Palin's Book Being Sold "AT BELOW COST" Prices
in [Golf]
|
Prev: Palin's book on top at amazon
Next: Was Pitts right?
From: dene on 23 Nov 2009 02:12 "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message news:wclark2-890C9C.11365722112009(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > How is a first term governor a "'lame duck"? > > > > > > Please explain. > > > > You can't figure that out yourself. Put on the thinking cap Billy. It appears he can't. > Ok, so you can't explain it either. In that case, you would be better > keeping quiet and not looking so dumb in public. > > So, once again, how is a first term governor, not halfway through her > term, a "lame duck"? The first two years of a governor and legislation is focussed on passing bills. The 2nd two years are focussed on re-election, hence the term lame duck. > Oh, and being attracted to the limelight, and big money book deals are > not answers to this one. She's in debt to the tune of 500k, primarily due to witch hunt legal and ethic actions against her. Why is it irresponsible for her, as a capitalist, to repay it and secure her family's finances. Bill Clinton wrote a horrible book to help pay his debt from WhiteWater. -Greg
From: dene on 23 Nov 2009 02:13 <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message news:0ljeg5lfe9u1ph66b38clb8s8eqi21r1bq(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:48:40 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > >In article <1iheg5961nckpmu5jf5rme6aqv79cho1ae(a)4ax.com>, > >bknight(a)conramp.net says... > >> > >> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:39:24 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > >> > >> >In article <4b0738d2$0$4949$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > >> >nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > >> > >> >> You guys on the right need to forget about Palin. She is a polarizing > >> >> personality and does not have enough supporters to win a national > >> >> election. It. will. never. happen. And if by some miracle she does get > >> >> the nomination in 2012 Obama will drive her into the ground. Greg, you > >> >> need to be pragmatic about this. If you guys lose any more ground you > >> >> will have no say at all in shaping policy. > >> >> > >> >> I'm as liberal as all get-out and even I don't want a one-party system, > >> >> Democrat or otherwise. > >> > > >> >If Palin wins in 2012 will you leave the country and go live in France? > >> > > >> You're pretty sure of yourself. What will be your penance if she > >> doesn't get the nomination, or if she does and then loses the > >> election? > > > >My pennance will be to suffer thru another 4 years of an idiot running > >the country. > > > >What are you willing to do? > > Enjoy it immensely. > > bk That means you're impressed with Obama's year so far. LOL! -Greg
From: dene on 23 Nov 2009 02:19 "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message news:4b0738d2$0$4949$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:00:29 -0800, dene wrote: > > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > > news:4b05ee24$0$4967$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > >> On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:42:28 -0700, Howard Brazee wrote: > >> > >>> She's popular. > >>> > >>> But so is Paris Hilton. > >> > >> Only not as smart. > > > > Yeah....she's a dummy. Housewife to city councilman, mayor, governor > > and yet, in your eyes, she's dumb. > > > > You ought to consider switching the channels once in a while, Carbs. > > Round 1 was with O'Reilly and she did fine. Reason.....she's learning > > how the game is played. If she was dumb, she'd be making the same > > gaffe's. > > > > Round 2 is tomorrow. > > You guys on the right need to forget about Palin. She is a polarizing > personality and does not have enough supporters to win a national > election. It. will. never. happen. And if by some miracle she does get > the nomination in 2012 Obama will drive her into the ground. Greg, you > need to be pragmatic about this. If you guys lose any more ground you > will have no say at all in shaping policy. I'm not advocating her to be President in 2012. What I'm advocating is that she deserves some respect for the growth she's displayed thus far that's manifesting itself in the recent interviews, especially O'Reilly's. This "dumb barbie" speal is as ridiculous as left calling Bush I a "wimp." Funny thing...nobody called him that after Desert Storm. > I'm as liberal as all get-out and even I don't want a one-party system, > Democrat or otherwise. Amen. -Greg
From: dene on 23 Nov 2009 02:23 "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message news:4b07fb5f$0$4891$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:52:00 +0000, assimilate wrote: > > On 20-Nov-2009, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > > > >> You guys on the right need to forget about Palin. She is a polarizing > >> personality and does not have enough supporters to win a national > >> election. It. will. never. happen. > > > > I really trust your take on the future! But for arguments sake, so > > what? It is the journey that is important. Plus driving moonbats > > bonkers is a honorable vocation! > > Actually, I called the 2008 election before Obama had the even had > Democratic nomination. Of course the old man did his part by selecting > the dingbat as a running mate. But I digress... > > The mood of the country has changed. Palin's idiot jingoism will > resonate will millions, but there will never be enough to win an > election. Agree....but she could grow into a political force, like Hillary did. > I personally think the economy will continue to be weak for the > foreseeable future. It is not obvious to me that this will cost Obama > the election in 2012, as long as he is perceived to be the most > competent person for the job. You hit it right earlier. America's mood is changing. They want to see private sector jobs, smaller government, and guts to stand up to America's enemies and rivals. America is sick of bailouts and hollow campaign promises. Obama will be tossed in 2012, just like Bush the Elder was, unless he gets in tune with America. -Greg
From: William Clark on 23 Nov 2009 07:05
In article <7muqmcF3hg3c1U1(a)mid.individual.net>, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message > news:wclark2-890C9C.11365722112009(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > > > How is a first term governor a "'lame duck"? > > > > > > > > Please explain. > > > > > > You can't figure that out yourself. Put on the thinking cap Billy. > > It appears he can't. > > > Ok, so you can't explain it either. In that case, you would be better > > keeping quiet and not looking so dumb in public. > > > > So, once again, how is a first term governor, not halfway through her > > term, a "lame duck"? > > The first two years of a governor and legislation is focussed on passing > bills. The 2nd two years are focussed on re-election, hence the term lame > duck. No, a lame duck is a politician finishing a term with no possibility of re-election. Now that might well have been true of Barbie in political terms, but not constitutional ones. > > > Oh, and being attracted to the limelight, and big money book deals are > > not answers to this one. > > She's in debt to the tune of 500k, primarily due to witch hunt legal and > ethic actions against her. Why is it irresponsible for her, as a > capitalist, to repay it and secure her family's finances. Bill Clinton > wrote a horrible book to help pay his debt from WhiteWater. Which you, I suppose, read? I thought not. I have my crayons ready for Dubya's blockbuster "memoir". The ethics charges will not turn out to be "witchhunts' - she has already been reprimanded, and in a state controlled by the GoP, and there is more to come. Or perhaps she is in debt from that "vetting" fee for the VP bid, which turns out to be another completely false claim. |