From: William Clark on
In article <akq0h5hp4ljnp135f0s4njj1rhblclfvb1(a)4ax.com>,
Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:42:38 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
>
> >The leaders of most of the counries throughout the world know that Obma
> >is a "hopeless retard".
>
> And from the way it looks, so are all the people around him.

Well they probably don't pose as "Columbia graduates", do they?
From: BAR on
In article <ajr0h5t717t8p8pc6260u8s7pj7i1ca8p1(a)4ax.com>,
bknight(a)conramp.net says...
>
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:42:38 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <4b1010dd$0$4979$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>,
> >nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says...
>
> >The leaders of most of the counries throughout the world know that Obma
> >is a "hopeless retard".
>
> As if you had a scintilla of an idea of what anyone else thought.
> You're calling someone a retard? Ironic.

Open your eyes Bobby and you will see that Obama is getting pushed
around by everyone.

From: bknight on
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:13:09 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:

>In article <ajr0h5t717t8p8pc6260u8s7pj7i1ca8p1(a)4ax.com>,
>bknight(a)conramp.net says...
>>
>> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:42:38 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <4b1010dd$0$4979$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>,
>> >nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says...
>>
>> >The leaders of most of the counries throughout the world know that Obma
>> >is a "hopeless retard".
>>
>> As if you had a scintilla of an idea of what anyone else thought.
>> You're calling someone a retard? Ironic.
>
>Open your eyes Bobby and you will see that Obama is getting pushed
>around by everyone.

Read what I wrote. You know little and project much.

BK
From: Carbon on
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 14:16:59 -0500, BAR wrote:
> In article <vfi2h5pbbmimd796fqojil0iklh7f4p5ne(a)4ax.com>,
> bknight(a)conramp.net says...
>
>> However, you really aren't very well informed, and have been proved
>> wrong in more areas than right. Everything that you post regarding
>> politics is a rehash of something someone else has said...and always
>> slanted one way. That can be said by almost everyone here though.
>
> Informed? I am well informed. I just happen to come from the other
> side of the political spectrum. You, Clark and Carbon and most of the
> other liberals have the view that if everyone doesn't agree with their
> position then there is something worng with those they oppose.

I can't speak for anyone else, but I personally don't think there is
anything wrong with being conservative. There are many things--the focus
on individual achievement, fiscal responsibility, small government--that
I genuinely admire. There are many things about it that I do not agree
with. Regardless I do not think there is anything wrong with people who
disagree with me. I will jump on people if they fail to make a rational
defense. But hey, this is Usenet. As Bert says, it's a diversion.
From: Carbon on
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 14:56:28 -0800, Dinosaur_Sr wrote:
> On Nov 28, 2:18 pm, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 14:16:59 -0500, BAR wrote:
>>
>>> Your view is jaundiced. Clark, Carbon and Baker, the worst of the
>>> liberals here don't argue the issues they argue the messengers.
>>> When they are provided with data that proves thier positions are
>>> indefensible they shoot the messenger.
>>
>> I would say you're lying, but I know you don't pay attention to who
>> says what. So instead I'll say that--once again--you stated
>> uninformed opinion as fact.
>
> All opinions are informed by something. When *all* you have to offer
> is personal attacks, you have opion on the issue, and thus you resort
> to the attacks. Fact is, the left fears Palin greatly because she can
> unite conservatives in favor of the GOP...

Fact is, opinions are not facts.