Prev: Let us endeavor....
Next: I am Kenneth Gladney
From: MNMikeW on 1 Apr 2010 11:09 "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message news:4bb41549$0$4873$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:10:16 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: >> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >> news:4bb27cb1$0$4875$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >>> On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:17:33 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: >>>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >>>> news:4bb1327c$0$27202$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >>>>> On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:35:57 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: >>>>>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:4bb12852$0$4986$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >>>>>>> On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:48:22 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: >>>>>>>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:4bae74f0$0$5115$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:43:41 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: >>>>>>>>>> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote >>>>>>>>>> in message >>>>>>>>>> news:clark-BFD3D6.12145423032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- >>>>>>>>>> state.edu... >>>>>>>>>>> In article <80s004FugaU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" >>>>>>>>>>> <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>> in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:clark-26F0AD.09151323032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- >>>>>>>>>>>> state.edu... >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <451e2116-4df3-4719- >>>>>>>>>>>>> b51f-66d4595a0304(a)19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, kenpitts >>>>>>>>>>>>> <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why are you so quick to believe Lewis and Conyers and so >>>>>>>>>>>>>> quick to dismiss the story of Kenneth Gladney? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/10/i-am- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> kenneth-gladney/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it is in the Moonies' Washington Times? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> So because it appears in the Times it can't possibly be true >>>>>>>>>>>> correct? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Well, it will almost certainly carry their strong bias. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Just like the New York Times. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Please tell me you're joking. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The Wash. Times is no more biased than the NYT Times is. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Are you insane? >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you actually believe the NYT is not biased? >>>>> >>>>> Your claim was that the NYT was as biased as the Washington Times, >>>>> a cult rag and an embarrassment to journalism. >>>> >>>> That would be your biased opinion of course. >>> >>> To save yourself future embarrassment: find a copy of the NY Times, >>> then find a copy of the Washington Times (if you can). Read them >>> both. I am assuming you're not so stupid that you can't spot the >>> obvious difference in quality between the two. >> >> One mans trash..... > > I had no idea you were such a relativist. To me, and aside from any > alleged bias, decent writing and analysis are worth something. In those > respects the NY Times is one of the best newspapers in the world. The > editorials sometimes have a liberal slant, but they are clearly marked > as editorials. They're not trying to trick anybody. Sometimes? But like my Star Trib here, their liberalism often bleeds over into their regular news. > > You're probably already crafting some snide one-liner, but let me ask > you: how much do you know about the NYT? How much have you read it? > My guess on both would be: very little. I used to read it online till they went pay subscription.
From: assimilate on 4 Apr 2010 10:22 On 28-Mar-2010, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > > If this happened at all, why didn't any of the many videos shot of > > this procession capture it? Would Congressmen or their staff lie? say > > it ain't so! > > Have you seen signs some of these people carry? It's not like what's > alleged to have happened is totally inconceivable. That's not the issue: did it happen? If it did, why did none of the recording devices pick it up? You level accusations, you need to back them up! -- bill-o
From: assimilate on 4 Apr 2010 10:25 On 29-Mar-2010, William Clark <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote: > > > > The Wash. Times is no more biased than the NYT Times is. > > Christ on a bike. Are you trying to claim the NYT isn't biased? -- bill-o
From: Carbon on 4 Apr 2010 12:30 On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 14:22:40 +0000, assimilate wrote: > On 28-Mar-2010, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > >>> If this happened at all, why didn't any of the many videos shot of >>> this procession capture it? Would Congressmen or their staff lie? say >>> it ain't so! >> >> Have you seen signs some of these people carry? It's not like what's >> alleged to have happened is totally inconceivable. > > That's not the issue: did it happen? If it did, why did none of the > recording devices pick it up? You level accusations, you need to back > them up! I leveled no accusations, because like you I do not know what really happened. Not that it stopped you from claiming the whole thing was staged. How could you possibly know that?
From: kenpitts on 4 Apr 2010 13:44
On Apr 4, 9:22 am, assimil...(a)borg.org wrote: > On 28-Mar-2010, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > > > > If this happened at all, why didn't any of the many videos shot of > > > this procession capture it? Would Congressmen or their staff lie? say > > > it ain't so! > > > Have you seen signs some of these people carry? It's not like what's > > alleged to have happened is totally inconceivable. Here are a lot of photos from the Sept 12 gathering of last year. Peaceful, no arrests, no problems. As opposed to radical leftists and their destruction at aconomic summits. http://www.lookingattheleft.com/2009/09/conservative-woodstock-rocks-the-capital/ Ken |