>> message > > >>>>news:clark-BFD3D6.12145423032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > >>>>> In article <80s004Fug...(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" > > >>>>> <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > >>>>>> "William Clark" <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > > >>>>>> message > > >>>>>>news:clark-26F0AD.09151323032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu.... > > >>>>>>> In article > > >>>>>>> <451e2116-4df3-4719-b51f-66d4595a0...(a)19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, > > >>>>>>> kenpitts <ken.p...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> Why are you so quick to believe Lewis and Conyers and so quick to > > >>>>>>>> dismiss the story of Kenneth Gladney? > > > >>>>>>>>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/10/i-am-kenneth- > > >>>>>>>> gladney/ > > > >>>>>>> Because it is in the Moonies' Washington Times? > > > >>>>>> So because it appears in the Times it can't possibly be true > > >>>>>> correct? > > > >>>>> Well, it will almost certainly carry their strong bias. > > > >>>> Just like the New York Times. > > > >>> Please tell me you're joking. > > > >> The Wash. Times is no more biased than the NYT Times is. > > > > Are you insane? > > > Do you actually believe the NYT is not biased?- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > The NYT is a liberal paper, but I don't often see its liberalism > spilling onto its news pages. I have seen that with the Wahsington > Post, especially when Bush was president. The Wash. Times is a > conservative paper whose right-wing bias does spill over onto its news > pages, and the Times editors even admit it. The whole reason the paper > was founded was to provide a conservative alternative to the Wash. > Post. The WT will be out of business in a few months. > > ======================================== > As will most newspapers. Well, until Obama bails them out too.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Most newspapers will die out eventually. The Wash. Times is in particularly bad shape. It cancelled its Sunday edition and laid off most of its staff.
From: bknight on 30 Mar 2010 11:54 On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:45:43 -0400, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote: >On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:27:33 -0700 (PDT), "John B." ><johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>So perceived bias has nothing to do with people's decisions to buy or >>not buy a particular paper? > >Of course it does. People usually buy a newspaper that agrees with >their political point of view. Attn: Jack, this was a response questioning a statement by Mike that read: " Circulation has nothing to do with bias". You made John's point for him. BK
From: MNMikeW on 30 Mar 2010 12:35 "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:6f5c6c39-3ff5-442b-bcd7-4d2ba11189d2(a)u31g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... On Mar 30, 11:18 am, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:dce8108f-afc8-4e5f-b0fd-990bc1970504(a)k13g2000yqe.googlegroups.com... > On Mar 29, 6:35 pm, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > "Carbon" <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > > >news:4bb12852$0$4986$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > > > > On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:48:22 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > > >> "Carbon" <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > > >>news:4bae74f0$0$5115$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > > >>> On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:43:41 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > > >>>> "William Clark" <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > > >>>> message > > >>>>news:clark-BFD3D6.12145423032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > >>>>> In article <80s004Fug...(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" > > >>>>> <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > >>>>>> "William Clark" <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > > >>>>>> message > > >>>>>>news:clark-26F0AD.09151323032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > >>>>>>> In article > > >>>>>>> <451e2116-4df3-4719-b51f-66d4595a0...(a)19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, > > >>>>>>> kenpitts <ken.p...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> Why are you so quick to believe Lewis and Conyers and so quick > > >>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>> dismiss the story of Kenneth Gladney? > > > >>>>>>>>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/10/i-am-kenneth- > > >>>>>>>> gladney/ > > > >>>>>>> Because it is in the Moonies' Washington Times? > > > >>>>>> So because it appears in the Times it can't possibly be true > > >>>>>> correct? > > > >>>>> Well, it will almost certainly carry their strong bias. > > > >>>> Just like the New York Times. > > > >>> Please tell me you're joking. > > > >> The Wash. Times is no more biased than the NYT Times is. > > > > Are you insane? > > > Do you actually believe the NYT is not biased?- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > The NYT is a liberal paper, but I don't often see its liberalism > spilling onto its news pages. I have seen that with the Wahsington > Post, especially when Bush was president. The Wash. Times is a > conservative paper whose right-wing bias does spill over onto its news > pages, and the Times editors even admit it. The whole reason the paper > was founded was to provide a conservative alternative to the Wash. > Post. The WT will be out of business in a few months. > > ======================================== > As will most newspapers. Well, until Obama bails them out too.- Hide > quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Most newspapers will die out eventually. The Wash. Times is in particularly bad shape. It cancelled its Sunday edition and laid off most of its staff. ==================================== Only the strong will survive. So be it.
From: Dinosaur_Sr on 30 Mar 2010 12:53
On Mar 30, 10:34 am, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:35:26 -0700 (PDT), Dinosaur_Sr > > <frostb...(a)dukesofbiohazard.com> wrote: > >On Mar 29, 7:06 pm, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:35:57 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > >> Your claim was that the NYT was as biased as the Washington Times, a > >> cult rag and an embarrassment to journalism. > > >I would have never thought a person like you would recognize that the > >NYT is a cult rag that is an embarassment to journalism. > > He didn't. Although a semi-colon would've helped,does one have to > point out that he was describing the Washington Times to you? > Otherwise it was a poor reading by you, or a poor attempt at > diversion. > BK Both papers are cult rags, IMHO. One makes no claims to have all the news that's fit to print though, which is pretty braggadocios for a rag that would have to rise to come to the level of a supermarket tabloid. |