From: Dinosaur_Sr on 19 Nov 2009 15:53 On Nov 19, 2:15 pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:03:15 -0600, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> > wrote: > > >More bubble bursting: > > >http://www.thrfeed.com/2009/11/sarah-palin-oprah-ratings-.html > > >Sarah Palin gives Oprah biggest audience in two years > > Of course. People love car wrecks too. :-) > > BK I dunno...the current US economic policy isn't all that popular......
From: Corky's Nemesis on 19 Nov 2009 17:05 <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message news:go9bg5lect2bpbaharbf43mom34vckb5cp(a)4ax.com... > On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:03:15 -0600, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> > wrote: > > > >More bubble bursting: > > > >http://www.thrfeed.com/2009/11/sarah-palin-oprah-ratings-.html > > > >Sarah Palin gives Oprah biggest audience in two years > > > > Of course. People love car wrecks too. :-) > 30 off-topic posts in one day. Trying to set a record? POST ON-TOPIC OR DON'T POST AT ALL.
From: Frank Ketchum on 19 Nov 2009 18:06 "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message news:wclark2-B7987F.20524318112009(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > Indeed she is. Remember that Fox News is #1, too, and no one ever > pretends that has anything to do with taste or reality, either. Being #1 > on lists like that with a book like her piece of garbage have to do with > cheap sensationalism - nothing else. Sort of the same reason we ended up with Obama for president. Sensationalism - nothing else (clearly now).
From: johnty on 20 Nov 2009 02:32 On 19 Nov, 12:29, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > > All of the books on Amazon's Top 100 are selling for 40% to 65% off list > price. I can see how that would not support your argument ... ...and which argument would that be?
From: Frank Ketchum on 20 Nov 2009 08:43
"johnty" <johnty1(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:5b800483-210c-41af-b9d1-519a12963386(a)37g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > On 19 Nov, 12:29, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > >> >> All of the books on Amazon's Top 100 are selling for 40% to 65% off list >> price. I can see how that would not support your argument ... > > > > ..and which argument would that be? The one you posted: "Would have been more impressive if it wasn't being shifted at half price..." |