Palin's Book Being Sold "AT BELOW COST" Prices
in [Golf]
|
Prev: Palin's book on top at amazon
Next: Was Pitts right?
From: bknight on 23 Nov 2009 16:36 On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:18:32 -0800, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > ><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >news:745lg55lq6qubehsptjmeb2j1de79i72gv(a)4ax.com... >> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:13:50 -0800, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> >> wrote: >> >> > >> ><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >> >news:0ljeg5lfe9u1ph66b38clb8s8eqi21r1bq(a)4ax.com... >> >> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:48:40 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >> >> >> >My pennance will be to suffer thru another 4 years of an idiot running >> >> >the country. >> >> > >> >> >What are you willing to do? >> >> >> >> Enjoy it immensely. >> >> >> >> bk >> > >> >That means you're impressed with Obama's year so far. >> > >> >LOL! >> > >> >-Greg >> > >> LOL, only idiots tell others what they think. >> >> QED. >> >> BK > >Your thoughts aren't difficult to perceive. All one has to do is combine >liberalism, bitterness, and the maturity level of a 10 year old. > >-Greg > Your thoughts are yours, no way that I, nor anyone else should ever presume to know them. But then you're such a brain. Wrong. Only idiots presume to tell others what they think. Idiot. BK >>
From: Carbon on 23 Nov 2009 18:18 On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:23:14 -0800, dene wrote: > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > news:4b07fb5f$0$4891$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:52:00 +0000, assimilate wrote: >> > On 20-Nov-2009, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >> > >> >> You guys on the right need to forget about Palin. She is a >> >> polarizing personality and does not have enough supporters to win a >> >> national election. It. will. never. happen. >> > >> > I really trust your take on the future! But for arguments sake, so >> > what? It is the journey that is important. Plus driving moonbats >> > bonkers is a honorable vocation! >> >> Actually, I called the 2008 election before Obama had the even had >> Democratic nomination. Of course the old man did his part by selecting >> the dingbat as a running mate. But I digress... >> >> The mood of the country has changed. Palin's idiot jingoism will >> resonate will millions, but there will never be enough to win an >> election. > > Agree....but she could grow into a political force, like Hillary did. A nice comparison. Hillary has so much baggage around her that she is almost as unelectable as Palin. >> I personally think the economy will continue to be weak for the >> foreseeable future. It is not obvious to me that this will cost Obama >> the election in 2012, as long as he is perceived to be the most >> competent person for the job. > > You hit it right earlier. America's mood is changing. They want to > see private sector jobs, smaller government, and guts to stand up to > America's enemies and rivals. America is sick of bailouts and hollow > campaign promises. Obama will be tossed in 2012, just like Bush the > Elder was, unless he gets in tune with America. He will only lose if the Republicans produce a nominee seen as more capable than Obama. But they have a weakness for idiot ideologues, so I expect they'll manage to lose once again.
From: Corky's Nemesis on 23 Nov 2009 19:21 <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message news:vuvlg5pq702jidv9lrlquvca969chebqbd(a)4ax.com... > On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:18:32 -0800, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> > wrote: > > > > ><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > >news:745lg55lq6qubehsptjmeb2j1de79i72gv(a)4ax.com... > >> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:13:50 -0800, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > > >> ><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > >> >news:0ljeg5lfe9u1ph66b38clb8s8eqi21r1bq(a)4ax.com... > >> >> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:48:40 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > >> > >> >> >My pennance will be to suffer thru another 4 years of an idiot running > >> >> >the country. > >> >> > > >> >> >What are you willing to do? > >> >> > >> >> Enjoy it immensely. > >> >> > >> >> bk > >> > > >> >That means you're impressed with Obama's year so far. > >> > > >> >LOL! > >> > > >> >-Greg > >> > > >> LOL, only idiots tell others what they think. > >> > >> QED. > >> > >> BK > > > >Your thoughts aren't difficult to perceive. All one has to do is combine > >liberalism, bitterness, and the maturity level of a 10 year old. > > > >-Greg > > > > Your thoughts are yours, no way that I, nor anyone else should ever > presume to know them. > > But then you're such a brain. Wrong. > > Only idiots presume to tell others what they think. > > Idiot. Finally, something you may be good at. POST ON-TOPIC OR DON'T POST AT ALL.
From: Jack Hollis on 23 Nov 2009 19:48 On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:25:21 -0700, Howard Brazee <howard(a)brazee.net> wrote: >It seems that they are both carrying the same stick. Obama might be >trying harder to make friends with allies in the same war. Other than France, and to a lesser degree, Germany, the US relationship with its allies has never been a problem. But both Chirac and Schroder are gone and have been replaced with pro-US head's of state. The problem that Obama is responding to is anti-American sentiment in the European public. You have to distinguish between the policies of a government and public opinion.
From: Jack Hollis on 23 Nov 2009 20:00
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:27:22 -0700, Howard Brazee <howard(a)brazee.net> wrote: >We'll never know whether the bailout was a good solution as we can't >compare it with alternatives. If the purpose of the bailout was to stop rising unemployment, then it clearly didn't solve the problem. That's leaves the "it could have been worse" argument. The stimulus bill was a huge giveaway to all the special interests that got Obama elected, especially the unions. There's no doubt that it created some jobs, but they were jobs at the public expense. The idea is to create private sector jobs that generate tax revenue for the government. |