From: Dinosaur_Sr on
On Nov 19, 2:15 pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:03:15 -0600, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com>
> wrote:
>
> >More bubble bursting:
>
> >http://www.thrfeed.com/2009/11/sarah-palin-oprah-ratings-.html
>
> >Sarah Palin gives Oprah biggest audience in two years
>
> Of course.  People love car wrecks too.  :-)
>
> BK

I dunno...the current US economic policy isn't all that popular......
From: Corky's Nemesis on

<bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
news:go9bg5lect2bpbaharbf43mom34vckb5cp(a)4ax.com...
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:03:15 -0600, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> >More bubble bursting:
> >
> >http://www.thrfeed.com/2009/11/sarah-palin-oprah-ratings-.html
> >
> >Sarah Palin gives Oprah biggest audience in two years
> >
>
> Of course. People love car wrecks too. :-)
>

30 off-topic posts in one day. Trying to set a record?
POST ON-TOPIC OR DON'T POST AT ALL.


From: Frank Ketchum on

"William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message
news:wclark2-B7987F.20524318112009(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
>
> Indeed she is. Remember that Fox News is #1, too, and no one ever
> pretends that has anything to do with taste or reality, either. Being #1
> on lists like that with a book like her piece of garbage have to do with
> cheap sensationalism - nothing else.

Sort of the same reason we ended up with Obama for president.
Sensationalism - nothing else (clearly now).


From: johnty on
On 19 Nov, 12:29, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote:

>
> All of the books on Amazon's Top 100 are selling for 40% to 65% off list
> price. I can see how that would not support your argument ...



...and which argument would that be?
From: Frank Ketchum on

"johnty" <johnty1(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5b800483-210c-41af-b9d1-519a12963386(a)37g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
> On 19 Nov, 12:29, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> All of the books on Amazon's Top 100 are selling for 40% to 65% off list
>> price. I can see how that would not support your argument ...
>
>
>
> ..and which argument would that be?

The one you posted:

"Would have been more impressive if it wasn't being shifted at half
price..."