Our tea party friends
in [Golf]
|
Prev: Let us endeavor....
Next: I am Kenneth Gladney
From: Moderate on 7 Apr 2010 14:19 "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message news:clark-295E79.14094307042010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article > <a6a86504-f5cf-49ac-a9dc-60af6a673207(a)30g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, > Dinosaur_Sr <frostback(a)dukesofbiohazard.com> wrote: > >> On Apr 7, 7:50 am, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- >> state.edu> wrote: >> >> > >> > I think yu have nailed it right there - "incapable of rational thought" >> > does it for me. >> >> It hasn't worked well for you so far though. You might want to give >> rational thought a try. Mindless subservience to ideology has reduced >> you to fool status. > > Perhaps, but I am al least bright enough to know that there is no such > thing as an "x-ray crystallograph". 15-0. That does not make you less of a fool.
From: MNMikeW on 7 Apr 2010 14:31 "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message news:clark-78112E.14084207042010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article > <576e9a46-6587-4a6a-8e29-d9f5a33f4c6a(a)r27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>, > Dinosaur_Sr <frostback(a)dukesofbiohazard.com> wrote: > >> On Apr 6, 10:46 pm, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >> > On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 07:51:39 +0000, assimilate wrote: >> > > On 4-Apr-2010, William Clark <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote: >> > >> > >>> Are you trying to claim the NYT isn't biased? >> > >> > >> Compared to the Washington Times? Get real. >> > >> > > the only difference is the NYT is biased in the same way that you are >> > >> > Everybody is biased. It's the degree of bias that matters. You would >> > have to be incapable of rational thought to seriously equate a cult rag >> > like the Wash Times to the NYT. >> >> The NYT, like the Wash Times, is deliberately biased. The bias is a >> matter of policy, and both are extreme to my minds eye. I don't see a >> difference. > > Where would you say the political bias of David Brooks lies? Thank you. So using your logic. Fox is not biased because Alan Colmes is on it.
From: MNMikeW on 7 Apr 2010 14:32 "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message news:clark-295E79.14094307042010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article > <a6a86504-f5cf-49ac-a9dc-60af6a673207(a)30g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, > Dinosaur_Sr <frostback(a)dukesofbiohazard.com> wrote: > >> On Apr 7, 7:50 am, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- >> state.edu> wrote: >> >> > >> > I think yu have nailed it right there - "incapable of rational thought" >> > does it for me. >> >> It hasn't worked well for you so far though. You might want to give >> rational thought a try. Mindless subservience to ideology has reduced >> you to fool status. > > Perhaps, but I am al least bright enough to know that there is no such > thing as an "x-ray crystallograph". 15-0. The Artful Dodger strikes again!
From: William Clark on 7 Apr 2010 16:42 In article <8241c9Ft2lU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > news:clark-78112E.14084207042010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > In article > > <576e9a46-6587-4a6a-8e29-d9f5a33f4c6a(a)r27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>, > > Dinosaur_Sr <frostback(a)dukesofbiohazard.com> wrote: > > > >> On Apr 6, 10:46 pm, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > >> > On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 07:51:39 +0000, assimilate wrote: > >> > > On 4-Apr-2010, William Clark <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > >>> Are you trying to claim the NYT isn't biased? > >> > > >> > >> Compared to the Washington Times? Get real. > >> > > >> > > the only difference is the NYT is biased in the same way that you are > >> > > >> > Everybody is biased. It's the degree of bias that matters. You would > >> > have to be incapable of rational thought to seriously equate a cult rag > >> > like the Wash Times to the NYT. > >> > >> The NYT, like the Wash Times, is deliberately biased. The bias is a > >> matter of policy, and both are extreme to my minds eye. I don't see a > >> difference. > > > > Where would you say the political bias of David Brooks lies? Thank you. > > So using your logic. Fox is not biased because Alan Colmes is on it. No, Fox News is entertainment TV, not a serious news channel.
From: William Clark on 7 Apr 2010 16:42
In article <8241duFtd7U1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > news:clark-295E79.14094307042010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > In article > > <a6a86504-f5cf-49ac-a9dc-60af6a673207(a)30g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, > > Dinosaur_Sr <frostback(a)dukesofbiohazard.com> wrote: > > > >> On Apr 7, 7:50 am, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- > >> state.edu> wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > I think yu have nailed it right there - "incapable of rational thought" > >> > does it for me. > >> > >> It hasn't worked well for you so far though. You might want to give > >> rational thought a try. Mindless subservience to ideology has reduced > >> you to fool status. > > > > Perhaps, but I am al least bright enough to know that there is no such > > thing as an "x-ray crystallograph". 15-0. > > The Artful Dodger strikes again! Nothing to dodge, actually. |