From: MNMikeW on

"Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:4bb41549$0$4873$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:10:16 -0500, MNMikeW wrote:
>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
>> news:4bb27cb1$0$4875$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>>> On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:17:33 -0500, MNMikeW wrote:
>>>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:4bb1327c$0$27202$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>>>>> On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:35:57 -0500, MNMikeW wrote:
>>>>>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:4bb12852$0$4986$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>>>>>>> On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:48:22 -0500, MNMikeW wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:4bae74f0$0$5115$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:43:41 -0500, MNMikeW wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote
>>>>>>>>>> in message
>>>>>>>>>> news:clark-BFD3D6.12145423032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-
>>>>>>>>>> state.edu...
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <80s004FugaU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW"
>>>>>>>>>>> <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>> in message
>>>>>>>>>>>> news:clark-26F0AD.09151323032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-
>>>>>>>>>>>> state.edu...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <451e2116-4df3-4719-
>>>>>>>>>>>>> b51f-66d4595a0304(a)19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, kenpitts
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why are you so quick to believe Lewis and Conyers and so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quick to dismiss the story of Kenneth Gladney?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/10/i-am-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kenneth-gladney/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it is in the Moonies' Washington Times?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So because it appears in the Times it can't possibly be true
>>>>>>>>>>>> correct?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Well, it will almost certainly carry their strong bias.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Just like the New York Times.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please tell me you're joking.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The Wash. Times is no more biased than the NYT Times is.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you insane?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you actually believe the NYT is not biased?
>>>>>
>>>>> Your claim was that the NYT was as biased as the Washington Times,
>>>>> a cult rag and an embarrassment to journalism.
>>>>
>>>> That would be your biased opinion of course.
>>>
>>> To save yourself future embarrassment: find a copy of the NY Times,
>>> then find a copy of the Washington Times (if you can). Read them
>>> both. I am assuming you're not so stupid that you can't spot the
>>> obvious difference in quality between the two.
>>
>> One mans trash.....
>
> I had no idea you were such a relativist. To me, and aside from any
> alleged bias, decent writing and analysis are worth something. In those
> respects the NY Times is one of the best newspapers in the world. The
> editorials sometimes have a liberal slant, but they are clearly marked
> as editorials. They're not trying to trick anybody.

Sometimes? But like my Star Trib here, their liberalism often bleeds over
into their
regular news.
>
> You're probably already crafting some snide one-liner, but let me ask
> you: how much do you know about the NYT? How much have you read it?
> My guess on both would be: very little.

I used to read it online till they went pay subscription.


From: assimilate on

On 28-Mar-2010, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote:

> > If this happened at all, why didn't any of the many videos shot of
> > this procession capture it? Would Congressmen or their staff lie? say
> > it ain't so!
>
> Have you seen signs some of these people carry? It's not like what's
> alleged to have happened is totally inconceivable.

That's not the issue: did it happen? If it did, why did none of the
recording devices pick it up? You level accusations, you need to back them
up!

--
bill-o
From: assimilate on

On 29-Mar-2010, William Clark <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote:

> >
> > The Wash. Times is no more biased than the NYT Times is.
>
> Christ on a bike.

Are you trying to claim the NYT isn't biased?

--
bill-o
From: Carbon on
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 14:22:40 +0000, assimilate wrote:
> On 28-Mar-2010, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>
>>> If this happened at all, why didn't any of the many videos shot of
>>> this procession capture it? Would Congressmen or their staff lie? say
>>> it ain't so!
>>
>> Have you seen signs some of these people carry? It's not like what's
>> alleged to have happened is totally inconceivable.
>
> That's not the issue: did it happen? If it did, why did none of the
> recording devices pick it up? You level accusations, you need to back
> them up!

I leveled no accusations, because like you I do not know what really
happened. Not that it stopped you from claiming the whole thing was
staged. How could you possibly know that?
From: kenpitts on
On Apr 4, 9:22 am, assimil...(a)borg.org wrote:
> On 28-Mar-2010, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>
> > > If this happened at all, why didn't any of the many videos shot of
> > > this procession capture it? Would Congressmen or their staff lie? say
> > > it ain't so!
>
> > Have you seen signs some of these people carry? It's not like what's
> > alleged to have happened is totally inconceivable.

Here are a lot of photos from the Sept 12 gathering of last year.
Peaceful, no arrests, no problems. As opposed to radical leftists and
their destruction at aconomic summits.

http://www.lookingattheleft.com/2009/09/conservative-woodstock-rocks-the-capital/

Ken
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
Prev: Let us endeavor....
Next: I am Kenneth Gladney