Palin's book on top at amazon
in [Golf]
|
From: Frank Ketchum on 20 Nov 2009 12:20 "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message news:clark-93CB2D.09012920112009(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > Indeed, here's an indication of how smart and accurate Fox News is: > > http://tiny.cc/FqC5z > > http://tiny.cc/jtCJ5 > > Clearly the most reliable and unbiased news source around. Right. That's the best you can do to attack Fox? Pretty laughable.
From: BAR on 20 Nov 2009 13:10 In article <e6a2cad3-576d-4298-b9a3- 5ed87b3ff11b(a)l13g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, johnty1(a)hotmail.com says... > > On 20 Nov, 13:43, "Frank Ketchum" <nos...(a)thanksanyway.com> wrote: > > "johnty" <john...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > > > > news:5b800483-210c-41af-b9d1-519a12963386(a)37g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > > > > > On 19 Nov, 12:29, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > > > > >> All of the books on Amazon's Top 100 are selling for 40% to 65% off list > > >> price. I can see how that would not support your argument ... > > > > > ..and which argument would that be? > > > > The one you posted: > > > > "Would have been more impressive if it wasn't being shifted at half > > price..." > > > > And indeed it would have been more impressive to see it on top at full > price. So what argument is not supported? Does the fact that none of the Top 100 books on Amazon are selling at full prices mean anything to you?
From: William Clark on 20 Nov 2009 14:01 In article <FaANm.17212$gd1.6000(a)newsfe05.iad>, "Frank Ketchum" <nospam(a)thanksanyway.com> wrote: > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > news:clark-93CB2D.09012920112009(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > > Indeed, here's an indication of how smart and accurate Fox News is: > > > > http://tiny.cc/FqC5z > > > > http://tiny.cc/jtCJ5 > > > > Clearly the most reliable and unbiased news source around. Right. > > That's the best you can do to attack Fox? Pretty laughable. Not when some idiot is holding it up as the only impartial and accurate news source, it isn't.
From: William Clark on 20 Nov 2009 14:05 In article <0ea27d18-f4dd-4524-acc0-bfb0afd22ef1(a)j24g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>, Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote: > On Nov 20, 9:24�am, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- > state.edu> wrote: > > > > > Did Gregory lie about the T shirt? I don't think so: > > > > Nope. The lie was that it had anything to do with tea parties. You missed the point - people who hold up signs saying "End Socailism (sic)" tend to wear t shirts like that. McVeigh did, and we know where he stood on the political spectrum. Or do they all have Che Guevara ones? But I am glad to see that you no longer challenge the accuracy of Gregory's comment about McVeigh t shirt. That is progress. > > > Actually it is hard to fathom why people would line up for 24 hours to > > have a grabage book signed by her. But then, they line up for Paris > > Hilton and Mylie Cyrus, too, so perhaps it shouldn't be a surprise. > > Or Barack Obama. Too bad no one bought your book! Oh, but they did. At full price, too.
From: Moderate on 20 Nov 2009 14:05
"William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message news:clark-123909.14010520112009(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article <FaANm.17212$gd1.6000(a)newsfe05.iad>, > "Frank Ketchum" <nospam(a)thanksanyway.com> wrote: > >> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message >> news:clark-93CB2D.09012920112009(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >> > >> > Indeed, here's an indication of how smart and accurate Fox News is: >> > >> > http://tiny.cc/FqC5z >> > >> > http://tiny.cc/jtCJ5 >> > >> > Clearly the most reliable and unbiased news source around. Right. >> >> That's the best you can do to attack Fox? Pretty laughable. > > Not when some idiot is holding it up as the only impartial and accurate > news source, it isn't. You obviously misread his original post. Here it is again ** No one ever pretends? Pretty pretentious of you to claim to speak for everyone. IMHO FOX News has a strong conservative bias, but they are more honest than any of the other major networks, IMHO. Unlike say NBC and MSNBC, they don't make up news to comment on. ** Last time I checked, "strong conservative bias," doesn't mean impartial. |